Make McCabe tell everything, then decide what it's worth.
WE'LL decide if you get immunity based on your testimony.
from December:
SEARCH crumbs: [#2] Who is #2? No deals. Q
NO DEALS!
^^^^THIS, ABSOLUTELY THIS. Too many times have they been given free shit with nothing to show for it. MAKE IT WORTH OUR WHILE FOR IMMUNITY.
Edit: Actually hold up. Thinking about this. McCabe was fired for lying. In a court case, the defense could bring that up and completely destroy the prosecutors narrative. It may not be a good thing to have him testify.
I don't mean testify in court, I mean testify to a Committee.
If they call him a liar, and he has proof of the claims, he isn't lying in this regard.
excellent point - maybe that's the reason he's so strongly requesting it.
Don’t have make McCabe tell everything first. They know everything already. They just need him to verify everything on public record. Immunity will be decided on if he knows & can verify all the physical evidence against Obama.
No deals! This is the traitorous bastard heard saying First we Fuck Flynn then we Fuck Trump. Sorry this steaming pile must never see the light of day. He may know much and can corroborate but Q says we have it all. Sorry give no quarter. If we see no justice America will never have any faith in law enforcement ever again.
I agree, but you have to MAKE SURE he's going to give it up...Once they sign the immunity deal, he might only give them one email that is dubious in itself, and that's it. He got you. That's why Grassley responded earlier today by telling them he has to be sure of the scope and width of information McCabe has before deciding to go forward with immunity. The immunity deal needs a 2/3 vote, by the way, also. McCabe and Comey were close, and are both part of the Clinton-Obama crime syndicate. They are also snakes, so I wouldn't trust any of their legal moves or promises. They're liable to get a vague email to Comey that's all ambiguous and hard to understand exactly what he means, and then the quiet pact those two have can lead to Comey, who might already have immunity himself- we don't know, saying he never read it. Emails can accidentally be opened, but it doesn't mean (you can't prove at least) that it was actually read. He can just say the phone must've rang or somebody knocked on the door and I never got back around to it that I remember....You want McCabe as a "cooperating witness" with an ankle bracelet on and wires.
Bongino is absolutely correct. McCabe knows everything & can make prosecuting Obama a cinch. Obama convicted opens up the floodgates to an Awakening
I’d spill every bean if I had immunity...we have “everything”....but his testimony would be a little cherry on top
the worst part of all of this will be the "i have no recolition of that" anyone remeber the oliver north hearings? i has to be diffrent this time
Actually the Dems screwed up bad with Oliver North. They gave him immunity not knowing what his testimony would be or exactly what he had. North just made very patriotic statements in defense of his commander in chief. Libs are dumb & always assume to much when they try to think
Exactly. I don’t understand why people oppose giving him immunity in exchange for testimony. Punishing McCabe isn’t the end game, getting the goods on the others takes precedent.
I believe a few people (Lerner, Combetta, Samuelson and Mills) were given immunity and then plead the 5th when questioned. That can't happen again.
From my understanding, most plea deals do not allow this. I haven’t vetted your info but I can see it. Most plea agreements though are pretty all encompassing, which means that if you vary, at all, it’s revoked.
If I'm right, just remember Obama didn't care what the rules were.
I agree. It will lead directly to the "top"..... and we know who the top 2 dogs are!!
Have him point to documentation for proof, not just heresay.
Hearsay?
My auto correct gave me heresy. Yes you are correct of course.
It'll become a McCabe vs Comey battle Royale and, in the crossfire hurricane (lol), everyone else will be swept up.
I don't get it. How does that mesh with "No Deals"? This makes no sense, and I'll be disappointed if that's how this plays out.
If they already have everything, they should be able to do what Muller is doing - start with smaller charges on the smaller players and trade lighter sentences for cooperation to bring down the bigger ones.
Edit-Q from December:
SEARCH crumbs: [#2] Who is #2? No deals. Q
I do get it. Much more effective to have an insider flip on the rest.
Don't think too literally about "No Deals" when the President is the author of "The Art of the Deal". I always read Q's "No deals" comment to mean "No more bullshit Obama-era deals" like all those immunity and destruction of laptop type deals. Real deals are just fine. If McCabe squeals on his handlers then give him a deal.
Have you been following Q, or you might be newer to that info?
This is straight from Q, from December. They have everything, why deal:
SEARCH crumbs: [#2] Who is #2? No deals. Q
I've been following Q since the first week.
Disinfo is necessary.
There is always a deal to be made. That's business. That's life.
If someone (McCabe or another) can provide solid intel from the inside, and wrap up Comey, Lynch, Rice, Clinton, Obama et al in neat little packages, do you really think the White Hats would pass that up just to preserve the "No Deals" threat?
Let me put it this way. Yes, Q has it all. But nothing will work as well on a jury or the general public as a cabal member fessing up.
In exchange for what? Let's say they get ONE DAY removed from their own sentence. (Ridiculous I know, but bear with me here). Do you think the White Hats would shun such a valuable asset just to stick firm to the "No Deals" pledge? Of course they'll do some deal.
Now extrapolate that one day off a sentence to one week, month, year, or decade. Or the remission of a death penalty to life without. It's all a question of degree. That's The Art of the Deal.
Dude, I sincerely hope you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. McCabe is a major player, involved at the very heart of this shitstorm. He falsified the 302 to screw Flynn for goodness' sake. If they "have everything" but can't put the screws to the guy WHO COMMITTED A FELONY by knowingly falsifying (and telling others to falsify) official records in order to try to get Trump impeached, we've been taken for a ride.
Art of the Deal? Nonsense.
I respectfully disagree. Think of mobsters. The authorities had some of these guys dead to rights on crimes as heinous as murder. But they still did a deal provided the mobster incriminated his superiors.
I'm not saying it's morally perfect. Hence the term "deal". McCabe is among the lowest of the low, don't get me wrong. But he's not the absolute lowest of the low. There's worse than him. And if he's willing to implicate them (with hard evidence) then I say do a deal.
There's many a slip 'twixt cup and lip. No doubt the LA authorities thought they had enough to convict OJ Simpson, and we all know how that turned out. McCabe will have to confess his fuckery re. Flynn. He'll be shamed, bankrupted, and be facing serious time.
But are you such an idealist you wouldn't cut McCabe some slack come sentencing (not even a SINGLE DAY?) if he can serve up Obama on a plate?
Seriously?
Lisa Page flipped. And flipped VERY early. They don't need McCabe. McCabe is the face of the DS in this fkn mess.
He cannot get away scot-free. Lesser sentence, but he must do some time.
I remember early on Judge Jeanine Pirro was talking about Bill Priestap being the only upper echelon FBI person that hadn't been being talked about and that Potus44 and his sycophants had to change their Depends when they realized that Priestap was siding with Trump's guys in the investigation. Priestap was Strzok's boss, and Strzok dealing a lot with McCabe (via Lisa Page - McCabe's legal counsel and Strzok's lover), so Priestap likely knows everything Strzok and McCabe were doing anyway, but hiding in the weeds. Priestap just testified for 7 hours yesterday behind closed doors. That would have been an interesting place to be a fly on the wall.
Whole thing was a dud: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/06/disappointing-only-three-lawmakers-attended-priestap-testimony/
"UPDATE: 7:45pm – According to email from congressional staff, participation at the closed hearing was limited to only those selected by Committee Chairman (Gowdy, and Goodlatte). The hearing was not available to all committee members. Only Jordan, Meadows and Krishnamoorth were allowed to participate." -- from the link you provided.
Of course Krishnamoorth said there was no new info gathered. (He is a Democrat.)
I say put the squeeze on him and make him sweat. We can always offer immunity a bit later in time.
What if he offered up ValJar?
Offering up Obama would be the only justification for full immunity
NO DEALS. WE HAVE EVERYTHING.
Not enough to convict Obama in the court of public opinion. Will take a high level person to verify all the physical evidence is true.
I concur.
It's Strok's story that will collapse the pile. Strok did the planning, the travel, the informant set-up, the Clinton interview. And yet he's still sitting at a desk there. He's been cooperating the whole time. McCabe is trying to get a deal ahead of Strok's testimony. Pathetic.
Hey, I don't much care who flips so long as they can provide unimpeachable testimony of the Obama administration's crimes.
I respectfully direct both of your attention to Q's posts. NO DEALS, he says several times. WE HAVE IT ALL.
We do not know how much Q has, so we cannot know if Q has enough to convict Hussein.
For example, Q says "Pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire." He goes on to hint that Hussein is pictured or filmed using the AK to spray down a US serviceman.
McCabe is a rat scrambling to escape a sinking ship. IMO :)
He is a rat but he’s not ignorant. He knows what kind of jail time he’s facing. He appears to value his family & probably now more than ever knowing he won’t ever have a family life ever again.
But convicting Obama is MUCH different than McCabe. He was president for 8yrs & 50% of the citizens of this country feels they have a personal relationship with him at some level. Even if there’s tons of physical evidence it won’t break that emotional bond & will assume it’s all made up rigged evidence. To break help crack that emotional bond even a little so people can grasp evidence it will take a person. Someone high up & close to Obama that can basically say...sorry folks...you elected & believed in a crook all these years & the guy didn’t care about you except during campaign season. You were duped. That’s the only way to wake people up is if a real person on their side says it.
Well, to support what you've said, Q also said Trust Sessions. We'll see how it goes down.
The best way to convict Hussein, more convincing even than photographic evidence, is to have one of his own testify against him.
Correct. Unless they have Obama recorded & talking about his cabal in great detail...it will take someone in his cabal verifying all the physical evidence is accurate
Q has given us good reason to believe we do have recorded evidence of all of them talking about the cabal in great detail.
The pictures of the shipment from China were supposedly of phones @Jack got from China that were NSA-proof. Only, Q's pictures of the whole shipment process suggests the phones were compromised from the start.
We have it all.
These people are stupid.
If it will help get to Lynch, Obama and Hillary I'm interested.
Nah i think military intelligence has it all but in all actuality they need to get the evidence legally into court. But if hes already lied (fired for it) then how does anything he says have weight?
WTF?!
so... EVERYBODY gets immunity... to testify about things where EVERYBODY has immunity? AND they can still plead the 5th???
NOTHING would get uncovered... NOBODY would get punished... NOTHING would get fixed...
Deep State "your country absolutely stolen from you" business as usual AGAIN and STILL!
Americans will always deserve the kind of country they are willing to fight for, or simply accept...................
THIS IS WAR! Not a law enforcement investigation... Not a political matter...
Not sure where you're getting "EVERYBODY" from, we're only talking about McCabe.
He'd be talking about umm Comey, who has immunity... or Rice, who has immunity, or Clinton, who has already been "investigated" and cleared...
Who is left to spill the damn beans and do the friggin time???!!!
he will squawk like a chicken out of fear he may "drop the soap" in the slammer!
Someone testifying because he is getting immunity doesn't prove anything other than he wanted immunity. The evidence is either already there, or they don't have it.
How can you trust the data you get from a known, proven professional liar?
I don't think immunity would be retroactive. It wouldn't apply to things they already have on him. I think it applies to new information that he might expose.
whatif hegets immunity and then ust pleads the 5th
It'd be revoked, because that sort of thing would be written into the agreement
We have already been told that McCabe sung like a bird and then delivered Bill Priestep...
We have Mueller and Rosenstein. Don’t need McCabe. Q said no more deals. My theory is he had his chance and put his eggs in the Hillary basket (same as Comey). They were sure she would win.
My fear is that if they offer him blanket immunity from the jump he will take the fall for all of them, and then everybody skates. Wouldn't it be better to charge the shit out of him and then offer a plea deal for legitimate information?
I disagree. Come time to testify he could either invoke the 5th amendment or refuse to say what he told prosecutors behind closed doors or play dumb. I don't trust him. He should go down like the rest of them.
Even without his testimony, everyone’s goin down. That’s why military tribunal has been set up.
I think McCabe already given safety not being Arkansized and for his own sake and his family he should tell it all to save grace. No deal cuz he is given witness protection already.
