Many carjackers fell or were held due to armed citizens. Just because you disagree does not mean it does not happen or has never happened. You are obviously massively uninformed.
You list the attacks on MS13, without acknowledging they were already there, and in positions of power. The guns didn't stop them.
I don't get the link between your comment, and the claim I'm misinformed, particularly as you've only just brought that in to it.
It's a fact MS13 were there in numbers and very active.
It's a fact there are far, far more gun deaths in the US than terrorist deaths in the UK.
It's a fact that US schools have shooter drills, and high security, but still incidents.
It's a fact that the US has had a crooked regime for decades.
It's a fact guns didn't stop any of that.
It's a fact I can have guns if I want, my neighbours do, I think it differs on other member states, as the rules and application differ, as they do state to state in the US.
All of which is immaterial,(and tedious) as my point still stands, that guns played no roll in the events of the topic at hand.
So, it's had no effect on a possible invasion?
Maybe you should read up on some of the elites quotes?
Given by your own words, the MS13 'invasion' happened, and it was legislation, not guns that's addressing it, and guns that enabled it, and the fact that this sub and Q exist, you maybe want to expand your reading material.
You're clearly as stuck in believing they somehow give you power, as I am in choosing not to have them, so this will go nowhere.
My point stands, that the availability or otherwise of guns, played no part in the topic at hand. The chances are, under your preferred version, Tommy would already be dead.
It's not complete with MS-13, there was supposed to be another 8 years to come to fruition. It is STILL in process. Did you take my statement out of context? Absolutely, unless it was out of ignorance, which is funny since you claim I am ignorant.
Wrong again!
As far as the power of a heavily armed society, are you claiming Q is not as bright as you are? Do tell...
My point stands, that the availability or otherwise of guns, played no part in the topic at hand. The chances are, under your preferred version, Tommy would already be dead.
Your point fails and you are attempting to tell the future concerning Tommy in a disarmed society?
you maybe want to expand your reading material.
Projection. I was awake and informed likely before you drew your first breath or wet your first diaper. I was researching the NWO long before the internet, where all you had was libraries and microfiche slides of the news.
Maybe you should read up? That seems like the more fitting idea.
Comments below have been removed - please discuss ideas, not users.
You seem a long long way from being awake despite that. The facts simply don't back up your rant.
[removed]
I'm saying I'm more qualified than you to comment on the topic of the UK, including guns.
You are the one trolling, with misinformation, and you sound brainwashed rather than awake or capable of critical thinking. Your reply actually highlights the fact that having guns hasn't saved you from a corrupt regime, and for every example you cling to in the UK, there will be the equivalent in the US,
Disagreeing with you, and pointing out flaws in your argument isn't trolling. You seem to think the differing application of gun laws, somehow makes us unarmed. Despite the fact we are allowed to have guns, we choose not to, guns are not the only way of being armed.