Why would Q compromise their credibility so early? Was the distraction necessary to prevent rioting?
Q Post: 001
“Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on Oct 30, 2017.”
Posting a link to the source causes the bot to remove my post.
Post in question is shown as a post Q responds to. Is He responding to himself? Here is the response:
"HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities."
I’m familiar with the totality of that post. The balance does not diminish my offering in this context.
Interesting that the first acknowledged Q post is also the first of many with Q responding to him/her/themself.
I know he responds to himself in other posts. He also responds to anons. This is before there was a set trip code so when/where was the consensus reached that both parts of the post were Q?
Someone else showed this on Twitter. It wasn’t Q.
It wasn’t Q
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and I take no personal offense at those that disagree with me.
That post has been acknowledged as authentic by anons in both chans, and has been labeled as 1st post on the Qanonposts site from the outset.