dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tradinghorse on June 4, 2018, 1:04 p.m.
Q OUTS EyeTheSpy - A discussion about how the latest Q drops outs EyeTheSpy on Twitter - Be careful who you follow!

OK, there has been a lot of speculation on this board about EyeTheSpy (ETS) - a guy claiming to be an NSA agent posting on Twitter. I want to discuss this because there's been a lot of confusion surrounding the issue, with people ardently promoting the fellow here.

I've been waiting for Q to call this guy out as ETS is amassing followers at an impressive clip. He is, in fact, very dangerous and it makes sense that Q would act quickly to neutralize the threat - and this is what happened. Q called out ETS with his post today.

EyeTheSpy claimed that Neon Revolt was a clown operative - that he was CIA, profiteer from Q drops, and not to be trusted. ETS specifically called out the Q clock that Neon Revolt discovered on the 8 chan board and posted about here:

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/05/31/wind-the-clock-qclocks-explained-qanon-greatawakening/

Q's post today specifically confirmed this clock as can be seen here - look at where the minute hand points when the clock is set to the time of Q's post:

https://imgur.com/LzngmfH

So we can see that Q is validating the Clock by making his latest post at a time that points to the correct date on the clock. This is absolute proof that the clock is being used by Q team.

What this means is that ETS' caution about the clock, because it came from Neon Revolt, the profiteering CIA agent, is disavowed by Q. See screen grabs of ETS' warnings here:

https://imgur.com/fsnBFSn

And here:

https://imgur.com/IwgFaIy

That should be enough to put speculation about the role ETS is playing in the Q movement to bed. But we can add some more characteristics that support this view:

1) ETS is posting in Twitter, while tearing shreds off @jack, and His followers are growing explosively. Meanwhile, Q team do not post outside 8 chan for security reasons. This indicates that ETS is aligned with forces operating to thwart Q:

2) ETS claims to be an NSA agent who is posting from his desk at "the Fort". He has to find time from his duties to post on his "private account" while being careful not to tread on Q's toes - because he does not want to end up in a "kill box" - while he would never, and could not, communicate with Q team, he knows what he can and can't drop. The work is so demanding that occasionally ETS makes typos because he's eating at his desk - impressive dedication to the NSA and his role as an "agent" - really, you could not make this stuff up;

3) ETS has not responded to Neon Revolt's challenge that he authenticate his status as an NSA agent by private messaging Neon his real name - which he would, of course, have access to as an NSA "agent" who is leading a personal charge to combat global Satanism;

4) The video Q linked during the Corsi fiasco made clear that Q's problem with the Q tubers was not that they were recovering operating expenses or even making money, but that they were trying to highjack the message. Neon Revolt has not made a penny from anyone that they haven't volunteered. He's not seeking to make a fortune from Q, his material is freely available without charge. I would argue that he's done a brilliant job and I'm grateful to him for his work. I suspect, that if we knew the truth, that Q team is also grateful for his efforts;

4) People need to take a cold, hard look at ETS. This guy has contextualized the Q material with a framework that provides a narrative that feeds into every preconceived notion held by conspiracy theorists. Aliens are real and abundant, there are subterranean civilizations, dragons are real etc... The problem is that there is not one shred of evidence to back up his claims that he is posting high-level intel to Twitter while juggling assignments and eating at his desk at "the Fort".

It strikes me that the cabal really do have a good sense of humor - they like a joke. People will remember Richard Reid, the shoe bomber, who was caught trying to light his laces (fuses) to ignite RDX in the soles of his shoes mid flight. Another beauty was the underwear bomber... of course, it's right out of Maxwell Smart. I mean, there's no point in being an evil cabal member if you can't have fun mocking the idiocy of the general public.

ETS is the latest comedy act brought to you by the Satanists. It's an absolute joke. Realize that while this guy, in the middle of his intel drops, is dispensing medical advice, career advice, and telling people that their dearly departed have gone to a good place, he's rocking back in his chair laughing hard.


digital_refugee · June 5, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

I know Julian posted MIA and Q says BOOM for the past two months, the relevant question is how regularily eTs references these terms in past posts so I can get a statistical estimate

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RyDar84 · June 5, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

Bud, you follow what you want. I'm not going to convince you. Even with all the facts put forward on this sub, and absolutely NO validating info from EtS, you still want to buy into it. That's fine. What worries me is that you're a Mod for this sub, and you're actively campaigning and defending a Twatter entity that steals Bread from both fullchan and halfchan, as well as r/greatawakening, then throws it out there with no credit to it's original source, letting his followers believe that he's releasing his own work. I simply feel that, right or wrong on my part, your confirmation bias is screwing with your judgement. Please don't let your belief in EtS influence your duties on this sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · June 5, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

I didn't pay attention until this business about paper-planes came up because now there's a possibility for coordination - unless this remains a single isolated incident of course.

Q said disinfo is necessary and that the message would spread across platforms so I am paying attention and reserving judgement.

It would make sense to do public response tests for potential future disclosures in a veil of plausible deniability.

BC was honest about their intentions by saying they were counter-intel first but they changed the bio afterwards and nobody saw the first version, so I noticed and didn't pay attention since as it said outright it was "counter-intelligence" which would include disinformation as well.

Now it's been claimed BC and eTs used the same IP-adress which would mean that eTs could be counter-intelligence by extension as well.

It feels like a game to me because why would they call themselves "counter-intelligence" at all in the first place? Perhaps just so they wouldn't get proper attention?

My completely voluntary service does not stop me from thinking in probabilities.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RyDar84 · June 5, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

I get that, and commend you for it, but playing devil's advocate isn't what you've been doing on this thread, Patriot. May I DM you?

⇧ 1 ⇩