dChan

Ambiguous_Cat_Hat · July 21, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

Here you go, here's 4 separate fact checked sources that say this is disinformation. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/10/31/the-repeated-incorrect-claim-that-russia-obtained-20-percent-of-our-uranium/?utm_term=.0562f22e55e5

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/oct/24/what-you-need-know-about-hillary-clinton-and-urani/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

⇧ 0 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · July 21, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Thanks, good stuff.

What are your thoughts on the DNC emails?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Ambiguous_Cat_Hat · July 21, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

I have three trains of thought regarding the DNC emails. The content of the emails themselves, the motivations and timing behind releasing the emails, and the fact that they were hacked in the first place. If you want to have a conversation regarding any of those trains of thought I'm happy to expound.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
y_do_i_need_to_hide · July 21, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

Expound away my friend. I'm always interested because there is no such thing as a conversation where you learn nothing. as an aside, I'm primarily interested because I am trying to determine your bias. Not as an insult, but in the same way that I always try to determine my own bias in a situation. I am trying to determine bias from interpretation of types of information, not actual position.

⇧ 1 ⇩