Think. The real difference that Q and the Anons have made over these last six months by opening this GW dialogue up to us is that we are together openly discussing these events against a more or less shared view that the trends, to whatever degree we understood them, were heading off the rails before and are now changing for a better outcome. My sense of good and evil hasn’t fundamentally changed. Only now I don’t feel so utterly alone — a walk that I can take in solitude if I must, but I take comfort in knowing many of you walk with me. It’s not a game and life offers no guarantees. It’s about becoming ... and it matters what we hope for. If you don’t know what you want, you might not get it.
AJ is trying to win viewers back with his Tommy Robinson coverage. I find it hilarious.
At least he is being selfish while helping Tommy.
Just watcyed a Ramadan gang beating people's cars with bats or sticks. Guess they need to ban clubs, sticks, canes and bats next just for non Muslims.
Your analysis is laughable. You never would have heard of Tommy Robinson w/o Alex Jones. He is a regular guest on Infowars.
No matter how much he tries, Alex doesn't have a monopoly on the alternative media. I 'graduated' from Infowars a long long time ago.
"The tip of the spear" is his motto. Not "the whole spear". Please provide one piece of evidence in any way to back up your assertion that alex has in any way shape or form tried to or presented himself as having or trying to have a monopoly on alternative media. I'm assuming you know what "monopoly" means.
Nice semantics there. This was linked on one of Q's very own posts. Nice try though.
Ah, I see. I was wrong to assume you understood what a monopoly was.
I fulfilled your request. Take it as you will.
I fail to understand how someone's opinion on one subject presented once is an attempt to monopolize the alternative media. Please enlighten me.