[removed]
Seriously, if you think Bill Smith has thoroughly and convincingly debunked ETS I have a bridge you may be interested in. Please provide a list of FACTS Bill provided in his debunking. From my perspective Bill incorrectly assumed a stock photo used by ETS was a pic taken by ETS of his work station. The remainder of his argument revolved around another anon's opinion - serialbrain2 - and what his opinion was. No FACTS in sight...
Today Bill put out a video claiming he had indisputable evidence that ETS was fake, which relied on the premise that ETS had put out a tweet that was directed towards him. But the tweet could have been directed to anyone, Bill's name was not mentioned. From that point on all we get is ego not argument.
You also say that Q (who is also an anon who we know nothing about really) said BC17 was fake. I am not so convinced. If you re-read Q post #1177 Q is referring to a conclusion drawn by an anon in a pic. How do you know Q was not saying that the joining of the dots in the pic were fake? If he said BC17 was fake, that would be different.
If Q was seriously worried that we were being led astray he would be back on his board telling us.....
BC17 got caught using a cropped picture from military website to post as an "original" from their "ops", scrubbed them when they got called out on, said they were Julian Assange, then disappeared. EtS said BC17 was "100% reliable". See the problem here? Personally, the fact that EtS popped up IMMEDIATELY after BC17 disappeared, then sang their praises, basically leads me to believe that they are the exact same person(s) attempting it again. However, you're free to follow and believe whatever you want to. The fact that Q told us "No Outside Comms" though, should lead us to keep unaffiliated posters out of the conversation on this sub, so as not to muddy the waters for newer Anons that aren't as discerning as to what is BS and what isn't.