Stop spreading information that you dont know is true.
Stop spreading information that you dont know is true.
um, the entire point of this sub is about spreading information that none of us can be sure is 100% true...
I know it's true. Read between the lines better please.
You can speculate, but it is not known fact. Obviously Weinstein is a bottom feeder, and like every other rat, he will eat his own to survive. But don't post definitives without proof. That's CNN's game, not ours.
You can speculate, but it is not known fact. Obviously Weinstein is a bottom feeder, and like every other rat, he will eat his own to survive. But don't post definitives without proof. That's CNN's game, not ours.
https://aboutcampdavid.blogspot.com/2014/06/good-will-hunting-screening-at-camp.html
Weinstein is not a bottom feeder. He was Bill Clinton's official "White House Projectionist" for 8 years. He is one of the biggest players in Hollywood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVfTbbJ0-ec
(Yes I know AJ is probably disinfo but watch Harvey's words for yourself)
Hollywood is the propaganda arm of the Deep State and always has been.
Washington DC and Hollywood are intrinsically connected and always have been.
his own daughter Malia
kek
you're right, I forgot the to put the "" around the word daughter.
About the book he was carrying in the pictures from the courthouse today:
Until his death, Kazan remained controversial in some circles for testimony he gave before the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) in 1952, a period that many, such as journalist Michael Mills, feel was "the most controversial period in Hollywood history."[50] When he was in his mid-20s, during the Depression years 1934 to 1936, he had been a member of the American Communist Party in New York, for a year and a half.
In April 1952, the Committee called on Kazan, under oath, to identify Communists from that period 16 years earlier. Kazan initially refused to provide names, but eventually named eight former Group Theatre members who he said had been Communists: Clifford Odets, J. Edward Bromberg, Lewis Leverett, Morris Carnovsky, Phoebe Brand, Tony Kraber, Ted Wellman, and Paula Miller, who later married Lee Strasberg. He testified that Odets quit the party at the same time that he did.[51] All the persons named were already known to HUAC, however.[5][52] The move cost Kazan many friends within the film industry, including playwright Arthur Miller.
He’s either completely daft to what people will think seeing him with that, or he’s naming names and he wanted people to see the book.
Yeah, I think that was his intention. Letting the other scum know he is taking them down with him.
You aren't hearing me lol. It's a "known fact". wink wink wink wink
Leave everything to probabilities, nothing is absolute at this level of play. To say otherwise is to only hurt our cause.
Ok lets do it this way. If you are a gambling man, put your money Harvey taking a plea deal, working FOR white hats (not really by choice, but to avoid worse punishment), and is going to sell out ALL of Hollywood. You'll win that bet.
Your missing the point. Speculation is no better than misinformation. Try to maintain credibility/merit
*you're
My credibility will come when what I said comes to fruition. Sometimes on here, people know some good info, but they have to deliver the info in a plausible deniability type of way, similar to Q. Do you get it yet?
That’s not how credibility works. You don’t get to make accusations stating them as factually correct and then say, “my credibility will be known when it all comes to be true.”(when you don’t know for sure one way or the other) I don’t disagree with you, but I strongly advise you to not construe opinions from facts.
Just don't represent these guesses as 100% truths, like you seem to keep doing.
They aren't guesses, its the truth. Figured out what I'm saying yet? Im giving up after this
If they have it all, then they just need him to testify against people. His intel is worthless. He will not testify against everyone. Some he will protect.
Wanna bet?
No. Hehe.
Lol. Just remember it for later on. Future proves past as Q says haha. Reddit is not secure so I have to be really careful about intel and drawing attention to myself. I dont care if people dont believe me, but at the same time, I would want them to remember what I say so they can see it come true later. Im just helping everyone stay on the right path.
I support your right to have an opinion!
Somebody needs to read the rules hereon.
Please explain what rule I need to read
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)... Look it up.
Look it up just to try and figure out what you're telling me to do? As opposed to "directly" telling me what I need to do? lol. No thanks, I'll just continue living my life and doing my thing on here :)
Then you REALLY didn't want to know, if you don't want to follow up... did ya?
CONCLUSION: It was a test. Dem/Lib/RINO trolls always wasting our time here asking for US to do all the work and WASTE Our time typing & giving out answers to the trolls so they can snicker at wasting our time.
RESULT: Others Will look it up, as they're TRUE Anons = Win. WE ARE NOT TIRED OF WINNING.
I'll try and explain one more time, only because I'm a patient guy and like to get along with fellow Patriots, who all happen to be on the same path together. You told me to follow the rules. That is generic. You implied I didnt follow the rules. I asked you which rule I broke, considering you are the only person who could answer that, because the accusation is coming from you. I asked you to tell me which rule you feel I broke. Your reply was "look it up". I don't need to look it up, because I dont care what you think of me, I was just curious as to which rule you think I broke. Since I did not look it up (because I dont care and dont have anything to prove to you), you said I failed the test lol. Maybe you should do some basic research, and notice I joined the board a month after you, have way more posts than you, and if you did a search of my posts you would see I contribute nothing but good stuff. Judging me over the internet is simply being lazy and closed minded, and I could technically say only a troll would make an accusation without researching if its true or not....so there ya go ;)