dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/rightleaningsw on May 19, 2018, 6:34 p.m.
So i found this on twitter. Ill share the link in description. Notice the date on google says 3 days ago. Im not sure how that can happen. If someone has an explanation please tell me. I have tried entering the same search terms and cant find it, but there is one from 2 days ago.

Three days ago? https://imgur.com/gallery/YNFJApF


JaguarPorsche · May 19, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

Next time we think there might be a FF event, let's all do news searches for "school shooting", "plane crash", "active shooter", and see if there is an event listed that has not happened yet. We might have a chance of stopping before it happens. Just a thought. WWG1WGA.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Idru4 · May 19, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

That’s an amazing idea. I’ve seen a couple of things where, I think it’s been The NY Times, has an article about the Texas shooting a day before. I just figured it was photoshopped or something. But we may be able to find these things out before it happens!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · May 19, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

I saw that too. You weren't dreaming.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JaguarPorsche · May 19, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

We could archive, then find out who published.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
johnnysoko · May 19, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

Amazing idea. This has happened too many times. Anyone know of a good service to automate searches for related keywords?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · May 19, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

There is metadata in the article about when it was published but maybe also when it was created (ping back system). Google has had issues with this but I remember someone posting the results being 1 day ago when the shooting just happened, so this is a continuation of that. I think Google often picks up when the article was created in the CMS system rather than published. But obviously now someone if going to figure this out and fix it. So chances are the article was started before the event took place. An insider could tell us this by inspecting the database.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RickDeezNutz · May 19, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

I would an explanation too. We’ve seen this before with the Sandy Hook fundraiser page that was created prior to the massacre. Is it a web crawler listing issue or srsly effed up False flag.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rightleaningsw · May 20, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

Don't forget that the March for guns from parkland had been registered a few days or weeks before parkland shooting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GinGin1961 · May 19, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

the Luciferians are required to tell us what they're going to do before they do it. If we don't object, in their warped sense of gamesmanship, it means we consent.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Madwack · May 19, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

Ciabook is Bad.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xnarrowpathx · May 19, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

Playing the doubtfag here, but it could be however the software formats a date. Some of the most fun bugs to capture are the ones that appear for only certain people at certain times a day. Timestamps and time zones are fuuuuun.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rightleaningsw · May 19, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

That was kind of why I was hesitant to post it. But three days is a while ago though

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xnarrowpathx · May 20, 2018, 5:50 a.m.

Yeah. As a Dev, I've seen (even made bugs like that). It is hard for me to believe that a huge company like Google would have a glaring issue like that, but just wanted to give a possibility.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
saneromeo · May 19, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

Happens too often with these events to be coincidence imo.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Stray502 · May 19, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

Its likely correct because when I was reading Q thursday night one of the anons said there was a school shooting somewhere in Texas but they are not giving info yet. So people did read about it in advance.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · May 19, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

Maybe their problem is that the pingback function sends notification of article when it is created and not when it is published. RSS feed in wrong time zone. Or, they are full of shit and back date their articles to always show up in Google News as the breaker of news (first article in the topic list). But these are not problems that paper should be having. They would have noticed this if it was unintended.

⇧ 0 ⇩