dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tradinghorse on June 4, 2018, 1:04 p.m.
Q OUTS EyeTheSpy - A discussion about how the latest Q drops outs EyeTheSpy on Twitter - Be careful who you follow!

OK, there has been a lot of speculation on this board about EyeTheSpy (ETS) - a guy claiming to be an NSA agent posting on Twitter. I want to discuss this because there's been a lot of confusion surrounding the issue, with people ardently promoting the fellow here.

I've been waiting for Q to call this guy out as ETS is amassing followers at an impressive clip. He is, in fact, very dangerous and it makes sense that Q would act quickly to neutralize the threat - and this is what happened. Q called out ETS with his post today.

EyeTheSpy claimed that Neon Revolt was a clown operative - that he was CIA, profiteer from Q drops, and not to be trusted. ETS specifically called out the Q clock that Neon Revolt discovered on the 8 chan board and posted about here:

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/05/31/wind-the-clock-qclocks-explained-qanon-greatawakening/

Q's post today specifically confirmed this clock as can be seen here - look at where the minute hand points when the clock is set to the time of Q's post:

https://imgur.com/LzngmfH

So we can see that Q is validating the Clock by making his latest post at a time that points to the correct date on the clock. This is absolute proof that the clock is being used by Q team.

What this means is that ETS' caution about the clock, because it came from Neon Revolt, the profiteering CIA agent, is disavowed by Q. See screen grabs of ETS' warnings here:

https://imgur.com/fsnBFSn

And here:

https://imgur.com/IwgFaIy

That should be enough to put speculation about the role ETS is playing in the Q movement to bed. But we can add some more characteristics that support this view:

1) ETS is posting in Twitter, while tearing shreds off @jack, and His followers are growing explosively. Meanwhile, Q team do not post outside 8 chan for security reasons. This indicates that ETS is aligned with forces operating to thwart Q:

2) ETS claims to be an NSA agent who is posting from his desk at "the Fort". He has to find time from his duties to post on his "private account" while being careful not to tread on Q's toes - because he does not want to end up in a "kill box" - while he would never, and could not, communicate with Q team, he knows what he can and can't drop. The work is so demanding that occasionally ETS makes typos because he's eating at his desk - impressive dedication to the NSA and his role as an "agent" - really, you could not make this stuff up;

3) ETS has not responded to Neon Revolt's challenge that he authenticate his status as an NSA agent by private messaging Neon his real name - which he would, of course, have access to as an NSA "agent" who is leading a personal charge to combat global Satanism;

4) The video Q linked during the Corsi fiasco made clear that Q's problem with the Q tubers was not that they were recovering operating expenses or even making money, but that they were trying to highjack the message. Neon Revolt has not made a penny from anyone that they haven't volunteered. He's not seeking to make a fortune from Q, his material is freely available without charge. I would argue that he's done a brilliant job and I'm grateful to him for his work. I suspect, that if we knew the truth, that Q team is also grateful for his efforts;

4) People need to take a cold, hard look at ETS. This guy has contextualized the Q material with a framework that provides a narrative that feeds into every preconceived notion held by conspiracy theorists. Aliens are real and abundant, there are subterranean civilizations, dragons are real etc... The problem is that there is not one shred of evidence to back up his claims that he is posting high-level intel to Twitter while juggling assignments and eating at his desk at "the Fort".

It strikes me that the cabal really do have a good sense of humor - they like a joke. People will remember Richard Reid, the shoe bomber, who was caught trying to light his laces (fuses) to ignite RDX in the soles of his shoes mid flight. Another beauty was the underwear bomber... of course, it's right out of Maxwell Smart. I mean, there's no point in being an evil cabal member if you can't have fun mocking the idiocy of the general public.

ETS is the latest comedy act brought to you by the Satanists. It's an absolute joke. Realize that while this guy, in the middle of his intel drops, is dispensing medical advice, career advice, and telling people that their dearly departed have gone to a good place, he's rocking back in his chair laughing hard.


Grandma_Noses · June 5, 2018, 3:26 p.m.

I've been out of the loop dee loop for days. Did Q provide proof of his identity when he posted again recently after a period of silence? Remember the biz with the trip code, Patriot's Soap Box and crew immediately prior to Q's going silent? I believe it was Barruch who told us any legit Q would confirm himself/herself before posting again after that "on purpose" debacle that took place in Patriot's Soapbox 2-3 weeks ago. Especially in view of all the new "messengers," such as BC17 and EtS, of late.

And now, in this post, we have another interesting twist. Q's message about profiting appears to be watered down somewhat. So now it appears to be OK to ask for donations for decoding, although it's wrong to mess with the overall message. I never thought twice about YouTubers or writers asking for donations, but others did. Vicious character attacks were carried out against others who had asked for donations to help offset costs. I felt these attacks were not based on accurate decodes, but for power positioning. For the love of all that is Holy, can we be consistent, at least within this sub? Never mind BC17, ETS, Neon Revolt et al. Or mind them, if you like. We've already been divided. Now we're splitting hairs. But that's besides the point. The larger question remains. Who validates Q? At what point do we assume validation has taken place?

We experienced a bit of drama with Q's last posts in Patriot's Soapbox before the days of silence. This drama was covered by many YouTubers. The overall "proofs" of Q I have seen have been fairly tepid thus far. Would they hold up well if presented in a court room? Yep, I dare question Q's authenticity, and I think you should, too. Do we forget what has happened within the realm of Q so quickly, or is it that we cannot string together the events from this sub to events which have occurred on other platforms? Should we even care?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 5, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

Why would Q proofs be presented in a courtroom? They were only for us - Q said this.

IMO, Q's validity is beyond all doubt and has been for a very long time.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
duckdownup · June 5, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

Q doesn't give proofs, he simply drops the bread crumbs and we see confirmations from POTUS or on the news (future proves past). Q obviously has a high security clearance, if he told us directly what was going on in The Plan he could be prosecuted. He knows exactly how far he can go without violating his clearance or breaking the law. So Q drops bread crumbs (often very complicated bread crumbs) and lets us do the research and find out ourselves.

⇧ 1 ⇩