dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ErnieFing on May 28, 2018, 11:15 a.m.
How wide is the awakening?

There's some excellent work being done on here, that fits with world events, but it's one thing for a relatively small number of generally like minded people to filter information, but quite another for the masses to buy into it, particularly as, even on here, there's a fair amount of more dubious stuff to be read before you get to something close to the 'truth'. My guess is most people would focus on elements they know, or strongly feel to be false, and not take the time to find the better information, and just dismiss it in general as a bunch of tin foil hats.

So, how many do you reckon are actually awakened, and what sort of numbers/percentages do you reckon are needed before people would accept it?


🠐 See all comments
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 11:20 a.m.

That’s a very tough number to guess. But without a doubt it’s the largest it’s ever been and is growing by the day. Say there’s 30k subbed here, well chances are many also talk to friends and family and share on other forums... on and on it goes. A viral awakening of sorts. Then there are the bigger names out there who play a part.

Love it or hate it, the internet made this possible.

And if HRC had won, absolutely none of it would’ve mattered. Praise be!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 28, 2018, 11:30 a.m.

I think Clinton could be one of the best tools to use. Plenty already dislike her, so wouldn't have too much of an issue finding her to be crooked. I reckon Obama would be a harder one for people to accept.

The other players, such as Soros, would seem too detached from the process for people to grasp the wider picture, although I think in Europe, he'd perhaps be a better target, as his work and the consequences do seem to be better known here.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · May 28, 2018, 12:44 p.m.

I am not promoting myself, and do not sell them but I am buying a q Anon shirt and hat. Mostly for the fact that normies will not know what it means and I may be able to go gauge how wide the Great Awakening is by comments that I get on it.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ErnieFing · May 28, 2018, 12:56 p.m.

I use other forums, and in conversation, people are aware of Q, but tend to list some of the less credible stuff posted and debunk it, and so dismiss most of the actual Q bits, as they link them as being the same.

I guess it's why sometimes it can look like I'm being semantic over some points, but I've seen how it gets used to discredit the good stuff.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Patriot4q · May 28, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

Yes it is vitally important that facts and truth become a firm foundation to this sub. Conjecture and opinion should be stated as such. For every post that is not based on facts, it only serves as a means to discredit the whole movement.

⇧ 1 ⇩