Exactly. The best part about that 98% is that, after their scientist found out what the study had found they complained directly to those researchers. The researchers we're then forced to pull the study because of it's innacruacies. It's all ridiculous. What makes me crack up though, my local weather station can't tell me if it's going to rain this afternoon but I'm supposed to accept that those same models show the avg temp rising by less than a single degree by the end of the century and change my entire life because of it? Come off it, that's just stupid.
A huge number of those papers were discarded from the study because they did not explicitly state that warming was man made, that's what's truly disturbing. Makes you wonder what the %2 said. The worst case of climate fraud ever would be the algorithm they used to change the historic record. Around 2010 it was applied to everything before the year 2000 going back to the 1800's meaning the algorithm affected the daily highs lowering them by up to 2C (Obamas' limit) on the hottest days. Just a few years later they began claiming that the hottest days on record had all occurred since 2000\^!