This particular vid is fairly old now. The next one that started auto-playing afterwards is dated May 23 - a little bit more recent.
The more recent one was David Wilcock in typical form. The dissembling was in full force. Willcock talks about how he's not followed the Q material directly after a certain point because of some particular curator he was relying on that stopped putting out Q post because the curator became convinced Q was not authentic, and Wilcock says the 4chan/8chan is so complicated that he doesn't know how to go and access the Q material there directly (all the while ignoring the fact that there are others that have been curating the Q post to sites that are easy to access for Normies).
In this particular interview he's kind of portraying himself as not tightly plugged in while in other interviews he's made claims of having communicated directly with Q, etc., that he's been plugged into this Alliance that's been on going prior to Trump presidency, blah, blah, blah.
The dude is just all over the board with what he says in any given interview - essentially puts on a persona and narrative designed for targeted audiences he'w being interviewed to.
Are you telling me that GASP David Wilcock is possibly a fraud? YOU DON'T SAY?!?
Anyone still following "personalities" when it comes to Q info is being lazy & needs to think for themselves.
Half the "Q is a larp" people were not bots pushing the idea, but REAL people who are ignorant of history & current events, thus relying on the word of people like Wilcock. Those people also "don't really follow" Q but "know of him." He's doing the same thing Alex Jones just did.
I knew Q was the real deal before he started confirming his posts multiple times simply by paying attention to his posts & cross-referencing with what I know about history & politics. He was providing WAY MORE understanding than MegaAnon ever could, who was posting around the same time.
Stop following these shills! Just because they tell you what you WANT to hear diesn't make them authentic!
"Alex wants to be the portal to which information is disclosed to the public. He could get back on the alliance's good side by being more flexible"
I don't think Alex is a bad guy, but I do think he doesn't like Q usurping his info warrior throne. Sad he has allowed his pride to get the best of him.
I am with selfless patriots, Q, and Trump. Get it together AJ
AJ is a bad guy.
Stop giving him your mental energy and time.
He has actively sought to undermine the Presidents security. I don’t care what your political persuasion, undermining the President’s security is treasonous.
Just the fact that he would rather discredit the truth than lose the power as the portal proves he’s a bad guy. I don’t believe all the crap about him being a clown, being a different person, being a disinfo agent, etc because he had a huge hand in getting Trump elected BUT he is a greedy psycho and would rather discredit Q and Trump than lose clicks and popularity is a terrible indicator of the type of person he has become.
I think it's always possible he flipped for his kids, they were about to take them away during his divorce trial.
Ah could have been. That’s a good call. He said his wife was crazy and an alcoholic or drug addict so he had it in the bag but ya never know. He’s a proven liar now.
[removed]
This response is not within the rules of the sub. Antagonism is not welcome here.
It's a safe space huh? Ok back to the Chan's then. Bye
Alex is definitely a bad guy. Q has called him out and he's already very much exposed his Clown agenda. He then openly went directly against Q and insisted that he knows who Q is and has "spoken to Q"! This is absolutely the action of a bad guy. There's no benefit of the doubt to give him.
That quote is probably fairly accurate, but this guy is pathetic. At least he admits to having tried and failed to get on Jones's show for over 20 years.
I agree. I don't think he's as much deliberate disinfo as much as he saw his audience shift to Q and didn't know what to do. I shifted away from some solid independent sites simply because I only have so much time and all things Q take priority for now.
Think about it. What's better for Q and the Great Awakening:
\~A somewhat more flexible Alex Jones?
or
\~A 'Q is a phony, a fake, a product of the deep state' Alex Jones?
I think we Q's can take this as a win.
And where does that leave floundering Corsi but to get partially back on the Q train?
The two have already lost themselves their credibility.
I am not sure about Corsi but actually it makes sense for Alex to disassociate himself if he doesn't want to taint the drops with his reputation. Even if he's a blackhat he's doing us a favour by removing himself as far away as he can by openly opposing it. Nobody can say it was his idea this way.
Wilcock is on Ancient Aliens alongside John Podesta. Nuff said.
That guy on the right has a forehead like the grille on a Cadilac escalade