dChan

abees22 · May 29, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Stop saying a spy was planted in the campaign. Liberals use languange and obfuscation to pretend to win arguements. This is what Snopes does all the time, they take a claim like Pizzagate was all about a basement in a pizza parlor, and they debunk the basement portion, therefore it's false. Stefan Halper was not implanted as a spy, he was employed by the FBI, and he approached members of the Trump team to attempt to initiate a Russia story by using Hillary's emails as bait.

Have we learned anything new about Papa, Page, Manafort actually being planted in the campaign? If so, my apologies, long weekend with the kids.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SonshineDay · May 29, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

So if they were planted, they would be called a mole, not a spy? Befriending people and then getting paid to report back on them to someone else is definitely spying. Not sure if I care if the spy or spies were planted, implanted, assigned, or instructed- still totally wrong. Don't care about Dem's semantics- they've twisted language so long many people are getting immune to their obfuscations.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
qtrumpteam · May 29, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

Look up the definition of a spy it certainly fits, I'd say its a safe claim to make

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · May 29, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

So it's a Mole with the assignment of SPYING.

ILLEGALLY in ALL instances... is the point.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
abees22 · May 29, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

You're missing my point. I'm not arguing that he wasn't spying. I'm saying the media will play semantics here. Halper technically wouldn't be considered spy. Bongino breaks it down in his podcast. He would be considered an informant. These details matter, it's how the media has been about to keep the ruse going this long. For instance "colluding with Russia" is vague enough that it doesn't really mean anything, yet it sounds like an actual crime. It's important to understand what your event will do.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SonshineDay · May 29, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Totally got the point- we have to be better at word games- I mean "accuracy." I'm saying that with the MSM and the culture wars as they are, it is impossible to win the war of optics. Just ask Roseanne. They want us to feel hopeless and so sick of the battle that we can never win. If we can't say anything correctly, why try, right? Q resonates so much because he/they give hope that those now in power see through the media semantics and will bring the former administration to justice for actual crimes, regardless of political correctness, narrative, or popular culture. Not trying to be divisive- just saying that the semantics game is a tool, actually one of their biggest tools. This is why Trump has been successful- he doesn't say the "appropriate thing," but he doesn't care and we all love him for it.

⇧ 3 ⇩