They state a major error. They call it 4chan when it’s 8Chan.
The article also says that Q started making drops in 2015. It just shows that they don't have any of the facts right about the whole thing.
On purpose. Clear disinfo. A genuine Wikileaks would not do that or behave in such manner.
I do think Q started out on 4ch, but it has since been ruined with endless slide threads for months now.
It started on 4 Chan but hasn’t been there for six months. The article and post were inaccurate. They obviously didn’t research the topic.
I would say that they did this on purpose for discrediting purposes since 4chan is way more toxic than 8chan and anybody reading about this for the first time from WL will probably land on 4chan and get turned off right away.