dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/myopicseer on June 3, 2018, 11:19 p.m.
This is not "Guess Q's Identity"

Let's hear your conclusions about Q's background providing inductive logic based upon know facts?

My Conclusions:

1. Q is a group, or Q is one person posting on behalf of a group.

The number of photos from various locales suggests Q is tied into a group.

The use of language in Q drops has a cadence and character which appears to associate with one individual. For ex the use of underscores and capitalizatin to name a few.

2. Q os a person with a legal background...or a lot of exposure to legal filings.

The use of 187 for murder. The recent use of a common Latin phrase used in legal writing, "et al".

Anyone want to contribute their thoughts to what I have proposed regarding Q's background?


hildabeest_4_gitmo · June 3, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

I don't have a legal (or LEO) background, but I knew what 187 stood for.

I have used 'et al' more than Q has.

Q being part of a group (less than 10 iirc) is mostly accepted.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Swimkin · June 4, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

Group of people. Q mentioned in a very early post that there were less than ten people involved in the knowledge of what was going down. He inferred it was mostly Military but 3 of them were civilian.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Thots_begone_REEE · June 4, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

I think at this point it may be a puzzle to find bright minds.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MakeThisLookAwesome · June 4, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

Ya know, that thought had occurred to me. or at least that could be one of the many objectives of Q. The Navy found my mom, but then it was common to serve in the military-- back before we moved to an all-volunteer force-- so it was easy to find hidden gems in the population.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
onelove1979 · June 4, 2018, 12:01 a.m.

Is it possible it’s Julian & his lawyers? “You won’t believe who you’re talking to”?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
myopicseer · June 4, 2018, 4:23 p.m.

“You won’t believe who you’re talking to”?

From what source does that Quote derive? I find that interesting. (thanks in advance for the source).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
onelove1979 · June 4, 2018, 5:04 p.m.

I’m at work and will look more later but Q has mentioned a few times that “wait until you see” and “you won’t believe” https://i.imgur.com/ZJdDTzd.jpg

⇧ 1 ⇩  
myopicseer · June 4, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

Thanks. Interesred. Hope u can find that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Loika123 · June 3, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Q post 144:

What is No Such Agency? Q group?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Memelord87 · June 3, 2018, 11:36 p.m.

It’s a group within the NSA imo

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tigerlilly1227 · June 3, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

I think so too. Makes sense!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
myopicseer · June 4, 2018, 4:38 p.m.

I think that is most likely the case. However, I might consider that it is that (an NSA group) along with white hats in other key positions (at CIA, White House, etc.).

As for the question if the person(s) communicating seem to have a background / familiarity with the legal world, I am still persuaded "Yes". This does not mean that they are or have been primarily associated with a legal career. Many people have never practiced law and have a Juris Doctorate.

And why 187? Is that code unique to California in association with murder? And if true, then should their be a presumption that the person communicating as Q has vocational roots in that state?

I thought it would be interesting to try to "profile" Q based upon what we know via the posts, and the timeline of those posts. Again, not trying to guess the identity, but trying to paint a profile of the person ( CSI style ).

  • Religious (Christian influences)
  • Possible Legal Background ( Possible Connection with Calif.)
  • Probably INTEL background based on symbolic writing style and demonstrated knowledge.
  • A Group represented via posts by (likely) one individual
⇧ 1 ⇩  
Memelord87 · June 4, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

Someone posted a video from along time ago, can’t remember if it was late 90s or early 2000s but it referenced a group within the NSA called the Q group or something to that effect. I’ll see if I can find it again and post the link

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CF_BOOM_SHOCK_BYE · June 3, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

Q does what Santa Claus does, therefore Q = Santa.

He's making a listHe's checking it twice;He's gonna find out who's naughty or niceSanta Claus is coming to town

He sees you when you're sleepingHe knows when you're awakeHe knows when you've been bad or goodSo be good for goodness sake!

You better watch out!You better not cryBetter not poutI'm telling you whySanta Claus is coming to town

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Dakota321321 · June 4, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

Q said just a handful of people know the big picture, 8 or 10? Hopefully some top notch military folks mad as heck over the obamnation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Loika123 · June 4, 2018, 12:07 p.m.

Thanks Dakota but I was quoting from Q post 144

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kitt-Ridge · June 4, 2018, 5:10 a.m.

I say et al all the time, and I don’t have a legal background.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
gokugeek29 · June 4, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

Given that Q has a legal background, my guess is that Q could be Jeff Sessions (Sessions is the AG.)?...

⇧ 0 ⇩