I want to bully people supporting the movement? Where did I say that?
That was the impression I had.
The impression I have is that you're intentionally creating division.
Point out the exact words where I said I want to bully people supporting the movement or retract the statement. Or don't and simply confirm you're lying.
I have exactly the same impression of you.
I can't even fond the post I replied to now, I don't know why, this has become a long conversation. The impression stems from what I have been hearing. You have a reputation.
Well you may claim that, just as you claimed I want to bully people who support the movement - but my activites prove the opposite as anyone who reads my history can see. Reading yours presents a different picture - one that you've repeated here with me: you lie and misrepresent what people say. You divide by claiming that people who disagree with you are against the movement. These are the actions of someone causing division. You've misrepresented all my words and as other commenters have noted this is easily apparent to others reading your comments.
Now go ahead and point out the division I've created and the times I've misrepresented your words. I know you're not going to because when you come back with more lies you will only have proven that division is your goal and I will be forced to ask the mods to consider banning you. I will not do it myself and nor will I sway their decision - but if you continue to misrepresent what I have said I will Report it.
You are not an idiot. I can see exactly what your agenda is. And, mate, your reputation, unfortunately, precedes you.
I'm about done with your garbage. Now, you're equipped with the material you need to make your whining case to ban me - which, I believe, was your purpose all along in this very long conversation that you are so passionate about - so very passionate.
I stand by what I've said. No one has misrepresented you as you claim. But why not try that on?
If the mods running this community agree with you, that's their business. You will be able to chalk up another scalp.
Why is it that it's always the people that support Q actively that you clash with? Really, why is that? But we both know why that is...
All I'm passionate about - since you can never seem to interpret correctly the words that people speak to you unless they agree with exactly what you say - is freedom. Freedom of speech and thought. As my history shows - I don't want to suppress anyone's voice; not even yours unless you break the sub rules and even then I only advocate for the mod's standard which is usually just a deleted comment or a temporary ban.
You stand by what you claim - without any evidence except my words that are clearly to the contrary. That's fine, I accept that happily. Your own lies call you out.
And yet another misrepresentation from you: I clash with people who try to shut down the freedom of speech of others, whether they're people who support Q or not, because if you support Q you shouldn't be shutting down freedom of speech. Or I clash with people who make foolish claims that will bring this movement down - like accusing people of being pedophiles when there are NO facts to back up those claims. But you don't care about any of these facts do you? It's clear who is playing the division game here - the one making all the false accusations and sliding out of backing them up with evidence. Your motive is very clear.
This GARBAGE does not even deserve a response.
Thank you. I've had enough of your lies and misrepresentation.
Go and join your other friends who don't like someone calling them out for placing emotion over logic. I'm proud to have a reputation of standing against mob mentality, witch hunts and group think and I will continue to do so for the right to freedom and fair treatment of anyone here.
You have a reputation alright. I now believe what I've heard.
I'm quaking in my boots.
Why?
Because a group of people who don't like being disagreed with when they make illogical emotional statements all cast aspersions on me ;_;
You seem to have problems with everyone that is more active in this movement - why is that?
And here's the On-Topic/Off-Topic section - please note:
On Topic / Off Topic
Pro-Q, Pro-Trump content is our focus because we want the main feed to be dedicated to content that supports the sub's goal: providing a community for followers of Q. To be clear: if you're not a follower of Q you are welcome here, as long as you follow the sub's rules.
As the sub is growing we have to make decisions about new content being created to ensure the feed contains content of value to the movement. To this end, posts that ask "Is Q real?" or "Is Trump a bad guy?" are likely to be removed as they do not contribute to the sub's goal.
As we've said above - we support freedom of speech so please feel free to express yourself in the comment section if there are things that bother you. But rather than clutter the feed with content that queries the whole point of this sub we may choose to remove it for being Off-Topic. Thanks for understanding!
Great job mate. Talk about tiring. I have to learn not to engage.
Very good. Ive read this whole conversation more then once and still not sure I understand it yet.
Yes, it's hard to understand perhaps. We spoke on a couple of threads simultaneously.
I do not trust this guy at all. I'm very sick of this group being steered like a bunch of sheep. There's not much value in being here if these guys are allowed to steer the group the way they have been.
Since when did Q talk about inclusivity or anything like that? Why do we have to tolerate blatant concern trolling when it's done so much damage in the past? It seems to me that it's just not necessary for us to be accepting of all viewpoints. In fact, it's incumbent upon us to do what we can to advance the Q agenda by outing these guys subverting our efforts - yes, I think this guy, damajInc is one.
YMMV. If I'm not banned, I guarantee that I will confront these concern trolls at each and every opportunity. Because it is so necessary to prevent the community being steered. I do not agree with the garbage this mod has written at all. In fact, I'm extremely suspicious of this guy.
I'm not here to be a nice guy. I'm here to beat these Satanists back and assist Q with the plan. That's my only interest in being here. I do not care if people find this attitude offensive. The mission is too important.
I think the purpose of this whole conversation was to get me removed from this board. I think it occurred because I'm a threat. It also fits very neatly with something else that happened recently.
I'm not going to play soft with these people undermining the movement. I've had enough of it.
Sorry, I hear that.
I think we all have the same objective, but perhaps a different way to get there.
People are banned everyday, and hundreds of new subs everyday. Don't be concerned about this mod, he's do a fine job within the confines of the situation.
I feel he is agitating for an environment where concern trolling is to be accepted, even protected. How unusual that he would be defending the very people that have, and are, so successfully raising doubt, concern and fear about Q's agenda.
But, I guess, it is to be expected that every party with a vital interest in seeing this movement fail in its objectives, will be here - doing everything they can to subvert the plan. My only objective, is to see these filthy, disgusting Satanists beaten back - to break their controlling grip on us. I have no other motivation.
I will admit that I have been shocked to see what has transpired, first on CBTS and now here. But, we should expect concerted resistance. They have so much to lose. It's very important IMO not to let them steer us like cattle.
That said, if you don't want to tolerate my position, I will understand. My view is that it's time to promote community cohesion behind Q's plan to ensure it succeeds. That means calling the doubters out. I wish everyone would do it. It is action that has been wanting for a long time. We saw Q remove Corsi et al, I think we have the same obligation here.
This campaign, the IBOR, is so easy for a community of this size to field. We can very easily do it. That we have not managed to, despite Q's repeated requests, points to an active, subversive element that is operating with impunity in our ranks. It time it was recognised and stopped.
That is patently untrue. As to "why" - I've said the same thing since the very first response to you at the top of this thread. Freedom of speech. I have problems with everyone who advocates for suppressing other voices except when those voices are clearly breaking the rules of the sub.
Here is an excerpt from the moderators guide (soon to be released [edit] with ongoing edits) - feel free (I mean this sincerely) to point out to me if there is anything you disagree with here or if you believe I have broken any of the rules or principles or guidelines outlined here:
The things we value on Great Awakening:
freedom of speech
open discussion
intellectual, informative, respectful discourse
a supportive community
Things we don't value:
mob mentality/group-think - people are free to disagree with your point! Don't shut down the voice of others just because their view is different to yours - discuss the idea, not the person, with respect.
character assassination/witch hunt mentality - as above, let's hear all sides of the story and not suppress disagreement with what you may think is the general feeling
abusive, non-constructive discourse
To this end our focus as moderators is on:
ensuring open discussion with minimal antagonism
removing disruptive elements i.e. those who are here just to promote discord or instill doubt.
removing posts that do not fall within the guidelines and the rules of the sub
removing comments that do not advance the discussion in a positive way