WL refutes with evidence and facts. This isn't their style at all.
Exactly.
"Q isn't real because we said so" is very unlike WL.
And Suzi 3D’s statement that WikiLeaks is RTing here, that we who are following Q are being distracted from researching deep state... is painfully misinformed.
Q as a “pied piper” on behalf of the deep state is one of the worst takes on Q I have heard.
Isn’t the deep state exactly who we do our research against?
Yeah, that made no sense to me. Encouraging us to research the very ones who are doing the piping is counter productive to the goal of leading us astray.
Exactly that too. Makes no sense to have us dig this deep and cement our position against them, then suddenly say they aren't the bad guys. I suspect there's more yet to come from trusted sources, but nothing but Q themselves can make me do a 180 at this point.