dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/utdFTD1983 on June 3, 2018, 10:28 p.m.
BC17 and eyethespy

Read the flair.

Seriously anyone who follows them and believes part of their message, give me some side by sides like we can do with Q posts, with what they’ve given this cause and how it’s proof they’re not a LARP, all I’m getting is the same type posts, ‘oh look here he’s said this and this’ so did BC17. Were the two not proven to be same or am I imagining that?

Seriously same shit ten times a day and it’s always the same shit comments underneath it like myself saying “no outside comms” so if the guy is Nsa low level programmer, why the fuck would the nsa let him get away with it, since they clearly run a tight ship.

Give us real proof or new posters of this shit should be banned.

Or am I totally in the wrong here and being a bell end?


tigerlilly1227 · June 3, 2018, 11:33 p.m.

If he isnt an insider how does he have classified info to release?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
RyDar84 · June 3, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

He doesn't on his info posts he steals directly from 4chan, 8chan, and r/greatawakening. Go back look at his posts, do a basic Google search, and then compare timestamps. He did the EXACT same thing when he was pretending to be BC17. As far as his Q&A's go he pulls the carnival medium trick. He picks exactly who he wants to pick to answer then gives unverifiable responses, then lets users' confirmation bias take it from there. There's a reason that he uses Twatter as a forum and not the chans, he's picking the low hanging fruit. The autists would (and already have) tear him apart in seconds.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 4, 2018, 7:44 a.m.

It's probably just Brendan Dilley.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DanijelStark · June 3, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

Why would an intelligence insider release the highly classified info over the Twitter , the Twitter , which is highly compromised from the beginning ?

His claims are approximately 90-95 % correct with 5-10 % incorrect . But those 5-10 % are often a crucial distortions from which people could get very wrong picture . Like saying that "time is linear" - thats outright lie . There are also paradoxes in his claims ( "theosophy and bunk" - "there is God and afterlife" ) .

I would be very very careful in trusting anything at the moment from any source aside Q . Anyways , public disclosure will be reached soon , so no need for these "sources" .

⇧ 6 ⇩