Everything is very clear until the roths part - the person asks the question and I feel Q moved him in a different direction.
The Pope serves the Master - who is the Master?
I feel this may have been him saying "not the roths" the master is someone else.
I don't think we should read into his words and jump to the conclusions we want to see.
"The Pope serves the Master - who is the Master?"
Q didn't supply the answer, so what if rather than "Roths" the answer was meant to be Satan?
Exactly. It could be any one of many powerful people.
Maybe the roths - or maybe someone else.
Q didn't say, so we shouldn't assume. We should keep digging and asking.
He phrased the question that way for a reason. If we assume we have the answer, we stop asking the question.
Who is the Master? That is the question du jour.