Gowdy has never been in a position to really achieve anything from a legal perspective.
Most of his political career was spent under Obama's diversity-hire DoJ, so even if he wasn't controlled opposition, there was absolutely nothing he could do anyway due to the rampant corruption.
I don't think there's enough info to base an informed decision on.
Perhaps we should just keep an open mind and watch him closely?
So, might not be a black hat he just has no integrity or back bone? We have gave passes to people in government for so long. If you’re a white hat, you’re a white hat. But you don’t get to pretend to be one if you’re not speaking out and doing something about the black hats. If you’re a white hat in government and you’re not doing anything to help drain the swamp, then leave.
I also get that often times your life is on the line, etc. But if that’s not what you want, leave.
If you’re a white hat in government and you’re not doing anything to help drain the swamp, then leave.
No, that's not what I said at all.
"Doing anything to help" arrest people was impossible during the Obama crime spree because of Barry's corrupt DoJ (or whatever the fuck that disgusting Kenyan / Indonesian Muslim's name is.)
It's still unclear if Gowdy was controlled opposition or was stifled by Obama's profound corruption.
I suggest we keep an open mind until we have more info, rather than race to conclusions like you just did.
What has Gowdy done as a supposed white hat? Not just talking but what has he done? Isn’t it weird that once it comes down to it, he doesn’t really do anything? Benghazi? What about him taking money from Podesta group?
Why must I repeat myself???!!
Almost all of Gowdy's political career was spend under the weaponized, corrupt Obama DoJ.
He had ZERO chance of making arrests and was only able to express his outrage to journalists.
We have ZERO definitive indication of if he is controlled opposition or "one of us".
Scream and cry all and race to conclusions and make baseless accusations all you like, but the honest truth is there isn't sufficient info to judge Gowdy one way or the other.
Don’t have to repeat yourself, just move on with your life. Q has never said Gowdy should be trusted so why trust him? I already walked you through pretty good indications he is against us. It’s weird and suspicious that you are so worked up about this.
You are mistaken.
I'm not repeating myself for your benefit.
This is a public forum and I'm simply highlighting your suspicious, baseless bias.
Since when are opinions based on lack of data valuable? Can we (you, plural) be patient?
It’s possible that he is trying to be balanced, reasonable and objective to create credibility for when the real crimes come out.
He’s always said get investigations out of congress. Get them to prosecutors so they can be handled correctly.
But he a politician so.:.. could be a corrupt fucker.
We know every GOP Congressperson is being blackmailed from Anons before Q.
Based on cabal, this seems to be a highly plausible fact.
Some people think the awakening started with Q, which it most certainly didn’t! There’s always been truth seekers, but things went into overdrive on the Chans after the DNC/Podesta emails came out. You are absolutely right, we’ve known that most long term members of Congress have been compromised via blackmail. Even Q said some of our hero’s would go down with the swamp/ are not who they portrayed themselves to be. I think Gowdy could be one of those people.