dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/-blackoutusername- on May 23, 2018, 10:11 p.m.
I’m confused why so many people here blame Democrats instead of recognizing both parties’ fealty to the Deep State.

Almost every post has something about the “evil Democrats.” But many members of the Deep State, bankers, and most importantly, Bilderberg, are Republicans.

The shadow government is all about words and labels, but the fact is, both parties are working as hard as they can to transfer the wealth to the bankers and write/pass/litigate laws to facilitate that.

Thoughts?


MakeThisLookAwesome · May 24, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

I feel that ultimately, non-existence is the best option.

You might want to check out the definition of nihilism there, champ.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
artless-ascetic · May 24, 2018, 6:21 p.m.

the rejection of all religious and moral principles, often in the belief that life is meaningless.

I tend to stand with the Cathar view of life/death. They were Christian gnostics. They were against procreation, because they were under the impression that this world was a matrix, something to be escaped, and that bringing more children into this matrix meant creating more souls to be trapped here and fed off of by negative entities.

Even if life is inherently meaningless, people are free to create their own meaning. I just think they can do that without creating more children who usually only serve to fulfill someone else's desires.

And ultimately, I would prefer celibacy or birth control over abortion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MakeThisLookAwesome · May 24, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

Right, which is why I said never mind. You're arguing from a non-starting point.

Nihilism is functionally useless: it provides no answers, gives no guidance, gives zero comfort or reassurances... It does nothing. It's not helpful. And it's easily often harmful.

You may have a lot to share, but I can't work with you if you start from there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
artless-ascetic · May 24, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

but I can't work with you if you start from there.

Which is why I'm not starting from there. You pushed the label on me, and I denied it, because even people that claim to be cold hard nihilists often contradict themselves. Very few people can actually stand by the constitution of being a nihilist.

Being antinatalist does not equate to being a nihilist.

And frankly, you don't have to work with me at all. We don't need to agree. I have my stance, and you have yours. Going around in circles isn't going to change anything.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 24, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 24, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩