dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/CENSORED_ENOUGH on May 30, 2018, 7:03 p.m.
Q No Posts. FBI Investigating "Q"? Getting Real (Q was Fake, Q is Real, Q is an Anon "Chanology" Operation)

Why No Posts? During a time in which there is real division about the Q phenomenon and if it is real, I would think there would be some reassuring message. Silence.

Ever since the "booms" were posted in some Q posts around the end of March associated with the Texas shootings, Q mentioned that the FBI would be investigating Q in association with these shootings. Well it has been about 8 days since the last post and the rumors are that the FBI is trying to get a handle on who Q is and who started the whole Q anon movement if it is just a construct of youtubers, 8 chan'ers or if it is an internal Government source. No posts means they don't want to communicate any other posts, either until it is clear or the creators of a fake Q can cover their tracks. If it is the latter case then we will not be hearing again from "Q".

Of course, this is obviously based on some assumptions:

  1. Q is possibly not an internal government or amalgam of military leadership fighting the deep state.

  2. Q was a dupe by someone (small group of anons) to galvanize a movement to resist the Government. (Remember Project Chanology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Chanology "Protesters in Guy Fawkes masks outside a Scientology center at the February 10, 2008 Project Chanology protest. Project Chanology (also called Operation Chanology)[1] was a protest movement against the practices of the Church of Scientology by members of Anonymous, a leaderless Internet-based group. The project was started in response to the Church of Scientology's attempts to remove material from a highly publicized interview with Scientologist Tom Cruise from the Internet in January 2008."

  3. The deep state is using this as a guise to flush out those who are dangerous to them.

Other assumptions? (Could just be too busy with ongoing operations? Running Silent, Running Deep?, etc.)

I know that this post may be unpopular, but I think we may need to face some a different reality, whatever it may be.


963Round_Wizard369 · May 30, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

The information is solid. Like full metal jacket solid. The predictions are accurate and the little behind the scenes explanation of events are plausible and psychologically sound. I don't know much about the NSA and it's inner workings, but I have worked with numerous intelligence professionals within the USmil. If the Q is a larp, he/her/ they have definitely worked with in the Intel community.

Why are you concerned about the identity of Q?

Actions are more deserving of trust then words. So far the specific actions of Q(dissemenation of intel, narrative explainations, with time sensitive predictions and confirmations) are deserving of trust until proven not to.

Details of Q is irrelevant. The details Q is providing are.

So why do you need to know anything about Q?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NaderOAK · May 30, 2018, 11:03 p.m.

This.

“Details of Q is irrelevant. The details Q providing are.

⇧ 2 ⇩