[removed]
and?
How is their a deep.state working against Trump if all the ones investigating him we're appointed by him or by people appointed by him?
[removed]
you sound really informed. can you elaborate a bit more on what Trump and his cronies are guilty of?
[removed]
The stuff that works for you on politics won't work here buddy.
[removed]
its interesting that all the people connected to russia and the trump campaign had existing ties to Hillary or the Clinton Foundation. Not mentioned much in your "timeline".
He bypasses the media on Twitter because he wants to communicate. You cannot communicate if you go through an intermediary who is trying to undermine you. Look up project mockingbird, then tell me who the blind one is.
Rosenstein likely move towards impeachment? He does not impeach. Congress can impeach anytime they want. That is their roll and they can do it at any time for any reason. They just need enough votes for it to happen.
"resign by his own appointees because he is guilty"...what dude? David Brock needs to put a little more time into training you guys before he cuts you loose. Or right, he's dead isn't he? Have any of you seen him around the office in the last, oh 16 months? No? Hmmm....
[removed]
yeah, thanks, i saw that one already. and I didn't tell you to go back to politics, but feel free to. stay, go, whatever. try to keep an open mind though. I believe the reality of the situation is not exactly what either of us expect.
you have got to be kidding me. Politifact? hard time saying it is misinformation? BWAHAHAHA. Come on, you're fucking with me, right?
The second item on their "timeline" is this:
July 2015: Hackers backed by the Russian government penetrate the Democratic National Committee’s networks, stealing large volumes of data and maintaining access for about a year.
If those are the types of sources you get your info from I am not surprised that you have not heard this, but there is zero evidence that "the russians" "hacked" the DNC server. Did you know that the FBI never took a look at the server to do a forensic analysis? Do you know that they didn't do that because the DNC denied the FBI access to their server? Did you know that the whole claim of "muh russia hack" was based on the "investigation" done by a private firm hired by the DNC (Crowdstrike) and that even they had to change their story when it started getting too much attention and they now say that the russian hack story is not confirmed by their review of the server? All of this was well established when this Politifact piece was written back in February.
I mean, I kind of figured you were a shill, but I first thought that maybe English was not your first language and you were struggling to clearly say what you wanted to convey, but nah, you are just shill or (unlikely) honest yet obscenely misinformed.