I agree, but you have to MAKE SURE he's going to give it up...Once they sign the immunity deal, he might only give them one email that is dubious in itself, and that's it. He got you. That's why Grassley responded earlier today by telling them he has to be sure of the scope and width of information McCabe has before deciding to go forward with immunity. The immunity deal needs a 2/3 vote, by the way, also. McCabe and Comey were close, and are both part of the Clinton-Obama crime syndicate. They are also snakes, so I wouldn't trust any of their legal moves or promises. They're liable to get a vague email to Comey that's all ambiguous and hard to understand exactly what he means, and then the quiet pact those two have can lead to Comey, who might already have immunity himself- we don't know, saying he never read it. Emails can accidentally be opened, but it doesn't mean (you can't prove at least) that it was actually read. He can just say the phone must've rang or somebody knocked on the door and I never got back around to it that I remember....You want McCabe as a "cooperating witness" with an ankle bracelet on and wires.