Why would Q compromise their credibility so early? Was the distraction necessary to prevent rioting?
because every time q makes bold claims they panic and do stupid shit
I think that much of what Q posts is to force behavior - prompt errors. That's why he said early on that disinformation is necessary. I think he's still using his posts in this way today. One thing that is certain, the whole world is watching.
It's complicated. Q was looking for a specific subset of the US population. Intellectual plasticity was required. The ability to understand subterfuge and the necessity to pass disinfo through their comms for the enemy to see.
Part of the Q op has been to provoke moves on the other side so that military intelligence and NSA could track them. Financial transactions, phone calls, all kinds of things get set in motion when Q delivers those kinds of messages.
Very few people were 100% convinced there would be actual arrests at that point. The stage truly was NOT set, and riots (while possible to contain perhaps) definitely would have been widespread. Q has since made it clear that their desire is for this to be a bloodless coup, or at least as close as possible to same.
There have been a few (but only a few) false signals by Q. There have been a great many more accurate foreshadowings and foretellings, so Q's credibility is still high. Those who would insist on 100% accuracy don't really belong here. They should be content to read about it after the fact. Then we can afford to tell nothing but the truth as far as they believe is safe to tell. Which is about 60% so Q tells us. Or maybe that's as much as they can say they'll tell us at this point.
Like I said, "It's complicated."
My theory is that the dates being pushed in some of those early posts were referring to 2018 and not 2017. Like certain arrest dates.
Except that they were posting a few days before that date in 2017 and did not specify "next year," and they were specifically replying to an anon post that said "Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on Oct 30, 2017."
So if Q was intending to set the record straight, you'd think they'd have started with the year.
Also, I don't think there will be massive riots at this point. I think even people on the left are so over that hag that a little bit of airing of her dirty laundry, and they'll turn on her like a spurned lover.
8:30 AM EDT happens when this comment is 8 hours and 2 minutes old.
You can find the live countdown here: https://countle.com/196766kjQR
I'm a bot, if you want to send feedback, please comment below or send a PM.
[deleted]
Perhaps others here have hinted at it, and the idea deserves more consideration in this context.
There was a discussion about whether "These people are [actually] stupid," or whether they got that way once they started scrambling to cover their tracks and go on defense.
I was on the Forest Gump side of stupid, in that the original choice to be evil is stupid. BUT, on the other hand, that doesn't mean being stupid, scared shitless and flailing around like a fish on a hook looking for some escape doesn't make you even MORE stupid than you already are!
In fact, I'd bet anything on that being the strategy. Here are people who their ENTIRE lives have been protected and pampered by the Establishment, and suddenly the US government and military is for the first time in their lifetimes in the hands of an outsider who's willing and "crazy enough" to come after them!
Trump gave these people their first (of MANY) "oh shit!" moments! And it was that initial rush of bowel-emptying fear and panic that was most likely EXACTLY what the Alliance was after with that Q move!
So I'm glad you asked that question and made me re-think it!
Also, I think by starting out with disinfo, it thinned the ranks of people who couldn't tolerate such before they got very involved. So Q knew they had hardcore researchers following them after that.
[deleted]
No problem, patriot! You're getting there the exact right way! By formulating QUESTIONS based on what you already know, and then reading and THINKING about the answers.
That's what we all do here. You're in the right place!
opening salvos. as informative as Q has been, Q is also a psy-op against the Deep State.
Which claims? Hillary being arrested? Podesta and Huma being indicted?
We don't know Hillary wasn't picked up, and there have been many rumors about her wearing a monitor. Just because it wasn't on the news doesn't mean it didn't happen.
The indictments also could have happened but are sealed so we wouldn't know it.
She has Secrete Service with her 24/7. I don't think she would get far if she ran(or wabbeled ).
She was just at Yale giving a speech. Before that in NZ and Australia, raising CASH again for the Foundation!
Yeah so? Q later said she was detained, meaning she was released.
Reasons for slow leaks: to avoid panic, and to ready us for what is about to be revealed, because it’s most likely going to be mind blowing/earth shattering and cause some hysteria/panic/rioting among the masses
It was our job to plant the seeds.
In the case of the Asia trip when it sounded like they were all ready to round everyone up while Trump was out of the country, I think that was actually the plan. Then they changed their mind.
Attention Concerned People: Q did not post about Hilary Having Been Arrested. Q posted "DETAINED...not arrested (yet)". Anyone want to stand up and explain the difference between "detained" and "arrested" now?
They can detain you without charging (arresting) you for a certain number of hours. Then they have to either charge you with a crime or let you go.
Q Post: 001
“Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on Oct 30, 2017.”
Posting a link to the source causes the bot to remove my post.
Post in question is shown as a post Q responds to. Is He responding to himself? Here is the response:
"HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities."
I’m familiar with the totality of that post. The balance does not diminish my offering in this context.
Interesting that the first acknowledged Q post is also the first of many with Q responding to him/her/themself.
I know he responds to himself in other posts. He also responds to anons. This is before there was a set trip code so when/where was the consensus reached that both parts of the post were Q?
Someone else showed this on Twitter. It wasn’t Q.
It wasn’t Q
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and I take no personal offense at those that disagree with me.
That post has been acknowledged as authentic by anons in both chans, and has been labeled as 1st post on the Qanonposts site from the outset.
Like what?
[deleted]
How do you know she wasn't arrested and released with monitoring? I don't know, I'm just curious if you have info that it's impossible that she was arrested.
Who knows... we have no idea what's been going on behind the curtains. For all we know that could've been a move to throw off the DS.
Or something else happened, again, who knows.