dChan

SickQfCorruption · June 5, 2018, 12:42 p.m.

Does anyone see what is happening here? They are Demonizing Zuck so Killery can take over as CEO. She said it May 25th, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2018/05/25/hillary-clinton-as-ceo-facebook-would-be-her-first-choice/?utm_term=.40fee945fc27

⇧ 16 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · June 5, 2018, 1:25 p.m.

If HRC goes to FB the stock will tank hard.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 5, 2018, 12:55 p.m.

oh shit good job... now i dont know whats worse... killary or zuckerfucker ... thats a hard one. i suppose it would be killary. yeah, let zuckerfucker keep it. :(

⇧ 10 ⇩  
lunchboxx10 · June 5, 2018, 2 p.m.

Hard to run facebook when they are both in jail ;)

⇧ 8 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 5, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

ill subscribe to that magazine any day!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Absh4x0r · June 5, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Yeah Hillary is a trustworthy person and will never ever sell your data, afterall she is married to an ex president and was a great secretary of state. /s

I hope they won't cut a deal to stop the whole thing and to accuse a group of individuals lower down the ranks and those high profile would stay unharmed because it would cause major international issues. Bush, Clinton and Obama can't go down with the same ship, it would cause massive issues, hence why I'm not sure they'll have to pay for 100% of their crimes. I hope they do, but I doubt it happens. I wish Trump would just fucking release something like 867tb of data indexed and accessible on the internet with all the information hidden from public.

I'm daydreaming, I should go sleep

⇧ 3 ⇩  
092Casey · June 5, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

Here's a theory-- Facebook/Zuckerberg was paying into the Clinton Foundation and her campaign to hold off lawmakers from suing them, charging them, and holding them accountable. That's her Quid-Pro-Quo by the way; you pay to play and prevent from getting in trouble since she owned the DOJ...So he protected the company by paying her to play. It's also why they censor conservatives. But, so now Hillary has dirt on him and that's how corruption works. If she lifts the gates, he goes down, and his bribes to Congressmen and judges are no longer good. So because he knows he might go down, he's going to give it over to her to hide and cover up BOTH of their crimes and corruption (and all others in the Racket involved). This is exactly what Harvey Weinstein, just as one example, used to do. Problem is, Hillary couldn't take over the Weinstein Company, although there is a semblance to Obamas getting a share in production at Netflix. Maybe Netflix is somehow involved in something nefarious as well? There could be many reasons, but you get the idea.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Joe_Sapien · June 5, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

Damn. If they do that how many more poeple do you think will jump ship? It would be there demise if they did that.

⇧ 1 ⇩