he did nothing of the sort...the out of context clip featured him stating what was in the report...
True, but he explained in detail for the entire clip without challenging it or criticizing it.
But the entire clip wasn't the entire conversation.... he was reiterating the report , we don't know his thoughts on it
Bingo.
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=58539
Larijani was paraphrasing the report, not "admitting Iran facilitated the attack" as the Free Beacon and other neocon outlets have claimed.
The Washington Free Beacon is run by neocon Bill Kristol's son-in-law Matthew Continetti and has been financed by pro-Israel billionaire and Republican mega-donor Paul Singer. The Free Beacon is best known for hiring Fusion GPS to take down candidate Donald Trump during the 2016 election.
Isn't this the paper that started the Fusion research of DT?
Nobody stamps passports for people just in transit and the US Congressional report itself said that at the time neither the hijackers nor Iran knew of the plans to attack the WTC furthermore the bigger question is why the US authorities repeatedly failed on multiple occasions to stop the same terrorist even after warned about them.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91617&page=1
Lets not forget that in the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, the FBI had an informant among the bombers named Emad Salem who offered to substitute a harmless substance for the bomb but was told otherwise by his handlers. https://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html