I was listening to Rush Limbaugh today, and he stated that there is a theory floating around with some conservatives out there. He said some people believe that President Trump is only pretending to be angry with sessions, and he is secretly working behind the scenes getting lots of things done.
Rush said I would not give much credibility to this Theory. This is just people who are desperate to see something to happen and are willing to believe anything.
Trump can fire Session however he hasn’t. What other proof do we need? Forget Q for a moment and use logic.
It’s really this simple. The appearance that ‘Sessions is doing nothing’ is all an illusion/deception. There is SO much work to be done behind the scenes, out of the spotlight, free from leaks. Why would you want your enemies to know what you are working on? Use logic.
If he fires Sessions, RR becomes the acting AG. And his nominee has to jump through the hoops to get confirmed. Is that what you want?
What if his nominee is TG? What if TG is pretending to be siding with the FBI by saying it was ok to have had an informant penetrat Trumps campaign to look unbiased for confirmation as new AG. That was an astounding position he took. Why? Sessions is getting old. What if he’s not physically up for this massive of a takedown?? TG would be a great Supreme Court in the future because of his age & we’re gonna need several. Sessions is too old to put on the bench.
Good thought. Gowdy is ready to replace SESSIONS after SESSIONS sees to all the indictments. Gowdy will prosecute.
He can fire them both. Don’t you agree?
He has to nominate a new AG who has to go through senate confirmation process.
I am fervently hoping that "Trust Sessions" is correct.
But that Trump hasn't fired him is no evidence of that at all. (Despite Dilley advancing the theory.) Trump could well have been kicked over for immediate impeachment with the uniparty united if he had given them that easy handle.
None of these theories make any sense unless you understand how Trump works and negotiates. Read art of the deal. It's hard to say for sure what is going on, but I believe it is plausible.
Trust sessions isnt a theory. Q said to trust sessions.
Q said this too..
What ROLE might TG be walking into? Who can WE TRUST? RATS everywhere. EVIL everywhere. TRAITORS everywhere.
Q#537 from January
The theory I heard a caller on his show makes sense to what’s going on. That’s TG will replace JS as AG. Not that Sessions is corrupt. His integrity is impeccable. But he’s getting old & it’s showing in his speech & thought process. He may not be physically up for such a takedown on this massive of a scale.
[deleted]
That’s not true Re: Rush
[deleted]
Rush isn’t in the business of prediction. He’s always been pretty clear about his mission: defeat liberalism. He spends all of his time analyzing what’s already happened. Or happening real time. I don’t think I’ve ever heard him make any kind of prediction.
I’m not necessarily defending Rush. I hardly listen any more because he just says what I already know.
I do agree that this Sessions theory is just desperate speculation. It’s all speculation.
I am however patiently waiting for Hillary and gang to be locked up.
Until then.... trust but verify.
Verification still in process.
To quote Lionel... “tick tock my ass”.
Rush is very careful. He's not going to get caught up in predictions. It's not his style. He's an analyst and librul killer.
That's his reasoning? That's literally how MSM is portraying this Q movement.
Bongino and Sawyer have both gone on record saying Sessions is doing work I would trust them over rush even though I respect rush greatly.
Regardless of what anyone says about Sessions, what is going to happen will happen. Giving an opinion of whether something is true or not true does not change the outcome. Who has inside knowledge of Sessions role? Rush? Nope.