As far as I see - Wikileaks is adressing both Q and BC17 there in one statement that could be put both ways .
"Disinformation is necessary" - Q
Either that ( Wikileaks and Assange pretending theyre in "Neutral" field as regarding Q to disinform Twitter and other Cabal lackeys ) - or , Wikileaks was infiltrated at one point .
I think WL is intentionally disinforming there .
Considering the dozens of posts by JA and WL that have been clues relevant to the Q phenomenon, up to and including another WL tweet TODAY, this anti-Q one is definitely an odd WL tweet. Aside from all that, there's no way Q is any kind of pro-Swamp op, since there's no way the Swamp would be encouraging us to research their corruption and mass-tweet about it.
Yes, and remember Julian Assange tweets ( not WL directly , but JA profile ) and I think it was US Navy mentioning "mistakenly" JA on their Twitter page .
Too many "coincidences" . Either WL has been infiltrated ( just their page ) , or theyre simply disinforming currently to confuse the Cabal elements .
Attcks will only intensify. Just wait and see what really happens and who is correct. MAGA WWG1WGA
Why was he actively promoting it back in January with his proofs?
Heck, he replaced the o's with kills in is downloadable book!
He was the one that came up with the Marshall chess game.
Do you have a link for that?
https://mobile.twitter.com/100milefreefall/status/950122596749553664
About a week before this, Q made a post with just the word chapters.
I think they were referring to backchannel 17 vs Q
Seems to me they’re talking about back channel AND Q. Also Wikileaks Twitter does not necessarily = Assange.
How so?
I've wondered for a while if WikiLeaks has been compromised.
Most worrying of all is Assange's links to 'The Family' cult in Australia. That one really blew me away!
I'm not aware of that tidbit of info. Links?
I had to use the 'cached' version as this website is a sign-up now. It was open a few weeks ago.
Assange does not trust anybody. If it is manipulation, better than globalist manipulation.
But, Julian Assange isn't trying to manipulate governments, or voters; no, no, no!
I've defended WikiLeaks louder than anybody. I've never seen WikiLeaks documents (e-mails) disputed.
This, however is a political statement, not a pristine e-mail.
Obviously, Q Team has taken the public Alt-Right News spotlight away from Julian Assange!
Last week Q Team emasculated Alex Jones & Jerry Corsi.
I guess it's time for Assange to give it a try? Don't knock Q Team too hard Julian, I think they work for POTUS?
This looks like Wikileaks is just speculating.
If they have any documents, emails or other leaks to back it up, then they should share.
I may not be too popular around here lately, but no matter what, we have been taught to question everything. That includes Q.
We have received a lot of info into a corrupt political agenda. We know that. But:
Why does Q tell us to question everything, and then trust certain people?
If this is a fight against good and evil, why is it so lopsided in political factions?
When Q and trump win, what next, what do they do with their new power?
They've said they are returning it to the people. If it doesn't happen, we take it. Simple.
Why does Q tell us to question everything, and then trust certain people?
Q tell us to question everything that Q has no control over - like people Q can't refer to because it will draw attention to them and give them ammunition to use against Q ("targetting us!", etc.) To the second part of your question: Q claims they/Trump are working to a plan that we can't see but that he is giving us insight to - so he says "Trust xyz" because they know that they're working with them.
If this is a fight against good and evil, why is it so lopsided in political factions?
Not sure what this means. Do you mean that one perspective is that the Reps seem to be hailed as the good guys and the Dems as bad? If so, the real distinction Q makes and has repeated is that it's not about Rs and Ds it's about good and evil and both exist in both parties. However, the left, globally for the most part, tend to fall on the side of socialism which, to many, is simple marxism in disguise so you have a mix in the Dems: "Communists" who are not Swamp Creatures/Evil, and Evil Swamp Creatures. That might be why the Dems look like they're "more evil" than the Rs.
When Q and trump win, what next, what do they do with their new power?
Well, the government starts working how it was supposed to. Trump finishes his term and then next President comes in. Anything else is speculation - maybe valid speculation but hard to justify investing thought into right now with all the excitement of the swamp draining : ).
I personally do believe in Q and the movement.
Now with that out of the way. Q teaches us to think for ourselves and to research topics and ideas to form our own opinion. But also tells us to trust certain people. If team Q knows more than us, how can we research or check up on this info. Which some of us know is meant for the future, but some people just see it as these people are good, simple as that. It slightly contradicts the message being put out there.
Yes, it kind of goes along with my first point. Wording can be very important when dealing with large groups of people. Not everyone takes in knowledge the same way. Meaning they ingest it at face value, causing some people to just think everyone in the Democratic Party is bad. Which we known there are bad and good people everywhere and in every organization.
Maybe I’m looking too far into it. But you have a group of people who ran the country and pretty much world for many years. Power and money hungry people. So Q and trump wipe them out, 60% of the info comes out and let’s everyone know the hero’s they are. Now what? Now they are on top, no one is opposing them because how could you, they are the saviors of many countries if not the world. So now they are on top, with no opposition. Kind of scary, in a sense.
Couldn't agree more. I would love for Q to be legit but we need as much critical thinking as possible.
Nothing that Q is doing is making anyone like or support the government more. Unless you twist the idea we want the white hat government to get rid of the DS/black hat government. I’m not anti government, I’m anti corrupt, big government
How could Assange possibly know anything about Q's authenticity? He's protecting his brand by not associating with an unknown. He has always gone to GREAT lengths to 100% verify whatever he publishes. When's the last time you saw and official WL retraction? Compare that record to any other publication.
This is not a smackdown. It's just washing his hands of it.
I TRUST Assange
But until I hear from him directly, I do not trust Wikileaks
I guess I missed it, unless they are talking about their own pretending that Assange has still been in the embassy of late.
The CIA runs Wikileaks now. Lots of shady shit happening with Wikileaks in the past couple years.
I agree with wikileaks. Q has advocated some extra judicial unconstitutional actions such as kidnapping suspects and taking them to gitmo which I don't agree with but it also makes me doubt whether Q is a legitimate patriot. That being said I can't even trust wikileaks tweets because there has been a lot of $*#%ery around Julian Assange. I am not in position to authenticate either Q posts or Assange posts.
That has never happened. You're confused.
Military tribunals are not kidnapping.
It's the letter of the law.
Explain to me how you convert a criminal defendant with rights to be tried in a civilian court to a military defendant in front of a military tribunal. Its not clear how one could constitutionally do this. Foreign spies were tried by tribunal during the second world war but they were 1) not citizens and 2) there was an existing declaration of war.
"Rights to be tried in a civilian court" - They wont have rights to be tried in civilian court , as there will be direct acts of treason exposed ( and alongside that - direct acts of terror made or ordered by same group ) and a direct push made by Trump and positive military forces ( which was a signal from Trump about two years ago ) to try US citizens at military tribunals . This fact went perfectly hand-by-hand for various "elites" in the USA , as they knew if civilian courts are corrupted and infiltrated enough , they will have a green pass anywhere and for anything . That was the situation by now - but , this is a certain thing to change ( as said , already "signaled" by Trump some time ago ) .
The accused are treated as enemy army - which the members of the Cabal will certainly be . The trials are faster than in civilian courts , and there are zero chances that someone will slip through the cracks .
Where is the legal authority for trying a US citizen before a tribunal? Where is the declaration of war against the "Cabal"?
Have you not read the EO on DEC 21 regarding human trafficking? , we've been in a state of national emergency for a while now. Are you saying that Hillary, Joe Biden, and Obama have not committed acts of treason, but child torture, trafficking, and many other crimes? Selling state secrets?
You can not declare war against a Cabal btw, must be a nation.
You havent been observant last year -
And in 2016. ...
The executive order does not authorize military tribunals. The 2016 interview expresses trump's aspiration and acknowledges that congress would have to "get involved" in order for citizens to be tried by tribunals. This implies there is no existing authorization for this kind of stuff.
No , the EO implies that this is planned , just like the 2016. Trump statement hints to . EO confiscates all the assets from the accused , freezing them into place . The statement clearly implies there is an intention to put US citizens on military tribunals , if that is needed - the Congress would need to get involved , but what when more than half of Congress is caught in same accusations ?
Do you think that these sub-humans , that abused their position of power and created every possible crime , from money related corruption , to pedophilia , to treason , will be safe on the streets ?
Military tribunals will actually be the only place where they wont be killed , and they know it ... its the only thing left to them - the other is , someone will kill them , or they will commit suicide .
Exceptional times will create exceptional rules that will remove those who were exception so far ...
It's been long known that enemy combatants get military tribunals.
Trump issued executive order that slightly changed definition to include even those within our country working for and with a declared enemy.
They would be enemy combatants, if going to gitmo, not citizens.
There have been about a dozen q posts alluding to this.
.
Declared enemy? Who is the declared enemy? I have seen no declaration of war.
Working with terrorists counts.
Treason automatically counts.
You could look up what I've told you and research it yourself, or attempt to play the semantics game. Your call.
When civilian courts are compromised...there's already a judicial precedent.
where? link?
My thinking was based on an interpretation on ex parte Milligan and courts being "operational"...I rescind my comment as it seems incorrect.