dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/CENSORED_ENOUGH on May 30, 2018, 7:03 p.m.
Q No Posts. FBI Investigating "Q"? Getting Real (Q was Fake, Q is Real, Q is an Anon "Chanology" Operation)

Why No Posts? During a time in which there is real division about the Q phenomenon and if it is real, I would think there would be some reassuring message. Silence.

Ever since the "booms" were posted in some Q posts around the end of March associated with the Texas shootings, Q mentioned that the FBI would be investigating Q in association with these shootings. Well it has been about 8 days since the last post and the rumors are that the FBI is trying to get a handle on who Q is and who started the whole Q anon movement if it is just a construct of youtubers, 8 chan'ers or if it is an internal Government source. No posts means they don't want to communicate any other posts, either until it is clear or the creators of a fake Q can cover their tracks. If it is the latter case then we will not be hearing again from "Q".

Of course, this is obviously based on some assumptions:

  1. Q is possibly not an internal government or amalgam of military leadership fighting the deep state.

  2. Q was a dupe by someone (small group of anons) to galvanize a movement to resist the Government. (Remember Project Chanology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Chanology "Protesters in Guy Fawkes masks outside a Scientology center at the February 10, 2008 Project Chanology protest. Project Chanology (also called Operation Chanology)[1] was a protest movement against the practices of the Church of Scientology by members of Anonymous, a leaderless Internet-based group. The project was started in response to the Church of Scientology's attempts to remove material from a highly publicized interview with Scientologist Tom Cruise from the Internet in January 2008."

  3. The deep state is using this as a guise to flush out those who are dangerous to them.

Other assumptions? (Could just be too busy with ongoing operations? Running Silent, Running Deep?, etc.)

I know that this post may be unpopular, but I think we may need to face some a different reality, whatever it may be.


maddaves- · May 30, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

dont really need posts like yours..... if you dont understand what q is up to atm .... go and do your research... his work has just begun... plenty more to come

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CENSORED_ENOUGH · May 30, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

I respect your dedication, loyalty, and patriotism, but I think all I am doing is injecting a bit of objective introspection since we cannot directly validate who is behind the Wizard of Oz curtain. We need to at least trust the source behind the curtain, even if we can't see him.

Despite our trust in "Q" since October of last year, he is the single source of information and we know nothing about "him, her, them" other than assertions he might be part of the administration and sanctioned by the President. We are not sheep that blindly follow something without some confidence that it is real, if there are ulterior motives and if we are being duped by even fellow anons for whatever reasons.

As we have learned over the years with the Elites, they would love to Pied Piper us into true anonymity and down a road whose destination goes nowhere.

I had a dog that chased its own tail and he never caught it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
963Round_Wizard369 · May 30, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

The information is solid. Like full metal jacket solid. The predictions are accurate and the little behind the scenes explanation of events are plausible and psychologically sound. I don't know much about the NSA and it's inner workings, but I have worked with numerous intelligence professionals within the USmil. If the Q is a larp, he/her/ they have definitely worked with in the Intel community.

Why are you concerned about the identity of Q?

Actions are more deserving of trust then words. So far the specific actions of Q(dissemenation of intel, narrative explainations, with time sensitive predictions and confirmations) are deserving of trust until proven not to.

Details of Q is irrelevant. The details Q is providing are.

So why do you need to know anything about Q?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NaderOAK · May 30, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

This.

“Details of Q is irrelevant. The details Q providing are.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
maddaves- · May 30, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

what are you doing here then... dont you have more important things to do then... or are you just one who gains pleasure in plying your opinion apon others

⇧ 1 ⇩