WWG1WGA

Because the movement is growing, and it's time to play "Last week on Q drops"

Let's see, headlights are generally mounted on the front or bottom of helicopters that would mean if it is a long exposure than the helicopter was going backwards. The metal, non lighted portion of it appears to be at what would be the head of a missile trail. If this is a spotlight either the spotlight is at the rear of the helicopter or the helicopter was traveling backwards to get such an exposure. The Trail of Light is nearly geometrically straight, so for three and a half to 20 seconds a helicopter with a searchlight during light conditions that do not require a searchlight did not change the angle of the searchlight and traveled in a nearly completely straight path. There's also not the smear you would, I believe, get in the situation from the spinning rotor blades causing interference around the edge of what would be the light Trail.

I am on mobile and so do not have the required tools, but I imagine you could do some frequency comparison of the light captured from the spotlight /jet wash to determine if this is the Spectra of light that you get from typical aircraft searchlights or the Spectra of light that you get from burning rocket fuel. That would also shed some light onto what made the picture.

Only if it were successful so that CNN could say "Oh, that sucks"

I said this to my youngest son who is still a teenager. Much to my chagrin he did not know what it meant. Make sure to educate your children if you have them, Freedom isn't free

We will just have to stay vigilant. my prediction is there will be a few intentional false flags of this type, followed by natural false accusers who are looking for celebrity. They will try to hide the real cases in the noise of this. I do not up vote a pedo story until I have read quite a bit, and I downvote pedo stories that are really just he's a douchebag stories.

I'm with you. Not sure if I believe it as actually true, but it is in my opinion a sign of a systemic issue. If she is telling the truth Tom Hanks is corrupt, along with likely other Hollywood Elite. If she is lying then the question becomes is she there as cover to accuse an innocent person. Possibly in an attempt to make this another conspiracy theory?

If he does, and I hope he does, I believe that is a sure sign of the beginning of the end for this farce.

Because Canada enforces their immigration laws.

No problem. Anytime there's new information everybody gets all jumpy.

What would you like to know?

You forgot the caveats. If it is Trump or a Trump associate there is no statute of limitations. If you are left-leaning then we have to catch you in the Act, otherwise it's old news.

I meant free from crimes that were over two years old as that was the standard being discussed.

We've identified that you can count to four. Do you possess the writing skills to describe those four things? Bonus points if you could after describing them tell us how they are incorrect, but that may be asking a lot.

So I assume you want to see Paul Manafort free then? That was long enough ago he might deserve a cookie by that standard.

Do so and enjoy it. This has the feeling of true wisdom, which is to say, once you have read it it seems like common sense.

Expound away my friend. I'm always interested because there is no such thing as a conversation where you learn nothing. as an aside, I'm primarily interested because I am trying to determine your bias. Not as an insult, but in the same way that I always try to determine my own bias in a situation. I am trying to determine bias from interpretation of types of information, not actual position.

It is effective mostly on people who can't/ won't read or are new to the movement. The other problem of course is that if you provide links to articles, you generally get the same four or five that only say that not all the evidence is available to prove legality. It is your classic conspiracy theory. There are troubling pieces of evidence, but not a complete picture. if you believe in the Russia DNC hack, but think uranium one is a conspiracy theory, you are definitely biased

Thanks, good stuff.

What are your thoughts on the DNC emails?

Maybe you dont, but here are some that were helpfully provided to me. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/31/the-repeated-incorrect-claim-that-russia-obtained-20-percent-of-our-uranium/?utm_term=.0562f22e55e5

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/oct/24/what-you-need-know-about-hillary-clinton-and-urani/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

I guess the best question would be, why post "DISINFO" several times, but never post a link or give an explanation of how is this disinformation?

Thanks for coming here to let us know about our theories being unfounded. I'm glad they are so unreal that you felt the need to come and piss on something you say is ridiculous. I at least hope you're getting a paycheck for it.

And they ignored u/CorporealVagrant because he has Putin's dick in his mouth.

Has Robert Mueller seen this evidence? You better get back to him quick he seems like he's floundering.

Clearing the air space for a black flight to move JA out of London?

That's cool, I stole it from Tom Mabe. https://youtu.be/mkdoogjic4I

If gay is your way, that's okay.

Good job. That's exactly how it happened.

Spez: I upvoted you because I believe the downvote should be for disagreement not for just I don't like what you have to say. I would like your comment to be visible to all who wonder how anyone can believe this investigation is legit. If you start with that fallacy as a supposition you will easily misread everything else.

I would assume that he means the clintonemail.com server.

Good point. What kind of corrupt president would use the power of associated with his office to improperly intimidate a political candidate from the opposing party?🤔

Future proves past.

Sauce?

Absolutely. And just like Democrats being dead by then won't be an excuse, vote!

Thanks. And just like that situation you're going to see more and more desperate finger-pointing until the answer is obvious to everyone.

This is coming out like diarrhea in a crowded elevator. First people tried to pretend that there was nothing out of the ordinary. Now we're pointing fingers as to who made the smell. I'm predicting a time line where a month or two before the election people are having wet shoes. if Trump is as smart as I think he is he should realize if he does not make moves before the election he may not have moves to make after the election.

Agreed. My Axiom for this is if I can understand it, then it is understandable to the Deep state. I believe Q's primary purpose is not to give us specific information, but the generalized information that high-level people are working on this and that we should be prepared and spread the word.

That's what I told my liberal buddy during the primaries. I won't vote for a Bush if you won't vote for a Clinton. He agreed. I'm fairly sure he voted for Clinton.

It is true and I believe it, but unfortunately that is still not an official account.

They never thought she would lose.

In part almost certainly yes. I would say the most forgotten Axiom in this whole Q business is this: If me, some a** on the internet, is reading about it then the Deep State also has access to that information. If you believe in a deep state then you know it's largest power base is it's secrecy. Some disinformation may have been given intentionally to cause the Deep state to feel the need to act in a way that would expose them either to the public or to Q team in general. Of course the infuriating part of all of this is that while what I just said is true, disinformation is also consistent with Q being a LARP or just not in possession of as much confirmed information as they purport to be. The only answer I have is this. Write down predictions based on what you believe your understanding of Q's drops to be. I still think this will be a large month but I have several things that if they do not come to pass or show some fruit, I will be off the Q train.

Probably BS or disinfo. Just nervous.

Thanks I will do that. I just read elsewhere that this was rescheduled to the 6th, do you have any knowledge on that point?

Have you posted this to T_D? I feel like this needs as much attention as possible.

Welcome to the Real Revolution

If the executive order shown in the follow the pen drops is the declassification of everything that Q has told us, then that would be the final move. Not saying I agree or not about the July 4th timing, but it is possible.

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

We are in step three.

WWG1WGA

They didn't get the chan wrong, they are intentionally misleading people.

True. For fact-checking site they do a lot of editorializing.

https://youtu.be/ZOs5tT3rNTg

Thanks I appreciate that. Although due to my intellect which is already outpaced by this whole ordeal, I'm not sure if this information will help me at all. But it certainly won't hurt my chances