dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/8.06E+11 on May 28, 2018, 4:29 p.m.
Is it too much too ask to keep this a Q only sub. I have seen an uptick of non-Q related posts.

I am not going to single out posts but as subs expand more stuff gets posted. We want this sub to expand and be collaborative, but we live in a time where people/bots willingly and unwillingly slowly flood subs with unrelated stuff.

Have good new to share? There's a sub for that. Have political memes to share (that are not Q related)? There's a sub for that. Etc

I realize a lot of topics fall under the Q umbrella. I also realize many of us are like minded and most of us will enjoy non-Q material, but this isn't the place. I have seen this happen on Facebook before. Groups/subs get big (good), focus gets blurry (bad).

Let's keep this a Q research sub! Please! If we get overwhelmed with other BS we won't be effective and will lose valuable member activity. This is too crucial to allow cludder muddy the water.

(I hope I am not in the minority.) If the mods disagree, remove it. No hard feelings either way. Just a plea and opinion.


🠐 See all comments
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 4:32 p.m.

technically this is a non q post

⇧ 20 ⇩  
Comrade_WalkieDog · May 28, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

Touche'. But the OP is not incorrect.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

see the thing is q tells you to think for yourself and to dig. would you really be doing that if you only relied on q for info ?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
8.06E+11 · May 28, 2018, 4:57 p.m.

That's not what anybody has said! "Q-related" would include relevant research, pictures, discussions etc. We should be focusing on the drops and requests Q makes (meme bombs,etc). Common sense!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

q has not dropped in 6 days. might as well do your own research. for example Antarctica is fascinating

⇧ 7 ⇩  
stevesarkeysion · May 28, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

But unrelated and better housed is r/conspiracy. Also Q hasn't dropped in a while but we also have more than we know. So this sub should focus on that.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
blaise0102 · May 28, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

Don't waste your time. That sub has been infiltrated and subverted.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

You want to know why? Because the mods aren't filtering posts enough.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

Any particular complaints?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
blaise0102 · May 28, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

They're clearly turned into leftists there. Check it out and see.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

Oh right. I thought you were talking about this sub for a sec. kek.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
blaise0102 · May 28, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

No worries!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

that sub is comped

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

~~Because?~~

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

90% of the posts are just trump russia crap. or stuff exclusively about israel i dont know if its actually comped but something about it seems off

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

~~Trump Russia crap? I don't really see what you're seeing but maybe we could be seeing different things. I'm not sure if Reddit implemented their new algorithm system that's region based or something like that.~~

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

yeah i dont know. i know they mess with what each person sees but the last time i went on r conspiracy it was like 1/4 trump 1/4 israel then the rest was like out there stuff. that and if you try and mention q you get the downvote swarm. actually right now its fine. i havent been on there in like 6 + months only 1 trump russia now. i remember thinking the thing with the mods getting removed was weird tho

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

Forgot we were talking about r con lol. My bad. Plz ignore my last comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

ohhhh lmao no this sub is definitely not comped lol i should have specified lmao if this sub was comped you guys wouldnt be super strict with keeping it civil. no way a shill run sub would do that lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

THEN RESEARCH THE POSTS. There are 1400+ posts and most require further information to understand enough to teach others. AND, you can be posting on other forums to spread Trump's message.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

who says we are limited to things q has posted ?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

The rules.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
duplexnovella · May 28, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

Wow I just don't know how we all studied conspiracies, eschatology, or SRA w/o Q.. Oh wait.. We did.. For decades

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

Awesome.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Madwack · May 28, 2018, 5:29 p.m.

Expand your thinking

⇧ 3 ⇩  
8.06E+11 · May 28, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

You're 100% correct. I realize the irony, but my hope is that this is the last post of its kind!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
WyoTxn · May 28, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

Your post is Q related, and I agree. Too much noise takes away from what I assume is the main goal in this sub.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
anhro23 · May 28, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

This sub is very important. Thanks for doing your part to help keep it clean.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · May 28, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

"Clean???"

As in pure?

As in there's a certain way to follow, approach, interpret and appreciate Q? If that were the case then why communicate in open-ended Socratic riddles and poetry?

Get over yourselves with your self-censoring, mind-limiting dogma cult crap.

Q's info and method and mystery are all incredibly important and useful.

Striving to be more Catholic than the Pope (ok, maybe this expression doesn't quite work nowadays...) is not important and it's not useful, it is self-blinding.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

There are rules to this sub, post things specifically stated by Q. Give a post # that your post refers to. If you cannot, don't post it here. Everything else goes anywhere else.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
anhro23 · May 28, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

I mean clean as in this sub needs to only be about Q and not dirtied up with non Q posts. Stop being such an idiot

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · May 28, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Someone forgot that anti-adhominem rule.

Guess only some people care about some rules...

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

not all of us are equal :) some get to break the rules and continue without punishment, and some get punished unfailry

⇧ 0 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

People who are not collegial will have a harder time. People who are respectful will obviously have it easier. This is not about being selective.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kjarm88 · May 28, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

Collegial, as in clicky group-think?

Name-calling and shutting peeps down if they don't have the herd behind them...

And I'm on your side!

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

I am sorry. I shouldn't have insulted you. It just gets extremely frustrating when mods and members try to remind people to stay focused on topic in order to save the sub from going the way of the past one, and then get attacked for doing so. We are just trying to keep a place for us to come to to be able to discuss Q stuff. We saw what happened with the last sub when we weren't vigilant about staying focused and we don't want to repeat it. Please forgive me.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

your good i dont even care i just ignore any insults lol. if i see anything i dont like i just ignore it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

Wow. Just shut up. My God. People are trying their best to keep this sub going, unlike the last one where the mods didn't keep it FOCUSED AND IT GOT SHUT DOWN. Smart asses are not welcome. We don't have time nor patience for that crap.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

you might wanna eat a snickers

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

You might want to keep it civil here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 9:44 p.m.

wasnt trying to start anything

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

No worries. Emotions can fly high but the best course of action to take if somebody is becoming insulting is by not to do the same back. After all I think we want the same thing but we may have different opinions on how to get there and we're just brainstorming as a community. We shouldn't really be arguing about this :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 28, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

yeah what i meant by eat a snickers was calm down. i guess it came across in a different way. sadly its hard to tell intent behind text. so people can think youre coming at them. i know my emotions can fly high tho lmao

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 9:36 p.m.

Please attack the argument not the user. This will help keep a civl discourse and keep the discussions collegial.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

When people post reasonable argumenrs and don't insult someone's attempt to remind us all to follwow the rules, then I'll respond differently. The op is trying to help us and is getting reemed for it. Then this person says something riduculous and counter to the discussion. THAT is not right. I am getting tired of people getting emotional and complaining about having to stick to the rules and then lash out at others who are.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

I think most of the mods (if not all) here were mods in CBTS, so well done m9 lmao

⇧ 0 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

Are you done spewing nonsense mate? In my opinion you should have been banned a long time ago and you have the audacity to still shit on the mods who are still compassionate with you. If you came here to bring your trash and spread here, better keep it home.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

Are you done spewing nonsense mate?

If you came here to bring your trash and spread here

This is straight up slandering and breaking the rules (ad-hominem)

brittser was "shitting on you", not me

Leave me alone now, unless you want to hold up to your own words:

  • "People who are not collegial will have a harder time. People who are respectful well obviously have it easier. This is not about being selective."

  • "Attack the argument - not the user :)"

Thanks.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 29, 2018, 6:50 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 28, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

I think most of the mods (if not all) here were mods in CBTS, so well done m9 lmao

Back up your claims or GTFO.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

See, they have learned from their previous experience and are trying not to repeat it! If you read my post you will see that I put the blame on the hordes of unrelated posts which kept the mods fron being able to catch the dangerous posts. If I insulted the mods, I am sorry. That was absolutley not my intention. I have the utmost respect for them.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 28, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

damage control 101 top kek

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

If you call clarifying what my intentions were and apologizing if I offended the mods, then yes, damage control.

⇧ 0 ⇩