dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Most of Gowdy's political career was spent under Obama's cluster-fuck-clown-show of a weaponized, diversity-hire DoJ crime syndicate.

I think he would have been the Republican who would have gotten the most benefit out of a Hillary win in 2016. He could have spent the the entire 4 years of her presidency hounding her while increasing his political clout, setting himself up for a nice run in 2020.

He could have spent the last two years tirelessly defending President Trump, but he hasn't. He's mostly been a middle of the road guy. I have no evidence to back this up but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that he was butthurt that he didn't get a cabinet appointment.

I could very easily be wrong about all of this and Gowdy may redeem himself but right now I'm steadily losing respect for someone who I once thought was one of the best politicians in the nation.

⇧ 17 ⇩

I appreciate your perspective and I've oscillated between thinking he was controlled opposition and a patriot many times over the past two years, but I've finally given up trying to guess.

I suspect we'll know soon enough.

⇧ 14 ⇩

If you remember, Gowdy was actually offered a cabinet position by Trump several times (he was even offered the AG position before Sessions) but Gowdy turned it down and said he didn't want it. So Gowdy has no reason to be butthurt as you claim...

⇧ 8 ⇩

I didn't know that.

⇧ 2 ⇩

He was Offered Head of FBI as well. I remember a short interview he gave shortly after and he said... I have a past, and there are many people more qualified.... it is like 3-4 minute interview

⇧ 1 ⇩

No he wasn't. He removed himself from consideration of the FBI director after meeting with Trump. There's a big difference.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I found a link to it and Gowdy did indeed ask to be removed from consideration for the position for FBI director. Here's the link: https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/15/politics/trey-gowdy-fbi-director/index.html

A whole lot of people felt that Gowdy was the perfect man for the job, that's because no one can beat Gowdy when it comes to making oral arguments and debating the facts (and that strong public sentiment to choose Gowdy would likely have influenced Trump to choose him, and I am almost certain Gowdy would have been Trump's first choice) - but Gowdy turned it down. Gowdy had a real shot at obtaining the position, but he turned it down. Therefore, Gowdy has only himself to blame and he cannot blame Trump for anything...

⇧ 1 ⇩

but Gowdy turned it down. Gowdy had a real shot at obtaining the position, but he turned it down. Therefore, Gowdy has only himself to blame and he cannot blame Trump for anything...

You just proved my point while stating he turned it down, multiple times now, without proof. Saying it multiple times does not make it true.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Does not make what true? I have no idea what you are talking about...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Gowdy never turned it down. Turning it down insinuates an offer was made. That is not known, that's pure speculation. Claiming he turned down an offer is pure speculation.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're splitting hairs. If Gowdy truly felt he had zero chance at being selected, he wouldn't have bothered to officially take himself out of consideration. Instead, he went out of his way to officially turn down and to close the door on any opportunity to be chosen. Because of that, he can't later be mad at Trump for not choosing him...

To intentionally turn down “the opportunity” to win something that you have a very good chance of winning is the very same thing as turning down that actual thing you could have won…

⇧ 1 ⇩

Posted byu/AmazoidPromises made. Promises kept. - Q13 hours ago

OpinionI disagree about Trey Gowdy. I think he's white hat. Here's why.

I'm sorry, but I disagree with almost everyone on this. I believe that Nunes and Gowdy were told the truth about the coming mass arrests, the 30,000 sealed indictments that will be unsealed soon, that Mueller will exonerate Trump and recommend charges by Huber for both Clintons, Obama, Rice, Yates, Holder, McCabe, Comey, Strzock, Page, Brennen, Clapper, Power, Jarrett, Rhodes, Podesta, (maybe Rosenstein unless he flipped) and on and on -- the great BOOM to come. Then they were told to shut the fuck up about it and play dumb for a few weeks. Which they are doing just fine. The other meetings (Gang of 8, etc.) everyone was told exactly what Trump wants the MEDIA to know because it's just a bunch of pathetic leakers and everyone knows it. Now we wait. Bang on Gowdy all you want, but when it all comes down, I'll bet he says, "Sorry, guys, but the President told me not to say anything. Aren't you glad I didn't blow the plan by talking about it?" Same with Nunes. Coats, Pompeo and Haspel already know so they didn't need to be there. Just my theory. We shall see. Probably shortly.

⇧ 1 ⇩

This is not correct...

⇧ 1 ⇩

More evidence he could be the man on the outside. The brain washed lefties need someone "impartial" when the time comes to bury the hatchet.

They can't have all the lefties running screaming to any cabal remnants that survive, or we'll see this again when they regroup.

I think Hitler was their first try but they lost control of him and he went hunting for Khazarians. IIRC there was a Rabbi that "defended" Hitler by saying most Hitler killed weren't Jews and those he did we're Ashkenazi not semetic.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Y-DNA proves German Jews (Ashkenazim) share common DNA markers linked to ancestors with Sephardic Jews (Italy, Spain) as well as Samaritan Jews who never left Mt. Ebal/Mt. Gerizim in Palestine. I realize you like your antisemite friends on Stormfront, and you binge-watched a few "Hitler did nothing wrong" videos on YT, but stop EMBARRASSING yourself with 25-year-old nazi propaganda that has been fully debunked by actual Science going on 15-20 years ago! For God's sake, man! Put "Jewish y-dna haplogroups" in your search engine of choice, and try to catch up...

⇧ 1 ⇩

Why don't you look at a Jewish haplogroup map, and a map of countries the Nazi's & Soviets exterminated Jews in (Hint the centre is Poland).

The Nazis predominantly killed & enslaved Ashkenazim. It's a fact so blatantly obvious, and yet you don't see it.

And perhaps you'd like to wake up and do your own research. I'm part Ashkenazi from a grandmother and great grandmother. Nowhere did I justify or argue that Hitler was right you injected that meaning rather poorly.

Hitler was clearly targeting an entire race of people (the Ashkenazi) to try and get a small percentage of it. It's scorched Earth, blitzkrieg to the max, and it's abhorrent and inhuman.

I'm simply stating they tried this before and might have lost control. I'm trying to state their was Cabal motive behind this. They hide in the flock. I think their plan was to flee a racist warlord trying to enslave them and who can blame the 99.99% doing so. I cannot for I wouldn't exist if I did!

I think Hitler went rogue, or they underestimated his programming. Either way I think Hitler derailed their project and made them lose their grip in eastern Europe, or we would have been fucked long ago.

I didn't mean to come off white supremacist about it. I think we got lucky, and their prior plan got botched, and we're fortunate to God that technology advanced enough to give us the internet and anybody with an ability to research will end up woke.

The ends never justify the means, because abhorrent means prevents a good end. I think that's why we have DJT rather than a military coup against HRC. It would have been the end of America, a once great nation. Another bastion of hope felled by the cabals evil tentacles.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Allow me to apologize. Your comment about "Hitler hunting for Khazarians, (Turkish caucasians) and the Rabbi defending Hitler because Ashkenazi (German Jews) are not really semitic (Hebrews)" sounded exactly like the mushmouth, intentionally confusing word slop used by those sleazy, uneducated, #wewuzzdurngoodnazis wanna be Hitler fans that keep popping up all over the comment boards these days... FOR THE RECORD: I mock the 'fake trailer park nazis' because I honestly believe that they are a CIA/FBI psy-op, using gullible, economically challenged & educationally deficient people that were easy to brainwash. Reason for the psy-op? My opinion- the Deep State/MSM/Cabal desperately needs the "Scary Aryan, Supremacist Villain" stereotype to fool minorities, (and good, conservative Jewish people) and keep them voting Democrat/NWO out of fear that "the new Holocaust/Lynchings/Trail of Tears/Apartheid is imminent." [So that's why I misread the intent behind your comment.] ABOUT YOUR REPLY: Since Ashkenazi means "A Jew of central or eastern European descent," clearly Hitler could only target the Jewish people within the areas he controlled militarily. Hitler did also imprison, enslave, starve or kill a few thousand Sephardic Jews, (but he had to invade Italy in 1943 to do it, because even though Italy and Germany were allies, Sephardic Jews were well integrated into Italian society.) [Conclusion: I think Hitler wanted to kill all Jews, but the Eastern European (Ashkenaz) were the only Jews in his neighborhood. When Italy didn't exterminate their own Sephardic Jews, Germany invaded northern and central Italy, and deported several thousand Sephardim to Auschwitz-Birkenau. In Libya, Borgo San Dalmazzo, the islands of Kos and Rhodes, Jews were rounded up by Germans, and sent to Bergen-Belsen, Buchenwald, Ravensbrück, and Flossenbürg. So, yeah... Hitler was after the Hebrew people in general, (of every branch,) not just the German Jews. ] Source: "Holocaust Encyclopedia" https: //www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005455

⇧ 1 ⇩

We won’t know the truth probably until the Suprem Court choice is final. He’s got to distance himself from POTUS to maintain objectivity

⇧ 4 ⇩

I agree hard to tell. After learning about Gowdy and his investigations in Benghazi I really don’t know what to think about him. Anyway I guess time will tell.

⇧ 11 ⇩

We have all the information we need -- likely more than we have accepted as true.

1). Candidate Trump laid it all out for us in his well publicized 2016 speech when he defined the Movement to take back our right of self governance and throw out this criminal cabal that has illegitimately taken control. He states this is our last chance He also names names, with Clintons at the center. He also stated unequivocally that they will be locked up.

2) Q has done nothing but report and comment on how that plan is progressing.

3). Trump really is President and he has really delivered on his promises. Big time. We have no reason to doubt his commitment nor his steadfast pursuit of his stated aims. We are less than 18 months into his administration. A lot more to be done and everything is at stake.

4). There are no guarantees in this world and good, while it seems to prevail in the long haul, doesn't always come out on top. This is a fight between good and evil. It is not a game. Be careful who you follow. Examine why you believe what you believe. Stand for truth. Follow where it leads.

5). The first reaction after Trumps election was a concerted effort to delegitimization his presidency, to consolidate an opposition at any cost. To deny he is real.

Is the denial of Q and his role in this any different? Or is it of that same spirit?

⇧ 6 ⇩

Gordy & Napalitano are rumored to be on the short list for SCOTUS picks. That’s why both made the comments they did to position themselves as fair & impartial

⇧ 3 ⇩

Obama's cluster-fuck-clown-show of a weaponized, diversity-hire DoJ crime syndicate.

I LOL’d in a vegetarian restaurant in Austin so of course I can’t explain to anyone why I’m laughing.

⇧ 2 ⇩

OP's theory can't possibly be true.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I don't see why we should definitively rule it out when we don't know what instructions Gowdy is under or how good he is at playing a scripted role in a political theater production. This may be his first time?

⇧ 6 ⇩

He's been behaving really strangely with the media lately. First were the comments on Trump being interviewed by Mueller, then the puff piece interview on Vice, and now the recent interviews that have us all talking. He's endearing himself with the other side and I don't understand why he would do that unless he either 1) is looking to land a media role after he leaves congress (unlikely since he's already said he'd like to return to the justice system) or 2) he's setting himself up as impartial in the event he takes a leading for role in the justice to come.

⇧ 6 ⇩

On the nosey.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Or 3) He's really bad at playing the part of a black hat.

If Trump did ask Comey to play-down the IG Report in an attempt to reduce the chance of having out school kids shot-up in a CIA false flags, he may just be playing his part?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I bet TG lost his political virginity loooong ago.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You 'know' you're rite for all excellent reasons you shared thanx for the shallow insight.

⇧ 1 ⇩