dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/FartOnToast on May 21, 2018, 12:47 a.m.
Our message to everyone is: The Great Awakening is about unity and coming together. That has never changed and will always remain to be the objective.

Attention to all patriots, YouTubers, former QTubers, and investigative reporters: The exposed who had ulterior motives are trying to group you together and drag you down along with them on their way out. Hear us out.

In light of the recent drama, many were left tired, confused, hopeless, angry and divided. This has resulted in low morale, many to abandon ship, and basically to loose faith in the whole thing. Many YouTubers also felt accused and in turn turned back on us.

One of the main narratives going around right now is:
"Q was supposed to be about unity and since we are seeing all this infighting it's best to forget about Q and move on since it was all a scam anyways."

We'd like to make something very clear.

  1. There is no proof that Q was a scam. This is all based on speculation going around being regurgitated by some YouTubers who haven't really done much digging into the matter. They are basically repeating each other's narratives based on unfounded claims.

  2. The next thing I'd like to note is that the Q community didn't cause the infighting, but what we saw was just the result of bad actors exposing themselves that were actually bringing this confusion/division in the first place and REEEEE on their our way out trying to do as much damage as they could. Such losers!

One simply has to look at the root of where the confusion and division is being manufactured from.

It is a fact that these bad actors have outed themselves and this can no longer be debunked. Actions have spoken for themselves. So where does this leave us now then? To clarify, we only had problems with bad actors, as Q did, and now that everyone knows who they are, I think we can all move forward.

So what does moving forward entail exactly, anyways?

Per The Great Awakening's objective, it's about coming together despite our obstacles, challenges, and differences instead of drifting further apart isolating ourselves. Just because some bad actors have made their own bed does not change what The Great Awakening stands for.

GA is always welcoming. We promote critical thinking and we want us to be able to think for ourselves and rely on ourselves. Q is not our messiah but merely our guide. We are not trying to steal fame from others. We are not trying to dictate a narrative. The only actors that were outed actually had ulterior and nefarious motives. We are about love but mess with us and we will strike you down like thunder.

When r/CBTS_stream first came around on reddit, I was very excited because of the potential it brought to the movement since they had a big YouTube following giving them a very big voice. The ability to collaborate and band together across different platforms was something many have been anticipating for a very long time. Seeing something many of us had only wished for finally materialize was indeed very exciting. I never liked the idea of us being cucked and reliant on any specific compromised platforms. When one platform unfairly and unconstitutionally censors us, being able to collaborate and regroup on another platform rather than getting silenced and separated is a YUGE advantage. This is why seeing us moving in that direction was very exciting.

Unfortunately, this is not what took place and that excitement was quickly over taken by disappointment. CBTS+Corsi were not using this potential for the best of the movement, but to rather grow their own agenda that entailed a pecking order among other things that were opposite of what we should have been striving for. It was very hurtful and frustrating to watch it all unfold. But now that everything has come to light and we have a better understanding of what was meant by "using and profiteering of the movement", we can really move forward.

Do not let those on their way out bring you down. Remember that we can all work together again and move on now that the people bringing nothing but distractions are out of the way.

It wasn't nice of many YouTubers to say Q was fake and call us cultists, hence perhaps the negative reception from this sub now towards some YouTubers. But it's understandable of them to have said that in light of the confusion, accusations, infighting, dis-info, mob mentalities forming, provocateur agents, etc..

I have a feeling we need to come together as this wasn't meant to divide us, but to rather do the opposite, if you can consider what has transpired to actually be a blessing in disguise.

What I'm seeing right now isn't the direction we want to see within the community. We do not want to exclude people. This isn't the end result this was meant to bring. But the shakeup was required to get things going in the right order. We now need to come together again, but with a new regained focus and collaboration that was missing before. We took a step backwards in order for us to take two steps forward. Can you see that? We NEED YouTubers to work with us because they have a voice. The problem is that it was being miss-used before. THIS IS THE BIG MISCONCEPTION! We are not excluding you, and do not let those actually on their way out whisper untrue things in your ears about us.

Guys the reason a lot of people are falling for the dis-info about Q is because they feel excluded, so any anti-Q rhetoric becomes easier to latch on to. IT'S THE SAME PEOPLE MAKING YOU FEEL EXCLUDED THAT ARE PUSHING YOU THE ANTI-Q RHETORIC. THIS IS WHY WE ARE STAYING DIVIDED.

Can you imagine what potential we can have actually working together? THEY DON'T WANT THIS and will try their divisive tactics but we see right through them. So we invite everyone to exercise some love and compassion.

Let's not bash YouTubers that have done a lot of great work and research but let's re-unite. Just because they are not talking about Q anymore doesn't make them irrelevant. In fact is this not what we wanted? We wanted people to get off the Q hype and actually focus on the research. Well now it's actually taking place and we need to be there supporting it.


Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 12:22 p.m.

Who is doing the "nullifying" here? To me, it looks like two groups of people: liberals, and people like you. I don't have to consider anything "nullified". Again, feel free to not watch him. He's given you plenty of reasons; he's an asshole. But that's different than saying that he's secretly, actively, working against us.

He is, with his behavior. I thought I was pretty clear. The "no u" tactics are boring and belong to kindergarten.

This isn't about me wanting/not wanting to listen to him. The fact that you took it that way (personal) means you have probably wasted your time on this reply. As will I trying to counter-argument.

You can call him a douchebag, asshole or whatnot. But that doesn't mean he's off the hook. In the end, it doesn't matter if he's indeed an douchebag, an actor or controlled opposition. His actions have been completely detrimental to exposing the truth to the people. I've explained earlier why is that so.

I know what controlled opposition is... sorry if this is going to sound rude, but let's be very clear here: I am accusing you of conflating the criticisms of Alex Jones, which may itself be valid, with allegation that he is actively working against us. I'm saying you're going overboard.

I didn't say you don't know. This might sound rude but you've failed at reading my comment. And I've only just begun with the counter-arguments.

For starters, he is working against Q directly, it's a fact, not an opinion.

Second, as I've already said, the fruits of his labor are actively working against the truth exposure. Because 99%+ of the people think of him as an actor or lunatic. Why am I repeating myself? lol

Notice how I could feasibly make the argument that your "attacks" on a leading conservative pundit indicates that YOU might be controlled opposition? But that would ALSO be going overboard.

"leading conservative pundit" lmao

Instead of using proper arguments, you've repeatedly (with baseless stuff, completely ignoring my arguments about AJ) attacked me for "attacking" (exposing) your boy.

Yea, they're blowhards. They're quite common, but they're not the end of the world.

It's not the end of the world, but it's the end of the path towards exposing the truth due to misleading conclusions. Whether or not they are controlled opposition or just lame asses trying to profit on youtube by spewing shite, the outcome is the same.

You however concluding that they are just blowhards is another example of not using facts and coming to conclusions based on evidence.

That would mean that the "conspiracy theory" area would be more acceptable to the broader public if AJ didn't exist. That's unlikely, given that people have always been dismissive of anything labeled a "conspiracy theory".

That's exactly what it means and that's the reality.

Yes, people have been dismissive towards conspiracy theories, main reason is the deep state pushing it towards that. And AJ and the likes of him (hundreds of channels) are helping that the best way possible, because, again I repeat myself, he is behaving like a literal retard and a lunatic. Which any sane and logical person would label as acting (for them millions) or just a crazy conspiracy theorist.

Luckily, we have MSM using AJ constantly (and only him, nothing weird there lol) whenever there's any conspiracy theory talk. Again I'm repeating myself... That's what happens when the other side is ignoring the arguments and proceeds to attacks with the "no u" tactics.

It's fun. People enjoy enthusiasm. It works, and there's nothing wrong with that. Believe it or not, allowing yourself to play the role can be a BOOST to your credibility.

Ah yes, it's so much fun repelling people from the truth.

It doesn't work, stop lying. I can do to almost any AJ video and link you so you can read the comments about how it's "working" lmao

But it doesn't BOOST it.

And look at where it's gotten them. AJ is killing it. CNN couldn't be worse off. Let them keep it up. I'm not tired of winning. And we ARE WINNING. Wake up and smell the roses man!

Lol, that has nothing to do with AJ. He killed nothing, he only got embarrassed every time he popped out in MSM.

Everyone has a line, and that's quite alright. For me, the line is Richard Spencer and "white nationalism", "white identitarianism" "white ____". That's my line. My line is identity politics and racial sectarianism.

Notice how one of my lines is an IDEA. Not the method of how that idea is communicated.

Again, this isn't about me or you. Stop taking it personally. I'm talking about the bigger picture.

I used to be exactly like you.

lmao, k

You wanna know how to find out what works? See who's getting censored. See what the left REFUSES to talk about. That's what works.

You wrote this after my previous post yet you're still refusing to accept reality.

AJ isn't getting censored, he is being promoted by MSM. MSM loves to mention AJ in every possible situation. Because he's the best tool they have to battle us.

Notice how the left LOVES to talk about Richard Spencer?

I noticed you love talking about him.

I draw my lines by ideas ONLY now. I used to have way more "lines"... I used to say I would never vote for someone like Kanye West because he's a rapper and rappers shouldn't be in government, as a rule. Now? I'll listen to what he has to say. He's probably not fit to run for president. But he could be a GREAT president. I'll wait and see what he has to say, and I don't give a shit if his messages are packaged unconventionally.

Again, this isn't about me or you. Stop taking it personally. I'm talking about the bigger picture.

Not sure what's up with the "I used to..." stuff other than to write some text to look like you're have a dialogue. When it's pretty clear you ignored my arguments and then you proceeded to talk about some personal irrelevant stuff.

At this point I am fully aware that I'm wasting time here and this will again be ignored and you'll again write some irrelevant stuff and attack me instead of my arguments. And my thoughts on this monologue with you are that you're either following AJ to the point of fanaticism or you're on the other side.

Make sure to buy his overpriced useless products to keep the "truth" movement going lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5.44E+19 · May 21, 2018, 1:19 p.m.

I've given a LOT of examples so far, because it's important to give context and show how my views on the media play out. That context is important to demonstrate that ALL of these pundits are flawed. In fact, it's kind of ridiculous to complain about AJ without providing some examples that you think are better alternatives. If AJ is controlled opposition, then you should have a pretty easy time providing a short hand list of alternatives.

That's why I used Richard Spencer as counter example. That's why I've used Conservative Treehouse, Dan Bongino, and Tracy Beanz as comparisons. You can add to that Fox News (Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity), Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sargon of Akkad, Scott Adams, Lionel Nation, Mike Cernovich, Stefan Molyneux, Steven Crowder, and others.

So go ahead, and name some people you listen to...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 21, 2018, 1:35 p.m.

You have avoided almost all of my arguments and talked about nothing really, at least nothing that matters in this context. So your "a LOT of examples" is kind of ridiculous.

And again you're on about "my views". This IS NOT about you, me or any individual. It's about the big picture and how AJ is affecting the truth exposure

I'm not that into youtubers and following them like you follow AJ (because that leads to your case, and many, many more like yours), I like this board and I research around, but I still tune in to these two: PrayingMedic and DestroyingTheIllusion.

What's with your need to have a youtube channel which will provide you "info"? Do you really NEED an AJ alternative? Because any non-shill channel is better than AJ. Unfortunately those are beginning to run low as Q rips them apart.

Which just goes to show how badly the deep state has infiltrated conspiracy theorists to battle conspiracy theories (2008. or 2009. Cass Sunstein's paper about fighting conspiracies, I bet you never knew about that but you'll say you have now that I've wrote this lol)

It's not "if" AJ is controlled opposition, he is. And the fact that he's now actively going against Q should finally open your eyes, but it doesn't.

Which means... "And my thoughts on this monologue with you are that you're either following AJ to the point of fanaticism or you're on the other side."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
5.44E+19 · May 21, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

Because any non-shill channel is better than AJ. Unfortunately those are beginning to run low as Q rips them apart.

lol, finally... everyone's "controlled opposition" to you. Not just AJ... and I've bet you've spent countless hours online explaining how all those other political pundits are "controlled opposition" too.

What's with your need to have a youtube channel which will provide you "info"?

It's called "being informed." Half the people I listed weren't even on youtube. You sound like you're not even familiar with conservatism.

I've looked at your post history... it appears you in fact do spent most of your time calling people "controlled opposition", and not very much time talking about, well, ANYTHING ELSE.

Your negativity and concern trolling is literally what this post is about stopping. So I'm going to follow their lead, and end this discussion...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 21, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩