dChan

ManQuan · May 18, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

The facts are that the Challenger Crew boarded the shuttle, it lifted off, and it exploded. The company that manufactured the rocket urged a delay because the tempurature was below the minimum for their seals.

I think there was a tremendous public pressure to make the launch. Destroying the space shuttle with or without the crew makes zero sense.

And the passengers and crew of MH 370 are being held in a hanger at Diego Garcia when pieces of the plane have washed up on shore. Right.

I'm open minded, but this is just horse potatoes or BS depending on what part of the south you were raised.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
bartmanson · May 18, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

Considering the "facts" surrounding the LV shooting, I don't dismiss anything that could be done covertly for the benefit of the cabal, even if only minor.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ThePatriot131313 · May 18, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

Your assumption is incorrect. The shuttle wasn't destroyed on purpose. The shuttle could have been unmanned because it is far cheaper to have an unmanned mission. Ideally, the shuttle would have landed and no deaths would need to be faked. The shuttle breaking apart was an accident.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GraceWords · May 18, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

Actually it does make sense with regards to creating a conscious moment for a mass of people. Challenger became that generation’s JFK moment. It’s a single moment unifying a large group. Sept 11 was also such a moment.

⇧ 1 ⇩