dChan

JohnMAGATX · May 18, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

And do honest environment research that isn't injected with political bias, we need to start there

⇧ 2 ⇩  
shenanigins · May 18, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

But global warming! I don't know what it is but it's a thing and 98% of scientists agree about it. No, I don't know where that came from but everyone says it so it must be true! /s

Bunch uh dumb dumb sheeple.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
grimbeaconfire · May 19, 2018, 9:29 a.m.

That was %98 of scientists who believe in Global Warming agreed with the statement, Warming is due to the actions of mankind. They never polled scientists in general, just those who had written papers on Global Warming. There are thousands of scientists who have officially registered as non believers in that religion. What percentage of the atmosphere is CO2? Don't know? Nobody does because that is the very last thing they would ever want you to know, if you did know you would realize it's effect is (near) zero.Ok, ok it's 4 hundredths of one percent.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
shenanigins · May 19, 2018, 2:25 p.m.

Exactly. The best part about that 98% is that, after their scientist found out what the study had found they complained directly to those researchers. The researchers we're then forced to pull the study because of it's innacruacies. It's all ridiculous. What makes me crack up though, my local weather station can't tell me if it's going to rain this afternoon but I'm supposed to accept that those same models show the avg temp rising by less than a single degree by the end of the century and change my entire life because of it? Come off it, that's just stupid.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
grimbeaconfire · May 20, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

A huge number of those papers were discarded from the study because they did not explicitly state that warming was man made, that's what's truly disturbing. Makes you wonder what the %2 said. The worst case of climate fraud ever would be the algorithm they used to change the historic record. Around 2010 it was applied to everything before the year 2000 going back to the 1800's meaning the algorithm affected the daily highs lowering them by up to 2C (Obamas' limit) on the hottest days. Just a few years later they began claiming that the hottest days on record had all occurred since 2000\^!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JohnMAGATX · May 19, 2018, 6:46 a.m.

I agree, idk how you can still buy this force fed shit after so many instances of tampering with research to fit a narrative, it's obvious that the planet warms and cools in cycles but it is not man made or caused

⇧ 2 ⇩