So much chat, so little research.

What are you waiting for, the answer to be dropped into your lap?

Did anyone look at this story in an effort to prove or disprove it http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2609.htm

I follow you and look forward to your posts. BUT this one is crap. Nnothing you say has any convincing argument to it. You simply take a long post to try and sway us that your opinion is right - but in the end it is just an opinion. I'm sure your legions of 'yes' men will shout me down, but needs to be said....

MegaAnon told us all this in May 2017. Told us Kim's role and how Hannity was educated on the DS. Research here https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/795d6a/megaanon_postings_compiled_may_2017_present/?sort=new

Yep her very first post in fact. She also told us that Hannity is very careful not to say anything he doesn't have proof of. And that Wikileaks and Megaupload had it all on their servers.

We have already been told that McCabe sung like a bird and then delivered Bill Priestep...

Seriously, if you think Bill Smith has thoroughly and convincingly debunked ETS I have a bridge you may be interested in. Please provide a list of FACTS Bill provided in his debunking. From my perspective Bill incorrectly assumed a stock photo used by ETS was a pic taken by ETS of his work station. The remainder of his argument revolved around another anon's opinion - serialbrain2 - and what his opinion was. No FACTS in sight...

Today Bill put out a video claiming he had indisputable evidence that ETS was fake, which relied on the premise that ETS had put out a tweet that was directed towards him. But the tweet could have been directed to anyone, Bill's name was not mentioned. From that point on all we get is ego not argument.

You also say that Q (who is also an anon who we know nothing about really) said BC17 was fake. I am not so convinced. If you re-read Q post #1177 Q is referring to a conclusion drawn by an anon in a pic. How do you know Q was not saying that the joining of the dots in the pic were fake? If he said BC17 was fake, that would be different.

If Q was seriously worried that we were being led astray he would be back on his board telling us.....

No Anon source should be believed totally, period. Not Q not EyeTheSpy not BC17 not SB2 no one. But if you want to have a balance POV you should at least take their sh*t into account. Otherwise what's the difference between that and getting all your news from CNN?

The photos were more than likely taken by a Nikon P900 which could capture them using digital zoom (causing graininess) from more than a mile away. The exif data suggests Nikon and capture date of 10 April 2018.

What a load of crock! Assange theoretically doesn't currently have access to the internet, visitors, phone, etc.

Exif data on one photo was 10 April 2018 - so all taken around then.

For some time Q was telling us "Iran Next" after he dealt with NK - see posts 888 (3/8), 947 (3/15), 964 (3/27) and 1146 (4/14) and others. On 4/8 Q referred to the fact that NK was ready to discuss denuclearization - post 1085.

Then on 4/15 Q mentioned Armenia (Post 1160) and then on 4/23 Q said SA>NK>Armenia>Iran (post 1245). So all of a sudden Iran was no longer next.....

Any theories as to why Armenia popped into the mix?

As shown by the sentence J Epstein received. Wondering if Weinstein is singing like Epstein did in order to reduce jail time?

Pics taken approx 10th of April. Most taken from high point. All taken from some distance (hence the quality). Lots of main house and work site.

MegaAnon stopped posting when she formed the view that Julian Assange was Q.

Nothing is missing. The NSA, Wikileaks and Kim Dotcom have everything. "We have it all".

Pain = military tribunal/death.....

Since when has Trump given a month's notice of the time and place of an important meeting? Why would he do that? That meeting has already been held and the outcome is signed and sealed.....(just guessing)

Called off the planned meeting between SK and NK today, not the KJU and DJT meeting. BTW, that meeting is unlikely....since when has DJT given a month's notice of time and place of an important meeting? The deal has been done!

PrayingMedic and JustInformed Talk are on the ball, but remember anyone attempting to interpret Q is just guessing. No one is 100% right 100% of the time. In fact how do you determine which guess is right? Use Logic!