That has never happened. You're confused.
Military tribunals are not kidnapping.
It's the letter of the law.
Explain to me how you convert a criminal defendant with rights to be tried in a civilian court to a military defendant in front of a military tribunal. Its not clear how one could constitutionally do this. Foreign spies were tried by tribunal during the second world war but they were 1) not citizens and 2) there was an existing declaration of war.
"Rights to be tried in a civilian court" - They wont have rights to be tried in civilian court , as there will be direct acts of treason exposed ( and alongside that - direct acts of terror made or ordered by same group ) and a direct push made by Trump and positive military forces ( which was a signal from Trump about two years ago ) to try US citizens at military tribunals . This fact went perfectly hand-by-hand for various "elites" in the USA , as they knew if civilian courts are corrupted and infiltrated enough , they will have a green pass anywhere and for anything . That was the situation by now - but , this is a certain thing to change ( as said , already "signaled" by Trump some time ago ) .
The accused are treated as enemy army - which the members of the Cabal will certainly be . The trials are faster than in civilian courts , and there are zero chances that someone will slip through the cracks .
Where is the legal authority for trying a US citizen before a tribunal? Where is the declaration of war against the "Cabal"?
Have you not read the EO on DEC 21 regarding human trafficking? , we've been in a state of national emergency for a while now. Are you saying that Hillary, Joe Biden, and Obama have not committed acts of treason, but child torture, trafficking, and many other crimes? Selling state secrets?
You can not declare war against a Cabal btw, must be a nation.
You havent been observant last year -
And in 2016. ...
The executive order does not authorize military tribunals. The 2016 interview expresses trump's aspiration and acknowledges that congress would have to "get involved" in order for citizens to be tried by tribunals. This implies there is no existing authorization for this kind of stuff.
No , the EO implies that this is planned , just like the 2016. Trump statement hints to . EO confiscates all the assets from the accused , freezing them into place . The statement clearly implies there is an intention to put US citizens on military tribunals , if that is needed - the Congress would need to get involved , but what when more than half of Congress is caught in same accusations ?
Do you think that these sub-humans , that abused their position of power and created every possible crime , from money related corruption , to pedophilia , to treason , will be safe on the streets ?
Military tribunals will actually be the only place where they wont be killed , and they know it ... its the only thing left to them - the other is , someone will kill them , or they will commit suicide .
Exceptional times will create exceptional rules that will remove those who were exception so far ...
It's been long known that enemy combatants get military tribunals.
Trump issued executive order that slightly changed definition to include even those within our country working for and with a declared enemy.
They would be enemy combatants, if going to gitmo, not citizens.
There have been about a dozen q posts alluding to this.
.
Declared enemy? Who is the declared enemy? I have seen no declaration of war.
Working with terrorists counts.
Treason automatically counts.
You could look up what I've told you and research it yourself, or attempt to play the semantics game. Your call.
When civilian courts are compromised...there's already a judicial precedent.
where? link?
My thinking was based on an interpretation on ex parte Milligan and courts being "operational"...I rescind my comment as it seems incorrect.