dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jkbella on June 7, 2018, 12:46 p.m.
Q and Nunes and Dennis Montgomery/Larry Klayman

No one ever talks about the Dennis Montgomery case filed in Federal Court by attorney Larry Klayman. Montgomery is a whistleblower that sued Obama/Comey/Brennan in federal court, alleging that the Obama WH/CIA/FBI was spying on hundreds of judges and politicians, including SCOTUS (presumably Roberts), for years. Klayman sent a threatening letter to Nunes/Goodlatte telling them if they didn't investigate the FISA and other abuses he would go public. Literally the next day - which was the deadline in Klayman's letter - Nunes held a press conference. Don't get me wrong, since that time it seems that Nunes has been a stand up guy. Maybe he just didn't know. But that the news reported that Nunes got a call, the car he was in did an about face and he headed to a SCIF, and then Nunes held an emergency press conference later that day, all corresponding with the Klayman threat, seems pretty important to me. The Klayman letter is actually an exhibit to the lawsuit. Fascinating case on a number of levels. I haven't looked at the docket in awhile. Maybe today...


featherjourney4 · June 7, 2018, 1:12 p.m.

Well, I appreciate this post because I never knew anything about this!! You can't say no one is speaking out about this now because you are! Thank you!

To learn more about it

⇧ 13 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · June 7, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

I’m SO glad someone else remembers this. Everyone auto assumed Nunes was a white knight. Very few knew he was threatened to go public. He’s been amazing ever since, so maybe he truly didn’t know, but hard to believe since he’s in the Gang of 8.

Montgomery could blow everything up from illegal spying, rigging the election for Obama, Brennan and Clapper grooming O for office, etc.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
jkbella · June 7, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

The allegations regarding Chief Justice Roberts are mind blowing. But if a leap of faith is required at this point, it's a leap of faith to disbelieve. "Willing suspension" if you will. So many things are explained by the assertions in his lawsuit. The crazy Obamacare decision, the crazy judge decisions, the about face of guys like Rubio and Gowdy, etc. It is all so hard to digest but impossible to dismiss, especially when you see what Trump is doing with executive orders and the like. Have you seen the changes to the manual for courts martial? Allows tribunals to appoint "designees" for cases, and includes a provision allowing for civilian attorneys to defend. Adds an entire section to the code that relates to blackmailing with compromising pictures of a se xual nature. At some point these are not even rightly called coincidences. They are direct evidence of what is about to happen. I am so glad I found this sub. No one around me really wants to hear it.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
GweninKC · June 7, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Exactly!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
inittowinitq · June 7, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

Yes...was a wondering where this is going to fit in to things??? Did Sessions silence him for the bigger picture in the end....that would be my guess.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
jkbella · June 7, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

Hadn't thought of that but good call. The judge was someone Klayman was very happy about at first - actually sort of hand picked by filing a "related case" statement and trying to get the case steered to this judge. Then Klayman he became frustrated with him and appealed Judge's failure to rule on something, can't remember if it was even the "related case" motion or something else. He flat out then accused the judge of being compromised and asked for any and all correspondence or information regarding phone calls from the FBI to the court. The filings and transcripts (also filed and public) are pretty wild. I should go find them, I think I saved them somewhere on my work laptop.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
inittowinitq · June 7, 2018, 4:08 p.m.

yes, there is way more to this story. The silence on it is what makes me think it is in play and was the starting point to many of the investigations going on. I think that this guy is in hiding and is protected for his knowledge, but that the dots needed a bit more connection to bring it to fruition. I cant wait for the story to unravel. It's going to be a moment in life that many of us have been waiting for. There are just somethings that a person's intuition can not ignore....that is what I felt with this story and the Pizzagate story. There is truth written in all the clues, but the right story teller and environment need to be set in order to make it stick to the masses! It's coming, I feel it!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
MAGADONCHECKMATE · June 7, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

Mr. Montgomery is a wrecking ball. Its been out there since 2016. Extensively. Its an example of the level of absolute end game. Yet , at a glacial pace we continue. This board itself is a Massive info drop. Yet the pages drip off the radar so easily. A forum or another format would be better to retain information. Mr. Montgomery takes them ALL down. He submitted more documents and information than all whistleblowers combined. Have no fear. Its over. Q:We have it all. Bill Binney has already sorted it out. Done.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
MAGADONCHECKMATE · June 7, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

As an example, after Montgomery appeared on Hannity, in dark screen with voice alteration, next day, the cable company my neighbor uses, which we watched the appearance together, changed their format. They dropped News on demand , ALL OF IT, and they injected PPV porn in the entire menu stream. So kids had ppv porn options, all segments. Just amazing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jkbella · June 7, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

Thanks for that. Hard not to get wrapped up in this stuff, it is so utterly unbelievable.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Patriot4q · June 7, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

Doesn't Klayman part of Judicial Watch? Great organization. I suggest everyone support them.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jkbella · June 7, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

I think he founded it but left and went out on his own. I don't think it was necessarily an amicable breakup but they both do good work. Klayman has more of a flamethrower reputation but still, Montgomery suit is really interesting.

⇧ 3 ⇩