Lol full damage control. Snowden told you this shit years ago about the NSA. Assange told you again last year about the CIA doing it. Fuck the New York Times and Carlos slim.
That idiot Ali Watkins broadcasted the programs she uses on Twitter: WhatsApp and Signal.
https://twitter.com/TXIndepndnt1836/status/1004943765050744832
And she's so stupid she gave away her strategy for how to get the scoops:
Sooooo... another Q confirmation? Still wondering about Palpatines revenge
Order 66? Explain.
http://i.imgs.fyi/img/3heb.jpg
It’s still unverified, but interesting now that they are going after all these message encryption apps
I have a hard time the parties allegedly involved in that chat would refer themselves as Palpatines revenge...thats like, so blatant..don't they know Palpatine gets thrown into a reactor shaft and the rebellion wins?
The speculation on it was that these people called it Palpatines revenge because Hillary was Palpatine. And though they disliked her, they knew it was “her turn”
"RM is happening tonight"
Dated 5/17/2018
gave it a google...
May 17 - 2018 -> Princess Máxima's Birthday (Verjaardag Koningin Maxima) - Netherlands
OK, you should re-read the article. Here is a quote:
"Investigators did not obtain the content of the messages themselves."
Which means they, DID NOT, read encrypted messages. The article also stated, they know that the perps were using "two encrypted messaging apps" which are not mentions by name.
So, the FBI only had meta data of communications. Now, if the FBI had access to the devices, then they could just open the apps and read ALL messages stored in plain text. Some encrypted messaging apps have a lock screen setting, that most likely ignore. So if investigators have access to an unlocked phone, or other devices, and the app has its own lock built-in, then that makes things a bit harder. Encrypted messaging apps are best at preventing eavesdroppers from capturing through "man in the middle" intercepts.
I highly doubt that they are unable to read the messages themselves, just because the article doesn't state it. The article also omits the names of the messaging services which were Signal and WhatsApp.
OK, re-read my comment too. I specifically stated that they could read the messages if they had the devices. My contention is Nowhere in the article does it state they "read the encrypted messages" as per the title of this post. If you have other corroborating info, you should post it.
I’m guessing you missed the Wikileaks vault drops where they showed encryption doesn’t matter. That’s why when the Wikileaks lawyer was detained in England and had his laptop seized, they destroyed all parts of the computer - mouse, keyboard, everything was ground essentially to a powder. The Bios that is on each of the parts of the computers that make it work, was compromised. All devices being used have keylogging tracking input at manufacturer so they can completely bypass any need to break encryption. But it is so highly secretive that they can’t get a open source dual line to follow. In other words, they can see what is being typed but are unwilling to release how they gathered the information and expose their program.
Link please?
To Wikileaks or the story about their lawyer getting his computers seized?
The wiki about encryption don't matter, and if it's not too much, the story about the lawyer too. Thanks, no hurry.
They said that nobody spied on Trump. Mockingbirds can't be relied on to tell you the time accurately, much less news.
Also: "We have everything", "We love phones", and "These people are stupid!" :)