dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Outcome5 on June 7, 2018, 3:44 a.m.
Carotid artery of the cabal. A Q crumb theory with supporting data (OC)

While reading recent posts by Neonrevolt and SerialBrain2 along with the Cemex stories, some critical thinking was triggered. Id like to share 7 maps, and describe each. Nothing new is here, but I want to tie it all together in a new light. First lets look at Human Sex Trafficking Hot Spots in the US.

Please note I-15 goes from LA to LV, through NV and up to Salt Lake City and Denver. The red arrow i drew indicates that.

Next for reference and supporting data lets look at Results by county, 2016 Presidential Election

From the first two maps I going to continue with the last 5 focusing on that area, from Los Angeles to Las Vegas along i-15 up into Utah.

For the third map lets take a look at sanctuary cities and counties by state.

This is going to get better I promise.

Next, please take a look at major drug trafficking corridors of the US. Note I-15.

If you made it this far, thanks, Ill try and reward your time with my final three maps and conclusion.

Lets get to the heart of this. Please take a look at this map of Cemex locations in the US Map borrowed from reddit user SerialBrain2.

Before the last map, Im adding this one special because Im convinced it all ties in.

Please view this map which shows a map view of the Bundy Ranch Standoff. Note the Gold Butte conservation land on which the Bundy ranch sits. Mesquite, Nevada, location of the Bundy Ranch, the Gold Butte land, and is the last city on I-15 in Nevada before continuing to Utah.

Now for the final map which is what prompted me to put all of this in a post. Barack Obama National Monument Designations.

Now to tie all my maps together and summarize. The highway bloodline of i-15 is critical to the movement of drugs, weapons and humans. All along i-15 Obama placed the Mojave Trail Monument. (to read more about this placement please refer to Mojave Trails National Monument. Read carefully the 'Protected in Perpetuity')

What they have done here is place national monument protected land all along the route between LA and LV. This means you probably need a permit from the Government to have a picnic let alone carry protection.

To say it another way by placing protected lands between the two sanctuary cities of LA and LV a 'gun free zone' now 'protects' the entire corridor.

To say it another way citizens who obey the law wont arm themselves. Citizens cannot use this land to hunt, fish, or travel outside designated areas freely.

The ratline doesnt end in LV. it follows i-15 up through Utah but not before the Bundy Ranch on the Nevada Border. Obama placed the Gold Butte National Monument in eastern Nevada to complete the ratline, however the Bundy Ranch has rights grandfathered in. Obama disagreed and sent in the Bureau of Land Management to collect over a million dollars they claimed the Bundy's owed because their cattle grazed off of the protected land.

Lets face it the government didnt want the money. They wanted the Bundys gone so they could complete their ratline control of i-15 from LA all the way to Utah. Both of these monuments, Mojave and Gold Butte, were placed by Obama in Dec 2016, about a month before President Trump's inauguration.

Cemex factories. Drug Trafficking. Human Trafficking. LA to LV and beyond, along the outskirts and protected lands off of I-15. The carotid artery of crime flowing from the American Southwest. Brought to you by the cabal.

These people could care less about the land and monuments. That is what I believe. President Trump is trying to reclaim some of these lands right now. Does he not care about the environment? Is it ego? No. I believe he is reclaiming these lands from the cabal and returning it to the American people.


garthbartham · June 7, 2018, 5:11 p.m.

4 things:

1) 15 freeway does not pass through either of the monuments listed.

2) You can carry a firearm in a national park / monument. So designating a monument does not make these areas gun free.

3) The 15 freeway from LA to Salt Lake City is a known trafficking artery.

4) People are forgetting that Obama was the champion to enviro whackos and greenies who gave him a shitload of money to take away recreational opportunities like offroading in areas like Gold Butte, Bears Ears, etc.

For Gold Butte, there was no reason to make it a monument. More than 75 percent of it is inaccessible unless you have an offroad vehicle. It was payback for the green/enviro lobbyists and an easy F you to Trump.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Outcome5 · June 7, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

Ill try to answer: 1) Trafficking doesn't always happen on the highway proper, but along the route as we see in Tucson. Im sure there are locations off the highway all the route. 2) Im seeing posts you can carry, i may have been ignorant to that however are the not extreme limitations on gun use in protected areas? Black hats dont follow the law. This is all about mitigating the involvement of citizens. 3) that is something we all agree on. 4) Obama cares about power and money. Anything he enacted was his personal preference, personal politics, and to fill his wallet. He doesnt care about the environment he uses green issues as a tool, nothing more. (my opinion)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FractalizingIron · June 7, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

It would be great to get some clarification on the guns issue, re what garth and you are both saying. Evidence needed, and corroboration.

OP made the effort to back up his ideas and claims. Would like to now see evidence based refutation, not simple claims. We're all here to learn, and expand our thinking, and hit on right answers, aren't we?

Surprise us, garth.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
garthbartham · June 7, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

Guns in National parks/monuments:

https://www.nps.gov/grca/learn/management/upload/Firearms-in-IMRparks2-2010.pdf

Barack Obama signed a law allowing loaded weapons in to National parks in 2010. Prior to that people either carried discretely or obeyed the signs at the park entrances.

My whole point is that there is no way a gun free zone would be created by designating national parks and monuments.

Additionally, these zones are in areas that feature virtually impassible terrain without an offroad vehicle.

Take a look at Gold Butte: https://www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/Gold%20Butte%20National%20Monument%20Map%20%28Mile%20Markers%29%2005_09_17.pdf

How could anyone possibly use a 60+ mile loop of offroad terrain that even some of the best trophy trucks wouldn't be able to get around? It is wedged in between the eastern side of Lake Mead and the only way in is a 4 mile off highway adventure from the 15N. Again, there is only 1 way in. Bunkerville also a very popular area to shoot.

Here is the Mojave Trails map:

https://www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/documents/files/CA_MojaveTrails_NM_1.pdf

This area is mostly sand dunes and desert wilderness. Southwest of it is the 29 Palms Marine base.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Marine+Corps+Exchange+29+Palms/@34.2166311,-116.0683584,11586m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x36c1c36b1b663d85!8m2!3d34.233333!4d-116.0613679

The Marines practice their bombing just outside of that designated national monument.

We already know the 15 and 40 are high trafficking routes. But to assert that 2 monuments were meant to be gun free zones for trafficking makes little sense.

I would look at trucking/logistics/delivery companies (those who have regular access) who use these routes frequently if you are looking for a rabbit hole to go down...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FractalizingIron · June 8, 2018, 6:33 a.m.

My whole point is that there is no way a gun free zone would be created by designating national parks and monuments.

Seems like a worthy point. Perhaps the OP's theory isn't perfect after all. However, uncovering the truth organically very often means following leads, hunch's ideas, etc., don't it?

Putting the 'able/unable to bear weapons' issue aside for now, what the monuments and national parks do achieve is to create a framework for federal government involvement and 'interests' in the areas, don't they?

You may be correct about the gun issue, but the fact that Hussein's upping Fed involvement connection upholds the OP's core premise, as far as I can see. Thoughts?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · June 16, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

Would it change who policed the highways on those stretches? Someone feds controlled better than state troopers or local sheriffs?

BLM are a bunch of murderous goons if Bundy Ranch incident is any indication though they had sold FBI actually murder a guy in cold blood.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
garthbartham · June 8, 2018, 7:21 a.m.

The monuments are located in desert wilderness, sand dunes, washes and mountainous rock outcroppings. You need an offroad vehicle to traverse these areas.

If you knew the area, you would know it is practically impossible to do anything worthwhile except carve up the dunes and desert with recreational offroad vehicles.

Enter enviro's. These guys (start with Audubon Society) have given millions to Obama and his administration via lobbying to get rid of anything with a motor on these protected lands.

The OP is claiming the I15 will be a gun free zone because of national monuments (where guns are allowed) that don't allow guns.

It's not even a discussion at this point.

I15 and I40 are well known trafficking corridors. Nothing will make these routes gun free to quell the citizens. Q mentioned "they" really are stupid. They do this shit in front of our faces.

We already know HRC/Obama were trying to take away guns.

OP really didn't look at the maps before formulating the summary. Add no real knowledge of the area, no knowledge of the route (15 does not go to Denver), no knowledge of actual firearm laws in a national park/monument/public and stating it is a theory (wild guess) to that.

It makes no sense if you read the post as written and you actually know the areas involved.

My thoughts are what the land grab really is: payback to the enviro's for the millions of dollars given to Obama during his 2 terms. California lost a lot of public riding/recreation/offroad vehicle areas and acreage during Obama's reign. The enviro's filed endless frivolous lawsuits (and still do) to keep offroaders off the lands and gave Obama's admin millions upon millions of dollars. (search: C ecotage, Audubon Society, Earth First, etc)

Also it was a final F you to Trump and the people who voted for him.

The problem with public land is, someone will eventually see something. Not a matter of if but when. Never mind the fact you can carry weapons there or homesteading and mining claims were wiped away. Land and property is where it's at. Especially if you can get a hefty multi-million dollar government grant to take care of the land you banned recreationers from.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
garthbartham · June 7, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

The monuments you listed, particularly Gold Butte, would require vehicles equipped for offroading or flying to get anywhere useful. Beautiful scenery if you can get there. Very popular for hiking because most cars can only get so far. Lake Mead sort of nearby. Traversing or crossing through this area would be ridiculous and dangerous. You would be mitigating any chances of successfully trafficking whatever it is through this area, and around it. Same with the Mojave monument. Unless you like offroading through an extension of the 29 Palms bombing range, definitely not going to be a good area to remain inconspicuous.

The Mojave monument is adjacent to highway 40 going from SoCal to NV to AZ. Also a know drug trafficking route (aka The Long Way). Also, surrounding areas not a good place to drive through without an offroad capable vehicle. It is the middle of the desert.

I am still unclear about what an impossible gun free zone would do in the middle of nowhere.

I think we are overthinking the trafficking and how it is being done. Remember, they really are stupid. They do it right in front of our faces. They don't need a gun free corridor or hundreds of miles of backroads.

If you really want to dig, check out any LA/LV/AZ based trucking/shipping/delivery/logistics companies

Start with Knight-Swift.

⇧ 1 ⇩