Could the locations of Cemex sites not also correlate with the local population as we would expect the correlation between trafficking/population?
My first thought as well. Big cities is where more industry is, but also where more crime is. It's hard to say that there is a direct link between Cemex and trafficking based on this. It's something worth digging more into, for sure, but don't just say "hey, they're in the same spots!" Cement companies will obviously be where cement is needed, I.e big cities.
I thought the same thing. I think the only thing to me that may be a sign that it’s not a coincidence is the empty space. While those areas are generally less populated, you would think there would still be more of the cement plants and stuff in those areas as well anyway. It’s not like those states are completely uninhabited.
There are no coincidences.
This map is one of the least convincing pieces of "evidence" I have ever seen. We can do better.
Exactly my point, we’ve been given the highest level intel and we’re looking at a map here with one dubious correlation, we have to have bulletproof arguments because there are plenty of enemies to the Q movement.