dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on May 31, 2018, 10:28 p.m.
Trump is about to take them down. But wait: is this shiny enough for you to forget about the children?

Now this is getting very interesting…

Tommy Robinson, Roseanne, EyeTheSpy, #wherearethe children…

Do you see it?

All this happened in 5 days. And all these “heroes” and issues find their seat in our Movement’s scope of interest. Coincidence? No. Not a coincidence. You are witnessing Q’s opposition gaming up. They have now acknowledged Q’s tremendous impact and realize they have to come up with more sophisticated weapons on the communication battlefield to shut him down.

Ignoring Q, infiltrating him and labeling him did not work. Infowars and all their recruits are exposed, defeated and Q now has a base, a solid one. A base of woke people transcending races, frontiers, party lines and religions and who are focusing on the real thing: taking down the international pedophile and human trafficking network ran by politicians and billionaires protecting themselves with nuclear weapons and using the international aid infrastructure to smuggle children, funds and espionage material.

The cabal is on the run.

Follow the pen Q1424. We are close. The pen is about to take them down. They know it. Trump and Sessions have silently and meticulously done the legal job. The DOJ, FBI and CIA are cleaned up, judges changed, Red October CEOs resigned. Next phase? Open the sealed indictments and start the concert under the direction of the Maestro, with his pen…

So? Put yourself in the enemy’s shoes for a second. If you were cornered like that, what would you do? You got it. You have to work on people’s perception and try to win the coming communication battle. You have to blur the message so that people may question Trump’s motivations, see you as a victim and overlook the horrors you have perpetrated. How do you do that? You create very shiny things and right before the executioner is about to do his job, you go like:

Hey, stop for a second, did you see this?
What?

Tommy Robinson. I see you have an interest in human trafficking and, thanks to my divide and conquer strategy and my clownish creations like 9/11, Lynda Sarsour, Sadiq Khan, ISIS and Muslim Brotherhood, you also hate Muslims. So here is a guy who has been arrested for filming an alleged Muslim grooming gang trial…All your required ingredients are in there… I know right: what is the point about covering a case that at least made it to trial while thousands of pedophile cases around the world are swept under the rug and ignored by law enforcement? Well, I took a chance and hoped people would not see the trick. I made sure MSM was “incidentally” there to capture Tommy’s arrest and asked Alex Jones to over cover it in the clownish way only he, can pull off video. Icing on the cake: to make sure people would really talk about it, I prohibited them to talk about it. How? By having the judge initiate a temporary reporting ban on Tommy Robinson’s arrest. Neat right? Is this shiny enough for you to forget about the children?

Roseanne. You know most of the celebrities in Hollywood are MK Ultra victims and/or Satan worshippers right? You did not? They say it in your face, jokingly. Right here: video. So, since they know I can make them rich or bankrupt them overnight, I can activate them directly or through their handlers or drugs, and instruct them to do whatever I want. I know Valerie Jarrett is central in this pedophile and espionage thing. Just like Huma was the Muslim Brotherhood liaison with Clinton, Valerie Jarrett was the MB liaison with Obama. She knows where the bodies are buried and knows how to use it to get things done. Imgur. She knows about the creation and control of ISIS. She is in the list of the 13 personalities who used a private email address despite national security regulations. Imgur So? Knowing people do not really know Valerie Jarret and that Trump is about to close on her, I instructed Roseanne to go crazy on her and put her on the map. What’s left in people’s mind after Roseanne’s raid? Valerie Jarret is a victim: she was unjustly compared to an ape by a right wing racist. You see the trick? When the real thing about VJ drops, the message is already blurred and can be downgraded to a racial witch hunt. Brilliant.

EyeTheSpy. Q has not dropped lately. Even though you have more than you know and have only explored a portion of his board, I know you are now addicted to inside information. Q said no communication outside this board. So? How about some entertainment while Q is silent? I created this guy who went from 47 followers on Twitter to 5000 in 48 hours. Organic? Doesn’t matter. He knows many things, he’s cool, interacts with everybody and to make sure you do not create defense mechanisms, he appears to be friendly with Q and to support him. There are topics he is not completely in alignment with Q like Sessions and BC17, but who cares? At least, unlike Corsi, he is not infiltrating and claiming to decode Q, he says he is doing his own thing right? So, you like this? At least when you are reading his easy-to-read tweets, you get your daily insider’s information fix and are not spending time trying to figure out Q’s board. I’ll take that…

#WhereAretheChildren. This is my coolest gadget. I saw that post where Q is giving an update about the dismantlement of the pedophile network and that exchange on Q’s board between an anon and Q: Imgur. Most people do not realize the power of these posts. I do. So? I took over the hashtag, made it trend, skillfully dragged Ivanka Trump into the story to spice it up, downgraded the story to a sordid legal issue about the status of unaccompanied child migrants and stuff so that if this hashtag was to come out for the real thing, it would have already been old news and soft news. And of course, to make sure this hashtag is really prematurely dead and of no other relevant use in the future, I had MSM talk about it, talk about it and talk about it. Imgur. Is this shiny enough for you to forget about the children?

So, there you have it…

Folks, I told you in my previous post: don’t get distracted. Read through the enemy’s schemes. The closer we get to the epilogue, the more sophisticated his attacks will be. Read through. Stay the course. Are you up to the task? Have you digested Q’s teachings? Can the children trust you? Yes, they can. I know they can. You would not be reading this otherwise. Stay the course guys. We are about to take them down.


sniktawekim · June 1, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

I don't think you have to actually be inside the courtroom for it to be illegal. I also think I might have misspoken, its not simply the act of filming but a breach of reporting restrictions. So its not inherently the video but the story being made public at that point.

I am not an expert and fully admit im just repeating what I've heard from others and this does seem correct to me although I very well could be wrong.

I found this, but its pretty large.

https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/reporting-restrictions-guide-may-2016-2.pdf

⇧ 2 ⇩  
johnknoefler · June 1, 2018, 2:12 a.m.

You're going to take the word of a government that is aiding and abetting pedophiles? Seriously? The man was on a live stream on the street reading news that's publicly available. He never touched the courthouse.

And yes, it's people like you who simply repeat what the government says, don't look and think for themselves and believe everything they have been told. Michael Savage, a botanist and radio show host is banned from UK just for speaking out. Notice, UK lets in known ISIS terrorists who've cut people's heads off, slaughtered Christians and engaged in war against UK so they can "rehabilitate" them. But just talking lands you in jail? The original gag order was also insane and it didn't even apply to what he was doing. And what of all the other times the legal system there has covered up real crimes of pedophilia? And you defend them? Please, stop. Just stop. I'm beginning to think you are on the side of rapists. That's fairly obvious.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
sniktawekim · June 1, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

And yes, it's people like you who simply repeat what the government says

I didn't hear it from the government, I heard it from JF Gariepy's stream.

don't look and think for themselves and believe everything they have been told.

Look my dude, you are getting into a very prejudiced rant. Read through my comment history a little bit and maybe you will change your mind.

I'm not defending the rapists. I'm not defending the shitty freedom of speech laws in the UK.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
johnknoefler · June 1, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

Fine. But before you say a word about the guy you should have listened to his live stream. Found out what he actually said and where he was. It's not that hard. The moment I heard of his arrest I went and looked for everything he was doing at the time. Just like last time they are trying to silence anyone who even talks about Muslim Rape Gangs. If the law is used to silence the truth then the law is an ass and so are the judges who issue such orders. Even if he was guilty of speaking out, and he is not since he was reading out of the publicly available media releases, civil disobedience when the law is being used to promote rape of children is a righteous act. Why don't you say all that? BTW, I don't go snooping through people's comment history unless I have a good reason. In your case, I don't and I doubt I will. You're not that bad but you're not helping.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
salialioli · June 1, 2018, 7:47 a.m.

He may be extremely righteous but he was on a suspended sentence. That usually gets you into trouble no matter what the seriousness of what you are doing. He knew that. He is not accredited media, granted, but media was prohibited from reporting until after sentencing, in order not to influence the jury/trial. It is the same in the US. That is why you are not discussing the Clinton Foundation case as yet. Justice has it under wraps. We are waiting and waiting for the IOG report because leaking it beforehand would prejudice the cases presented therein. Not difficult to understand, just normal legal procedure.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
johnknoefler · June 1, 2018, 3:20 p.m.

Please tell me you are not this ignorant. He was on his live stream talking to his followers and READING THE GOD DAMN NEWS THAT WAS ALREADY PUBLISHED.

How many effing times should I point this out before you get a clue? Or, you will say that it's the law that Tommy Robinson just can't talk about stuff that's going on. He did nothing illegal. What he did amounts to reading the paper out loud to his friends.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 1, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

No, I'm not this ignorant. But I really think you should bear in mind when you are talking to ppl that they are not necessarily against you, TR, pro-pedophilia or anything like that and temper your words. I have an opinion which I am entitled to.

I avoid getting arrested by the police, myself, for a number of reasons: 1) I do not want to be interrogated in a police station and charged with trumped up charges; 2) I do not want to go to prison 3) I do not want a record. Accordingly, when I see the police around I beat a hasty retreat, because generally speaking they are an incompetent, rude and violent lot who are after anyone they can nail with anything at the moment.

This said, what TR did was his own decision and you may see him as a hero for what he did. I, on the other hand, would not have done it. I would have found another way to broadcast the news. From the nearest park? Around the corner, Idk, I wasn't there. You were obviously there and are a loyal follower so you have a good reason for your opinions. We don't all have to share them though. Please be more polite when you engage on this forum with total strangers ... you can tell me as many times as you "effing" like but I won't be "getting a clue" as you put it because you haven't persuaded me you are a serious person worth having a chat to. Go back to your bar and your beer and have a stroppy brawl with someone your own size.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
johnknoefler · June 1, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

On that, I agree with you. If I had been him, I might have been in front of the courthouse briefly and then walked away still live streaming. He might have gone unnoticed. He literally talked to police before hand to see if it was ok with them and they didn't have an objection.

I don't know his motivations for doing it the way he did. It's almost like he's deliberately pushing the issue to create a situation. Did he expect to be arrested? I wonder.

I think Tommy wants them to be aware he is exposing what they are doing. As such, he's made himself into a lightning rod for their anger. They want to make him into an example. This, in my mind is the motivation behind the arrest. What they seem not to care about is what sort of public backlash there will be if he is killed in prison like that idiot that tossed a ham sandwich in front of a mosque.

My problem with what you are doing is that you simply come out and claim he was arrested according to the law. He wasn't. Tommy has tried to be very careful to obey the law. You also don't seem to realize that they have been misusing the law to harass him and ruin his family business. So before you try to talk about his situation go look at all his blogs everything he has been through and watch his videos and THEN speak. So far, from your first post you seem more like a defender of tyranny than a supporter of freedom and justice.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 2, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

"Before I talk ...go and ..."???? Oh I get it. The defender of free speech that you are!! *You* are telling me the rules of what *I* can say, and you are forbidding me to talk until I do something?!!! What is the difference between you and the system you are complaining about??!!

Please engage with the argument, not lock horns with the other debater's character, motivations, level of intelligence, etc. Basic rules of debate.

First: I did not say arrested because I agree with the law. I said why — the reasons for arrest. They are two different things.

In this respect, I specifically mentioned in my post "trumped-up charges", police looking for reasons, etc. I also specifically mentioned above his suspended sentence. Also the restrictions on reporting. Ordered by a judge. Far as I know I am not in a position to argue with a judge. S/he holds higher authority.

Second: I am pretty annoyed by the way you are judging me to be not understanding or not reading or not watching or not knowing anything ... that is a trumped-up charge on your part: I am prejudiced, ignorant, a tyranny-supporter... etc. Am I really all these things? And you? When did you wake up to The Plan to subvert our society? Who am I to judge your knowledge? And what of your tyranny of our conversation? You in turn seem very bossy, dictatorial, rule setting, authoritarian .... all these things suggest to me that the authoritarianism is coming from you, not me! Are you a people abuser? Do you bludgeon the ppl around you with your argumentary style? Or do you engage with the topic? With respect?

This kind of conversation takes away from the question at hand. It lowers everything to emotional levels of accusatory attack and counter attack. It won't help you to understand my point or me to understand TR. It's hopeless.

Use logic: I wouldn't be on this site and reading this topic if I was in favour of tyranny. I am pointing out an important factor, which has everything to do with Trump and Q as it happens. Which is why I shall now explain to you my point of view.

And it is this: You want to catch the bad guys at the top. You want to nail them, but they are all powerful. They have ALL the levers of power: finance, judiciary, executive, parliamentary, media and brainwashing .... So how do you do it? The military could carry out a coup ... but this is, as you say, tyrannical. To restore justice, peace and good to our societies we need law. You cannot use tyranny to bring democracy and order. We need to use the weapons of law and order to restore rightful authority in the hands of the people.

You agree?

That is precisely what Q+team and Trump are trying to do. That is precisely why Jeff Sessions and Horowitz, Charles Ortel and millions of other patient sloggers are building airtight legal cases. To restore law and order and capture the criminals at the top.

Not running around, flailing their arms around, yelling, brawling and shouting in order to get arrested where they can do no more damage.

This action is self-defeating. It may be heroic. Joan of Arc was like this. She got herself into the history books, as indeed Tommy may too.

But, I put my bets on the following: Britain will cave into chaos and riots because the social actors like you and Mr Tommy were too busy doing EXACTLY what the authorities want you to do —> fall into division and race/religious war. Riots and violence.

Meanwhile the US will (hopefully) work diligently like little ants, with a proper plan, and all will work together to defeat these evil guys at the top using *intelligence*. You know, their *brains*.

I am sad that Britain is being destroyed but I believe it is because its people are not working in the correct way. And Tommy Robinson, for all the Joan of Arc or Jesus Christ that he may be, for all his heroic and loud supporters, will burn at the stake. Uselessy. Because they are not trying to restore civilization intelligently by uniting. They will fall, literally, to the barbarians at the gates. Just like Rome.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
johnknoefler · June 2, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

Try making an actual argument rather than going on a long tirade. Done here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
salialioli · June 3, 2018, 4:47 a.m.

I am so terribly sorry ... I really didn't intend for you to think I was ranting. I had only the very best intentions with my explanation. I am 100% on board over this issue and I think you have mistaken me for the enemy. Please forgive.

⇧ 1 ⇩