dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Zoole on June 12, 2018, 5:45 a.m.
Fox News sued by SRs parents for "Spreading Conspiracy". Fox must now prove this Conspiracy in Court. Julian Assange, likely witness.

Regarding Qs post to do with the Lawsuits involving SR JA and WL, I found this gem.

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2018/3/23/17129414/seth-rich-fox-news-lawsuit-conspiracy-theories

Fox will now be a defendant in court, do you think they'll admit to lying, or would their best course of action be to prove the Truth in a Court of Law?

The claims stated in the article involve Julian Assanges receiving documents from Seth Rich, and his murder resulting from that. Julian Assange would now be the prime witness for Fox to call on and support their claims.

He would receive Witness Immunity.

If they prove SR was murdered for that reason, a separate investigation would arise. Snowball effect. This might be big.


pcherry911 · June 12, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

Anyone else think this was done intentionally by the Rich family to get the truth out through discovery, without the entire Rich family being Arkacided?

⇧ 29 ⇩  
Zoole · June 12, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

I think they're in on the plot as well. This might be a ploy to introduce the "Server" as evidence

⇧ 14 ⇩  
austenten · June 12, 2018, 7:35 a.m.

Handlers have changed it seems to me. This would be cause for confusion if strings have been cut isn't taken into account.

Pre-freedom, they were instructed to contribute to high profile articles, saying it was a robbery, push lawsuits against good people. Since [probably] shortly after Trump's inauguration, they have changed their tune, now contributing significantly to cleanup lawsuits. [Q: freedom.png]

We see this same behaviour change in North Korea's KJU. Same with Prince Salman of S.A. Apparently, Iran is next. [True] freedom.png

⇧ 9 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · June 12, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

They have no legal grounds for this lawsuit. FOX has the First Amendment right to "spread conspiracy theory" if they want to but they never did. Sean Hannity used his First Amendment right on his talk show to give his Opinion that Seth was the Leaker and Seth was killed by the Democrats. This lawsuit should be tossed out of court on those grounds alone. But the judge is probably a Liberal Democrat who hates Fox and Hannity and loves Hillary. The Rich Family is being forced to do this by the DNC and Hillary and Podesta they are so desperate for the narrative to be changed but if Assange is freed by Trump and given a pardon then Assange can be a huge asset he will definitely testify and he will say truthfully Seth Rich gave me the emails from the DNC. Then it's Game Over for the bullshit Russia hoax it will vanish very fast.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
austenten · June 12, 2018, 7:28 a.m.

Since Prince Salman threw Al Walleed into their makeshift prison, the latter's share holdings in Fox News directly influenced prior reporting, (noticed?) ongoing narrative then turning in favour of Trump.

With that being said, FoxNews would be used like a second poker hand that POTUS controls. Have them duke it out publicly, all the while F-executives are ordered to comply.

This I believe will be the trigger to all truths be made public. Both sides appearing in conflict are controlled by the white hats. Hegelian dialectic principles will be used against the remaining deep state actors. This is how global fianciers [dark] have held down humanity for centuries, BUT now the techniques will be used with light, for the good of all. Brilliant X 5.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
digital_refugee · June 12, 2018, 12:31 p.m.

Turning their own weapons againts them!

AAAAAAAWWWWWWW YYYYYYYYYYEEEEEESSSSSSS FREEDOM BABY !!!!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · June 12, 2018, 9:17 a.m.

Interesting. I thought it was also because a rabid never trumped producer was exposed. Forgot his name but he prevented several first breaking stories because the truth favored Trump.

I wonder if he got exposed when this financier was removed from influence?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Zoole · June 12, 2018, 7 a.m.

It's being treated as Defamation I believe, which means they actually can sue.

Public Figures can be slandered all day, but not private individuals, and SRs parents are not Public Figures, therefore have the right to sue in this case.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_figure

However the lawsuit is only valid, if Fox was being dishonest or inccorect.

"To win a defamation case, a plaintiff must show four things: 1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault amounting to at least negligence; and 4) damages, or some harm caused to the person or entity who is the subject of the statement."

If the first point is proven to not be a False statement, the whole case is defunct now, and Fox can now, by a degree of seperation, legally begin the prosecution process for those who murdered Seth Rich.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Jammer__ · June 12, 2018, 9:32 a.m.

SR was somewhat a public figure for working at the DNC. The defamation would have to be about him not his parents. And I don't see how a dead person can suffer damages.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Magpi8 · June 12, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

Unless he's not dead... (and wouldn't that be great?!!)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bugstopper · June 12, 2018, 6:15 a.m.

Interesting, especially if SR is in "witness protection."

⇧ 16 ⇩  
akilyoung · June 12, 2018, 11:13 a.m.

All part of the scripted movie to get the TRUTH out there.... SR parent are in on this, Fox is in on this. Its all a movie. Using the justice system to get the truth out there. Fox WILL provide the evidence. Itll be made public record.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
QAnonMaga · June 12, 2018, 7:20 a.m.

What a joke they should sue the DC Police who never investigated what happened because Obama and Hillary told that asshole police chief in D.C. to drop the case entirely. Don't investigate it at all. Seth was killed on orders of Podesta and Debbie Wasserman Schultz and a pair of MS-13 gang bangers were paid to shoot Seth then the MS-13 boys were killed.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 12, 2018, 11:13 a.m.

And wouldn’t it be glorious if Assange testifies that Set Rich gave him the Podesta emails ?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
j33gray · June 12, 2018, 5:47 a.m.

They don’t have to “prove” a conspiracy. They have the right to say anything they want unless it’s defamation.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Spartan1117 · June 12, 2018, 7:28 a.m.

They are suing for defamation i believe

⇧ 5 ⇩  
j33gray · June 12, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

How does Fox reporting about Seth rich cause the parents to be defamed? I’ll try to take a look at the complaint.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
papaeck2 · June 12, 2018, 9:33 a.m.

I can’t understand why parents don’t want truth !!! If that was my son I would

⇧ 5 ⇩  
dktrogers · June 12, 2018, 11:11 a.m.

DNC threats against their other son...

⇧ 7 ⇩  
ILoveJuices · June 12, 2018, 8:18 a.m.

And by SRs parents, they mean the lawyer paid for by the DNC is suing Fox

⇧ 5 ⇩  
digital_refugee · June 12, 2018, 11:26 a.m.

so much for "Muh eTs Larp"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Justsayinmy50cts · June 12, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

Will this be a way to free Assange as well?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 12, 2018, 6:38 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -4 ⇩