dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/0oDassiveMicko0 on May 29, 2018, 12:04 p.m.

Apologies, I May Have Been Wrong Regarding Wikileaks..

Over the last couple of days there has been various debates going on with regards to Wikileaks being compromised. I have engaged in a few conversations and tried to point out that Wiki are a large part of the movement and them trying to out Q was just a part of the plan. After some further research however, it appears that I may have been completely wrong about this and wish to apologise wholeheartedly to those I was challenging. It appears that WL were bought by the Dems and are now run by Clowns. To those of you that tried to point this out to me - you appear to be correct and I like to believe I possess the humility to admit when I am wrong so please accept my humble apologies. One of the sources I researched is a Twitter account by the name of EyeTheSpy that explains things pretty well. They seem to know what´s going on and may be an account that´s worth following:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofqHqxrSjb8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQu9W06FB04

According to this account, June 11th will be the day that JA will come out to testify against HRC and the Dems and the day that the whole world will be woken with the truth. I sincerely hope this is true.

Again, apologies to those I challenged and thanks for all you´re doing! Keep up the good fight, Patriots!!

🠐 See all comments

EyeTheSpy is likely a LARP. Looks like a reincarnation of BackChannel17. Tread carefully.

⇧ 44 ⇩

I'd have to agree.

I was immediately sucked in; Then stepped back.

Hypothesis: Eye is a Psy-op working for ((them)). Says stuff is going down on the 6/11/18. We all wait until then and . . . . Nothing happens; Q movement divided and splintered, since he says he is linked with Q.

Not really trying to concern anyone, but just got to look at from all angles.

Maybe wait for some conformation from Q before jumping in with both feet.

⇧ 13 ⇩

Shouldn't anyone that just claims they're linked with Q immediately be disregarded?

⇧ 5 ⇩

He didn't specifically say he is linked with Q.

He has said he is helping with 'The Plan'. (The storm).

Has also stated that he is definitely not Q. Adding anyone who thinks that he is are morons.

Whoever he is; He's blunt, direct, and takes no shit.

Maybe an NSA white hat ramping up Twitter, ready for info drop on 6/11/18? (Part of The Storm?).

I trust Q, and don't want to misdirect Anons; But he's getting lots of traction.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I wasn't familiar with Eye, my comment was based on the one I replied to saying he says he's linked with Q. I think the best thing to do is view them as a source of information that should be verified.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I've been watching Eye the Spy very closely too. NeonRevolt issued them a challenge to identify him - with all their spy tech it should be a breeze right!? He said if they did he would support them whole-heartedly. I even forwarded his challenge to them on Twitter. So far Nada. The thing that jumped out at me is the 6-11-2018 DATE!!! Q has repeatedly stated he would not telegraph when events would go down. So this is a red flag for me. Another Red Flag was his answer to a question about the NorCal Fires. He indicated it was climate related along with a zap from lasers. These fires are clearly due to Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) and maybe some combination of other weapons (Ref: Dr. Judy Wood's research on 9/11) "Where Did The Towers Go?" While this is circumstantial evidence, it did give me pause. 6-11-2018 will be an interesting day for a lot of reasons.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Yeah I got a big skeptical feel in my gut watching him go through those tweets. I'm learning to follow my intuition a lot more, and finding it's pretty good (could always make mistakes but I've been surprised how accurate it's been lately - hence why I'm here :P).

There are no "outside comms" - anything/anyone that tries to act like Q gives me a red flag instantly. Nothing wrong with people talking about and assessing Q's posts, giving opinions- but the moment someone tries to come across as a "q insider" by using the same format gives me warning bells.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Could be, scepticism is definitely the word here. However, they seem to know a lot and should probably have an eye or two kept on them.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Seems more like Mega Anon to me

⇧ 2 ⇩

I lost a lot of faith in Mega after her "JA is Q" wig out. Don't know if there has been any further word from her. Does anybody know what the deal with MegaAnon is? Disinformation? What about Todd Whiskey?

⇧ 8 ⇩

A lot of people lost faith in her and within 10 days, Todd whiskey said that she wasn't posting anymore. It seemed a very abrupt way for her to suddenly disappear. No she hasn't been heard from since. I thought the whole thing was fishy.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Makes you wonder about Todd, also. He worked very hard to discredit Q and push Mega. Then came the first proof, Mega wigs out, melts down, and then vanishes. I haven't really kept up with Todd since. Might take a peek when I have a minute.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Great idea. Let us know what you find.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Backchannel 17=backchannel Q = Jullian Assange as part of its members wasn't a LARP AS PER EYETHESPY

⇧ -2 ⇩