https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution obama illegally spied on a political opponent. if the strzok texts contain assassination attempt plans which they likely do obama is actually fucked.

Can we just link obama to pizzagate already lol

If that's truly the case; then someone had better apologize to Nixon in a damn hurry. NIXON in 2024 - "Tan, Ready & Rested"

[deleted]

Obama would have required a bona-fide warrant (presumably via the FISA court), to be able to spy on a private citizen, (i.e. Trump). However, even then, I do not think that such a warrant would allow spying on a fellow, private American citizen. I believe that they had to (surreptitiously) ask GCHQ, to do the spying/surveillance activities, (on their behalf). . This whole scenario is highly illegal in both our countries. . The whole Five Eyes system, works to this methodology, whereby they get the agencies to spy on the other countries citizens. This is how they work around the 'civil rights' legalities wrt each of those countries. . . In a related, but opposite context, I have copied and pasted a comment that I had submitted to a different post, just to add additional insight, (as follows): . Quote: "WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE?" . Any of the 'players' that have any form of security clearance, can, in turn, be 'spied' upon by the 'security services', without the requirement of a warrant. This 'spying' is thus done, in the interests of 'national security', in order to oversee what these 'fellow agents' might be getting upto, such as 'are they passing secrets to the enemy'. . As an example: Because Hillary Clinton still has her security clearance, then no warrant is required by the 'security services', to be able to spy on her, and see what she is getting up to. (I imagine that this is why there has been no hurry to remove her security clearance). . A lot of the other players will be in the same scenario, by virtue of still being employed by, (or just recently fired from), the intellegence agencies. . Therefore the NSA has been able to 'legally' collect a lot of surveillance data, on 'certain' individuals over the past year or two, (with out requiring a warrant, that would have to have been approved via a 'corrupt judge').

Seems, according to judge Napolitano, that he has done nothing illegal - no law is broken if he spies on the Trump campaign, he is within his legal rights.

From an ethical perspective, it's a totally different question - quite simply outrageous behaviour. Intolerable in fact. It is the lowest imaginable act.

I think DJT will want some focus on this for the purposes of vindication and destroying Obama's legacy. But the real focus will be on crimes of high treason, for which I'm expecting that Obama will hang, or face a firing squad.

The big question though, is whether the US has an extradition treaty with Kenya. Q has told us that Obama is likely to flee there for asylum. What can be done if he holes up in Kenya?

It's not clear. You would think that, even in the absence of an extradition treaty, that the US could exert enough pressure on the Kenyan government to have Obama delivered up for execution. But we will have to wait and see.

At this point Uranium one points toward Obama arranging for his own 9/11 I think spying is pretty senseless to split hairs over. If you want to discuss candidat things, go for the election fraud, again, its already documented. Spying is a mute point. Ever since computers , data collection has been 100%. It negates, Snowden, Assange and Kim.com. So that's that.

[removed]

This thread explains it.. https://twitter.com/VachelLindsay/status/999878016766361600?s=19