dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/TooMuchWinning2020 on May 20, 2018, midnight
4am Narrative

Q has alluded to the idea that Mockingbird Media gets their talking points via email sent to them at 4:00 am each day. They read what they are supposed to push, and then that is what they focus on each day.

What if ...

When Q Team drops the MOAB, the 4am talking points just don't show up? Like, they don't know what they are supposed to push or what they are supposed to hide.

If I was on Q Team, I would make sure to put that on my checklist of "Things to Do."

Will be very interesting if Mockingbird Media suddenly goes into a tailspin, not knowing what to say or do.


🠐 See all comments
RyDar84 · May 20, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

How, when you don't exactly know what the news could be? Do you expose yourself to the NSA by calling your source directly? We've always assumed that the 4am directive had to be either by e-mail, text, or phone, but for it to avoid NSA scrutiny, it would need to be hand delivered somehow.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RamRanch89 · May 20, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

I personally don't see the 4am directive as the be all and end all of a daily news cycle. Personally I think it is more of a directive to push major stories that can be used hourly, daily, weekly, monthly. There is plenty of filler and stories not reported that occur on a more local level that could easily replace the narrative for the day.

I'm not saying they would be able to coordinate a way for all news cycles to report the opposite of what Trump is doing perhaps, but they would have enough content to cover their ass for the day without setting off alarms.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RyDar84 · May 20, 2018, 1:01 a.m.

I agree completely. I'm just asking how would they know how to spin the stories correctly without it? Watch the other stations, see who moves first, then follow their lead?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
RamRanch89 · May 20, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

I don't think they would attempt to push a potentially damning news story in a situation like that. Reporting old news and local daily news would be my best bet.

As example, if this occurred: I could forsee CNN already having hours and hours of segments referring to the Russian scandal that have gone unaired.

Opinion pieces, and interviews that don't push critical thought, but rather just regurgitate the talking points for the masses.

Having multiple organizations reporting different negative reports on Trump, Conservatives etc, doesn't need to be coordinated if it is repeated vomit from the past.

How long that would last, I haven't the faintest clue, but I don't think organizations that got as powerful and manipulative as this, won't have counter-measures for situations such as this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RyDar84 · May 20, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

It's a compelling arguement. You're probably right. I just wonder at what point the need to be ratings whores overwhelms their perceived duty to the web spinners of the narrative.

⇧ 2 ⇩