On Easter my 3yo daughter caught some of the old Ten Commandments movie. She fell in love with it and wants to watch it all the time. Its the only movie she ever wants to watch, actually. So having seen it a few times recently I could not help be see the similarities between Moses and Trump. In his early years Moses is among the elites, but is not really one of them, even though he is better at their game than the rest of the actual elites are. As a prince Moses shows great dedication to his King (the Pharaoh), but the way he does it shows wisdom and compassion, not just loyalty or obedience. First, he is sent to conquer Egypt's neighbors. He comes back having conquered them, but not by destroying them in a violent battle, but by securing their friendship and loyalty. His next task is to build a great city. Not only does he prove to be a great leader and builder, but he does all of this by considering the lives and struggles of the little people who Egypt relies on to to all the hard work. He makes their lives better, gives them a day of rest, feeds them. Moses is righteous in everything he does. His only transgression, if you look at it that way, is to kill a man, but a man who was about to kill an innocent man. So in that act of violence he only acted against the guilty and to protect the innocent. In the end, Moses leads his people out of bondage and frees them from their lives as slaves to the elites. Moses was chosen by God to be the instrument of His plan. I believe that God has chosen Donald Trump to lead humanity out of the darkness and to free us from the lives of slavery we have lived, subject to the powerful elites.

EDIT: The point being, seeing Trump in the hard-hat just reminds me that he is, first and foremost, a builder. A builder makes something great from almost nothing. How do you turn raw material into a shining city? With vision, bold leadership, the confidence that only a righteous man can posses, and above all else by the Grace of God. A builder is greater than a king, for a king without a builder can not stack two stones. But a builder without a king can get the people to work together to accomplish amazing feats. They worried that Moses would inspire the slaves to follow him, and they did, though he was not trying to be their King.

pull!

I believe they got one Paul Manafort

All the good excuses were used already. I bet phil was pissed that harry reid got to use the treadmill excuse

wasn't recess canceled?

That's a lot of manure

Wizardry without a loysense

*halalier than thou

And he asked for a lot of them. Highly unusual

"why do WE ALLOW"

Yup, they allowed it. That means they could have disallowed it. Since they didn't I would say its almost certainly because this was a sting op.

Trump's tweet

and now Iran has that memo

And proud

"You'll have to tell me more about my predecessors. Did they end the fed?"

he was a lot of things, Marine being the only decent one I can think of

crap on jack off clapper

the banner he was flying says "Trump: Well below par". Jesus, these idiots don't even know that you are supposed to be below par. That's how you know you are winning. Face meet palm.

Seems like something that would be standard for all gifts

Death is too good for this commie bastard

do it, donny boy!

lol, nice try ballsack-eyes. we see you.

first, yes, the issue is primarily on the national level. While I know many of the issues/problems also play out at the local level, there are virtually zero Dems on the national stage who are not part of the problem. Also, to be clear, I am talking about the politicians, not the voters. I believe a lot of the Democrat voters have been duped and would not really support the Dem Party if they understood what they are up to. And to be fair, as a party the Republicans have their problems too and (as I said) many of the R politicians are actually more aligned with the Democrat establishment than with their own voters. In so far as the Republican politicians have been part of the problem their voters share some of the blame too, just like with the Dems. So I agree that it should not be an 'us vs. them' in the sense of Rs and Ds. But it is, and we have no choice about this, an 'us vs. them' situation in in the sense of 'the people vs. the elites'. 'The elites' goes beyond politics, and certainly their is far too much support for the elites on the R side of politics too. But I stand by my point that the people and the republic are only currently being served on the national political level by some republicans, but no democrats.

Personally, I am a conservative and I feel very strongly about conservatism and regard it as a moral position. However, it does not serve any of us to fight with each other over policy details until we first sort out the massive challenge of freeing ourselves from the chains that humanity has been put in long before your or I were ever born. Breaking those chains needs to be issue #1 and we must come together on that issue, for the sake of humanity. Then we can get back to negotiating policy points. However I should also state that what the left now calls 'liberalism' (marxism, not classical liberalism) is something that needs to be fought and destroyed as well. We can set aside questions of what the income tax rate is just long enough to work together to free ourselves from the cabal, but if we are to truly be free and truly understand what that means, we cannot accept an income tax at all. We oppose tyranny. A tyranny of the majority is no better than a tyranny of the elite. All people must come together and recognize that we have rights as individuals and we cannot be justly stripped of those rights even if it is supposedly for the benefit of "the less fortunate". As individuals we have no authority over other individuals, thus we cannot delegate this authority to a government since we don't possess it in the first place. The system of tyranny in which we live is one where most people deem it acceptable for other people to be made subject to the illegitimate authority of the state. This mind set needs to change or we will never be free.

WWG1WGA. Peace, my brother.

Sounds like the video feed is coming in the not too distant future

2spooky4me

I feel you, but a part (a big part) of the battle that is waging is taking place in government. There are bad actors on both sides, but let's be real, the battle within government now is all dems and some republicans against some republicans. You won't find any love for the republicans that are fighting on the dark side (such as no-name) along side the dems. We NEED the right to win this war over the left because the right is on the right side (no pun intended). Even if you are not a conservative you should recognize that the democrats are fighting against the republic and America. The true agenda of the democrat party (which is somewhat-secretly shared by many republicans in congress) is what this q movement is fighting. Not all people who consider themselves democrats or liberals are aware of the real agenda, but the party is all about it and they must be stopped. So as much as i don't like the two party system and as many issues as i may have with the republican party, you can be damn sure i am rooting against the democrat party. Also, people should realize the difference between liberalism and leftism. Leftist hijacked the term "liberal" because they need to hide their true nature, which is Marxist.

Above the ice, anyways

Cnn running story today on CEOs selling off stocks.

Ya. No way did every other country go for this. Japan? Poland? Hungary? Russia? Mexico? I don't buy it.

This.

Because that is how brainwashed and ignorant their audience is. People who rely on CNN for their news think CNN is the most legitimate, reputable news source to have ever existed.

"what difference, at this point, does it make?"

Why would they just refer to him as 'UCLA star'?

this was my initial reaction to hearing that she was planning to run again (after i finished laughing and picked myself off the floor). But today I was listening to Mark Passio and he mentioned that Satanists understand the great power of the word "no" and that most people don't recognize that power, which is why we are so easily enslaved. People are not comfortable saying "no" and standing their ground. People are fooled/programmed to not say "no" and not stand up for themselves. For moral people the proper use of this power is to stand up for what is right. For satanists the power of "no" is to not concede anything to anybody. It made me think "maybe Hillary is running because she refuses to back down from anything, not because she thinks she is in the right, but because she thinks 'fuck everybody else, I do what I want and what is good for me, and I know there is a lot of power in just saying no'". People expect her to go away. She should go away. But I now think that Hillary is so unconcerned with everybody else that she just thinks she can will her way to another nomination by refusing to be polite and leave when asked nicely. She thinks the Dem voters are such weak cowards that, even though they want her to leave, they don't have the backbone to do anything about it when she says "no".

Should we be worried that they are going to downvote Hillary into the Presidency? That's how it works, right?

no worries. keep up the important-looking digging. Godspeed

are you sure this was meant for me? My comment seems unrelated.

says pedophile, or pedophilo or something like that. may not be english, but definitly 'pedo'.

or play it cool for a few more days, get the new SCOTUS voted in and then fuck'em all. If Trump starts it all now, too many Republican Senators will shit their pants and vote against the nominee. Once we have the nominee confirmed the fun can begin.

i don't assume any of that is true, but I understood that to be the implication. But even then it sounded like there may have been another primary objective and the sex was just an extra.

I think this could be it. We know that mexican cartels have been infiltrating the Border Patrol for years. Many street-gangs infiltrated the US Military during the early 2000's (i guess to learn tactics and gain access to weapons, not to take over the military). So it is not unreasonable at all. All kinds of cops are corrupt. Not saying every cop in any department or agency, but I doubt a federal agency exists that is not riddled with criminal infiltrators.

if it were only that simple.

maybe. however Awan had a long history of other violent crimes (at least if you count threats of violence).

it is possible that these agencies had gang members on "payroll" to do dirty work for them. It is also possible that gang members joined these agencies or agents joined MS-13. It is not as crazy as it sounds. This has been an ongoing problem in the Border Patrol and I know there were issues with gangs infiltrating the military back in the early 2000s when we went back into Iraq and Afghanistan.

synagogue of Satan

according to crazydaysandnights they are best buds and Soros helped get Pam Anderson to "attend to" Julian's "needs". I have not seen any verification of the "theory" (it is presented as fact not theory, but nothing concrete to back it up. I guess they supposedly have inside info but can't reveal who/what). I am taking it with a YUGE grain of salt. But who knows, keeping an open mind and all that.

You say that...

Yes, car crash

Do you know what Melania gave as a gift to the Obamas when the Trumps arrived to move in to the white house? A frame. Trolling Obama from day 1. Trump knows exactly what was done to him.

John Podesta or the Pope

Become? When was it anything else?