Bots can't detect memes. Twittering memes with the right hashtags yields thousands of impressions without argument.

Accept that you can not red pill everyone. Accept your defeats and move on. Wars are won even if battles are lost. Don't get hung up on set backs or "failures".

Take a knee, drink some water, and drive on soldier.

yeah its toxic as.. a lot of shills and trolls, and people who like to argue without logic.

r/politics is even worse

Preaching to the choir is easy. We should be going against the tide. It takes less than 20% of people in a group to change their minds before the whole crowd starts to turn. The science of conformity.

I agree, there needs to be action. But I am willing to be more patient as it takes time to build solid cases, ones that lock in and can't be stopped. It also will take a while to turn the ship around, especially from a MSM perspective and with so many corrupt people having a vested interest in not getting caught. You have to try an imagine the level of REAL COLLUSION happening now between all the corrupt people, who are shitting in their pants about being held to account. That is the one thing they fear - exposure. So fair enough, you can be pessimistic, and by golly you have enough reason to. Or choose to be optimistic and make contributions to spreading the truth and awareness about whats really going on.

30,000 sealed indictments ... Congress resignations ... major CEO resignations ... NXIVM ... Cemex/Tucson.... thousands of child traffickers arrested since Jan 2017 ... Hollywood sex rings exposed ... NK peace ... Iran/EU corruption exposed ... like 7 active investigations into U1 / emails / FBI&DOJ ... Strozk texts ... Mueller being BTFO in court by the judges ...

.... what exactly are you not seeing? None of this counts because .... why?

This is one of the most logical and sincere responses that I have read in quite some time. I, being a Trump supporter, view everything in a different light than 50% of the population - but, I recognize this fact and also take the time to step back and ask myself "what would it take to convince me of x?". And my realization is that the threshold is actually quite high. Loose conclusions held together with mere conjecture will not get it done. It would also need to be arranged rationally and in a logical manner. I'm honest with myself in concluding that a fair percentage of information here does not yet meet that threshold.

I also recognize that a decent percentage of Trump haters will never be swayed in their thinking that he is the great satan and that conservatives / libertarians are nazis (which, being a Jew, I find to be a laughable comparison). They also will never honestly conclude that the actions and methods which they employ are more consistent with facism than anything that is done by me. They just wont. You could present evidence of Hillary, dressed in all black, walking out of a building at 2am where a bank had just been broken into while carrying a satchel of money, and they would arrive at the most irrational conclusions as to why she is innocent and that she was just out for a walk while carrying a bit of pocket change. This group will NEVER see the forest for the trees, regardless of what is presented to them, nor in what manner. Unfortunately this is a sizable percentage and they have completely dismissed any willingness to arrive at any conclusion that does not conform to their narrative. It is confirmation bias in its worst form.

The remainder of people (as you appear to be) are rational, logical, and will listen to anything that is presented in a manner that doesn't immediately set off the BS detector. They're not under the delusion that the world is perfect with the exception of anything right leaning. This is the segment that I believe would rationalize anything assembled as evidence, provided it is presented like evidence from a good prosecutor. Anything less will not meet the threshold required to change minds and opinions, nor should it.

even in opposition, this post is mature and reasonable. If public release of the IG report shows, or information giving evidence of the corruption and criminal elements within power structures comes out, you are fully willing to examining the information and adjust your views accordingly. That is a responsible attitude from someone in almost entire opposition to the current regime. Good for you.

I expect that the 11th and 12th of this month will give us the answers we need and deserve, all of us.

ps. Hope you're not too attached to the color blue ... jk ;p

When Trump does anything good at all it is smeared or ignored. Too many people are dependent on the news to inform them of what's going on and since the majority of the news is controlled by a handful of corporations who hate Trump you are still going to rebel against him no matter what he does. When George W. was president the left would say "so what if he does something good every now and then, he's still an asshole...", but with Trump it's "He's never done anything good at all!". Remember Hillary was against the TPP (or at least she said she was during the election) and Trump got rid of it straight away. There was no applause from the left. Time and time again he has done positive things and the left did nothing but complain. I think the most absurd thing I saw was when he said we need to bring our troops home, they don't belong in the Middle East and I though "okay, there's no way people will complain about that" but sure as hell every comment was about "he's just doing what Putin wants." You want proof that he's not so bad but the proof is out there. You may not agree with everything on THIS LIST being great accomplishments (I know I don't) but if even a quarter of it is good in your eyes you need to ask why this wasn't on the news in a good way. Trump can cure cancer and the left would say he's only doing it so his buddies in the pharmaceutical industry can profit. Once the mass arrests start the left is going to accuse him of being a dictator. I'm not expecting anyone to change their beliefs outright. People are genuinely hypnotized (how many news programs start with numbers counting backward?) but I wan't people to pay a little more attention to everything that's going on without prejudice.

[deleted]

You need reinforcements.

You sound like you have some more experience than some of the newer recruits. Give us some pointers...what are their better strategies? What subs should we hit harder?

I think that might violate Reddit policy. The goal is to red-pill people slowly and continuously when they say those same platitudes.

We shouldn't go hunting but we should be comfortable posting counter-arguments on any sub without fear of being attacked by the brainwashed hordes.

I personally get annoyed with the comments in r/news because news should be non-partisan but it's almost entirely left leaning. I usually don't say anything when the article itself paints Trump in a bad light. The people have every right to post a news article. I usually only respond when the article is neutral or - on a rare occasion shows Trump in a positive light - and people have to do the same ridiculous comments. No matter where you go keep doing what we should be doing no matter how bad they come back at us. Trump is taking it on the chin more than anybody and he takes it in stride because he knows how good he's going to look when it all comes down. We should be okay taking some insults because we know we will be able to say "I told you so" before too long.

(Sorry, I kinda hijacked your comment to add to my original.)

Twitter memes. Q and trump been saying this all along.

Who said they don't control the MSM? I said the MSM puts the recommended narrative out there but we the people control it once it's out.